$10.5M Settlement Reached in Lawsuit Over Laborer Death at Phila. Pier
A lawsuit filed by the estate of a man who was killed in a fall at a Philadelphia pier rehabilitation project has settled its case for $10.5 million, lawyers for the family announced. The agreement between Kimberly Bolden-Johnson, administratrix of the estate of John "Jay" Johnson, and Agate Construction Company settles claims that alleged recklessness on the defendant's part caused Johnson to fall through a hole in the pier and into the Delaware River in January 2016.
January 16, 2020 at 11:44 AM
3 minute read
A lawsuit filed by the estate of a man who was killed in a fall at a Philadelphia pier rehabilitation project has settled its case for $10.5 million, lawyers for the family announced.
The agreement between Kimberly Bolden-Johnson, administratrix of the estate of John "Jay" Johnson, and Agate Construction Company settles claims that alleged recklessness on the defendant's part caused Johnson to fall through a hole in the pier and into the Delaware River in January 2016.
"Jay was a good man," said Bolden-Johnson's lawyer, Brian Fritz of Fritz & Bianculli in Philadelphia. "He and every worker deserve a safe worksite. This accident could have and should have been prevented. The defendant has a history of allowing poor and unsafe working conditions that have led to other workers being put in harms' way."
He continued, "We have to put an end to government contracts being blindly handed out to the lowest bidder. The well-being of the workforce has to be the top priority. Those awarding contracts should investigate these companies better to ensure the safety of all involved."
John Donovan of Wilson Elser represents Agate and did not respond to requests for comment.
In the plaintiff's pretrial memorandum, Bolden-Johnson pointed out an alleged history of safety incidents at Agate work sites including the loss of one worker's hand in 2012 as well as the death of a driver at another project in 2013.
Bolden-Johnson alleged the defendant did not make conditions safer at the site her husband worked on, despite a history of accidents.
"At night, the pier was dark and difficult to navigate. The pier's walking surface was a minefield of dangers," court papers said. "Defendants had cut gaping holes into the walking surface of the pier. Each cavernous hole led precipitously to the waters of Delaware River below. Yet, in reckless disregard to worker safety, defendants did not cover the holes or protect the holes in any way. Instead, defendants left the holes to sit, uncovered/unprotected, for weeks."
Agate, in its pretrial memorandum, claimed Johnson was not wearing the necessary safety gear when he fell through the hole.
"While his co-workers were on a break, Mr. Johnson, without wearing the required fall protection harness, fell into the Delaware River and Drowned," defense papers said.
Agate also claimed it was immune from liability because Johnson worked for Agate's subcontractor.
"Mr. Johnson was a direct employee of Atlantic, Agate's subcontractor. The nature of the relationship gives rise to the finding that Agate was Mr. Johnson's statutory employer and therefore immune from civil liability under the Worker's Compensation Act," defense papers said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSamuel M. Lehrer, Retired Philadelphia Court of Common Pleas Judge, Dies
1 minute readLongtime Reed Smith Health Care Partner Opts for Solo Practice Over Retirement
3 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250