Duane Morris Merger a 'Standout' in Industry's Quest for Scale
The firms' leaders and industry observers pointed to geographic growth and client demand as key drivers of the deal, which the firms plan to finalize by the end of this month.
January 17, 2020 at 04:00 PM
4 minute read
The planned merger of Philadelphia-based Duane Morris and New York firm Satterlee Stephens is the latest sign of how much large and midsize firms alike see scale as a key strategic asset.
The two firms on Thursday officially announced their plans to finalize a merger by the end of the month.
For Duane Morris, the deal solidifies the firm as "a formidable presence in New York," chairman Matthew Taylor said.
Satterlee Stephens had been approached by many firms about a potential deal over the years, executive committee chair Jim Coster said. But this time, he said, the practice groups and people matched up well, and Duane Morris's geographic footprint was an added bonus.
Law firm consultant Kent Zimmermann of Zeughauser Group said the move makes sense for a firm like Duane Morris, which is looking to build around industry sectors like tech, life sciences and financial services, while increasing profitability.
Zimmermann has worked with Duane Morris on its overall strategy, though he did not advise on the deal—Taylor and Coster said no recruiter or consultant was involved. He called the combination "a standout deal."
"In Satterlee they have a firm that is also strong in those industries and in a higher-rate market in New York," Zimmermann said. "It's not every day you see a firm of Satterlee's quality in a market as competitive in New York."
Duane Morris is by far the larger of the two firms, with a head count of 671 in 2019, based on ALM's NLJ 500 list of largest law firms, compared to 65 at Satterlee.
But Satterlee represents a significant boost to Duane Morris' top line—the New York firm has annual revenue in the $40 million range, the firm leaders said. Based on Duane Morris' 2018 revenue of $491.6 million that's roughly an 8% boost in gross revenue.
By combining with Satterlee, Duane Morris is adding lawyers who have served large financial institutions and corporations in complex commercial litigation. In particular, the firm's partners have advised Moody's, Oppenheimer & Co., JPMorgan Chase, IBM, Exxon, Johnson & Johnson, Bank of Montreal, Investors Bank, Stifel Nicolaus and Co. and Calvin Klein Inc., according to the firm's website and court records.
In New York, the move brings Duane Morris to 160 lawyers from just under 100. While Coster said geographic expansion wasn't a driver in his own firm's decision to merge, Duane Morris' presence in California, Chicago and London will be particularly beneficial for clients.
Speaking generally about law firm combinations, Tom Clay, of law firm consultancy Altman Weil, said midsize firms in New York will continue to merge into larger firms when it becomes clear that their clients are outgrowing the firm. Sometimes, that feedback comes straight from the client, "which is the worst thing," he said.
At the same time, Clay noted, larger firms in various markets have a "voracious appetite" for midsize mergers. "Anytime they can find a good tasty morsel like that they're going to snap it up," he said.
For Philadelphia Big Law firms in particular, Clay said, the recent string of major mergers reflects the challenges continued growth at home. In addition to Duane Morris, Philadelphia-based Drinker Biddle & Reath and Pepper Hamilton each announced major combinations in recent weeks with Am Law 100 firms based elsewhere.
"It's a good market but it's not one of the higher growth markets for business," Clay said.
From the other side, however, firms from Philadelphia remain attractive as merger partners, Zimmermann added. It's still within the top 10 markets for law firm billing rates, and the large firms based here have made progress expanding in other high-rate markets.
"By combining with a Philadelphia firm you get the benefit of their growth in other high-rate markets," Zimmermann said.
Read More
Duane Morris, NY-Based Satterlee Stephens To Merge in February
Under Pressure From All Sides, Law Firms Are Responding by Scaling Up
Partner Profits Pass $1M at Duane Morris as Growth Streak Continues
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllWhether to Choose State or Federal Court in a Case Involving a Franchise?
5 minute readTrump RTO Mandates Won’t Disrupt Big Law Policies—But Client Expectations Might
6 minute readKirkland Lands in Phila., but Rate Pressure May Limit the High-Flying Firm's Growth Prospects
5 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250