Top 5 Business Immigration Developments to Watch in 2020
With the 2020 election on the horizon, the coming year promises to be a big one for employment-related immigration developments.
January 15, 2020 at 12:01 PM
5 minute read
With the 2020 election on the horizon, the coming year promises to be a big one for employment-related immigration developments.
Here's a roundup of the top five things to watch:
- H-1B changes
- H-4 EAD
- USCIS fee increases
- Increased I-9 audits and site visits
- Restrictive CBP border policies
H-1B Changes
Employers should expect big changes to the H-1B visa program this year.
In March, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS), the government agency that oversees the H-1B program, will roll out a new H-1B registration system. Employers will be required to use the system to electronically pre-register for the H-1B lottery, which is held in April to determine who will receive H-1B visa numbers from the 85,000 allocated each year by Congress. Pre-registration has the potential to streamline the H-1B filing process but could lead to increased filings overall, which in turn could cause problems for smaller companies trying to compete for the coveted visas.
Also expect to see a new proposed rule from USCIS that would limit H-1B eligibility to occupations with very specific educational requirements for entry—making it harder to obtain H-1Bs in interdisciplinary and emerging fields, like marketing analytics. The proposal likely will reflect how the agency already is treating H-1B petitions, but codifying the practice will make it more difficult to challenge visa denials in federal court.
|H-4 EAD
March 2020 is the target date for a proposed rule to rescind the H-4 EAD, which allows the spouses of certain H-1B visa holders to work. Statistics indicate that the vast majority of H-4 beneficiaries are women from India who, prior to enactment of H-4 EAD in 2015, had very few opportunities to earn a living outside the home. If the H-4 EAD is taken away, many H-4 spouses will face 10 to 15 years or more waiting for a green card, and the ability to rejoin the workforce, due to per-country limits.
If the rule is published, expect many comments, which will delay enactment of the final rule.
|USCIS Fee Increases
Employers can expect to pay more for work visas in 2020 if the latest fee schedule proposed by USCIS is implemented. The proposal would hike fees by more than 50% for an array of employment-based benefits. For example, the fee for filing an L-1 petition would increase by as much as 77%, and O-1 filing fees would rise by as much as 55%. The proposal also includes changes to USCIS forms and benefit request requirements, and would increase the time USCIS has to process premium processing requests.
USCIS's budget has already increased by more than 30% over the last four fiscal years. Yet the agency's average case processing time climbed by 91% during the same period. USCIS has tried to attribute delays to high-application rates, but according to the agency's own data, application rates have actually been on the decline. The real reason for the growing case backlog has to do with the agency's new policies and practices under President Donald Trump. For example, the agency has expanded in-person interview and fingerprinting requirements for a variety of case types. USCIS has also been issuing unprecedented numbers of requests for evidence (RFEs), seeking more paperwork from applicants or petitioners in connection with pending benefit requests.
The proposed USCIS fee schedule and changes to benefit request requirements have been met with strong opposition, garnering over 10,000 comments. Still, the proposed rule is expected to pass and go into effect sometime this year. It remains to be seen what, if any, actions USCIS will take to address the record-breaking and still growing backlog of pending immigration cases.
|Increased I-9 Audits and Site Visits
U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) conducted an unprecedented number of I-9 audits in 2019, issuing notices of inspection (NOIs) to more than 3,000 companies in the month of July alone. A company that receives an NOI has three days to produce all of its I-9s for ICE review. The I-9 audit surge is expected to continue in 2020, and employers are strongly advised to be prepared.
USCIS has indicated it will also continue to ramp up its investigative efforts, namely through random and targeted visits to H-1B and L-1 employer worksites conducted by its Office of Fraud Detection and National Security (FDNS).
|Restrictive CBP Border Policies
U.S. Customs and Border Patrol (CBP) has indicated it will continue to apply heightened scrutiny to Canadian nationals seeking work visas—like the TN and L-1—at the border. Based on recent trends, border applicants will likely have a harder time applying for TN classification under NAFTA, especially if their U.S. jobs involve any managerial responsibility. Those seeking to renew their L-1 classification at the border should expect to be refused by CBP and will likely need to apply through USCIS in order to re-enter the United States for work. All travelers seeking to enter the United States from Canada, whether entering for the first time or returning from work trips or vacations, should be prepared for more intensive border patrol questioning and vetting in 2020.
What you can expect in 2020 looks much like what we have seen escalating year over year since 2017: the Trump administration systematically targeting skilled and legal immigrants and their sponsoring employers by making the process increasingly costly, more confusing and time-intensive.
Lauren D. Berkowitz is lead attorney at Berk Immigration Law and provides strategic and comprehensive business immigration solutions for the firm's corporate clients.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllDon’t Settle for the Minimum: Finding Constitutional Claims Closer to Home
7 minute readSeven Rules of the Road for Managing Referrals To/From Other Attorneys, Part 1
7 minute readMatt's Corner: RPC 8.4(d)—Conduct Prejudicial to the Administration of Justice
2 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250