Duane Morris Merger a 'Standout' in Industry's Quest for Scale
The firms' leaders and industry observers pointed to geographic growth and client demand as key drivers of the deal, which the firms plan to finalize by the end of this month.
January 17, 2020 at 04:00 PM
4 minute read
The planned merger of Philadelphia-based Duane Morris and New York firm Satterlee Stephens is the latest sign of how much large and midsize firms alike see scale as a key strategic asset.
The two firms on Thursday officially announced their plans to finalize a merger by the end of the month.
For Duane Morris, the deal solidifies the firm as "a formidable presence in New York," chairman Matthew Taylor said.
Satterlee Stephens had been approached by many firms about a potential deal over the years, executive committee chair Jim Coster said. But this time, he said, the practice groups and people matched up well, and Duane Morris's geographic footprint was an added bonus.
Law firm consultant Kent Zimmermann of Zeughauser Group said the move makes sense for a firm like Duane Morris, which is looking to build around industry sectors like tech, life sciences and financial services, while increasing profitability.
Zimmermann has worked with Duane Morris on its overall strategy, though he did not advise on the deal—Taylor and Coster said no recruiter or consultant was involved. He called the combination "a standout deal."
"In Satterlee they have a firm that is also strong in those industries and in a higher-rate market in New York," Zimmermann said. "It's not every day you see a firm of Satterlee's quality in a market as competitive in New York."
Duane Morris is by far the larger of the two firms, with a head count of 671 in 2019, based on ALM's NLJ 500 list of largest law firms, compared to 65 at Satterlee.
But Satterlee represents a significant boost to Duane Morris' top line—the New York firm has annual revenue in the $40 million range, the firm leaders said. Based on Duane Morris' 2018 revenue of $491.6 million that's roughly an 8% boost in gross revenue.
By combining with Satterlee, Duane Morris is adding lawyers who have served large financial institutions and corporations in complex commercial litigation. In particular, the firm's partners have advised Moody's, Oppenheimer & Co., JPMorgan Chase, IBM, Exxon, Johnson & Johnson, Bank of Montreal, Investors Bank, Stifel Nicolaus and Co. and Calvin Klein Inc., according to the firm's website and court records.
In New York, the move brings Duane Morris to 160 lawyers from just under 100. While Coster said geographic expansion wasn't a driver in his own firm's decision to merge, Duane Morris' presence in California, Chicago and London will be particularly beneficial for clients.
Speaking generally about law firm combinations, Tom Clay, of law firm consultancy Altman Weil, said midsize firms in New York will continue to merge into larger firms when it becomes clear that their clients are outgrowing the firm. Sometimes, that feedback comes straight from the client, "which is the worst thing," he said.
At the same time, Clay noted, larger firms in various markets have a "voracious appetite" for midsize mergers. "Anytime they can find a good tasty morsel like that they're going to snap it up," he said.
For Philadelphia Big Law firms in particular, Clay said, the recent string of major mergers reflects the challenges continued growth at home. In addition to Duane Morris, Philadelphia-based Drinker Biddle & Reath and Pepper Hamilton each announced major combinations in recent weeks with Am Law 100 firms based elsewhere.
"It's a good market but it's not one of the higher growth markets for business," Clay said.
From the other side, however, firms from Philadelphia remain attractive as merger partners, Zimmermann added. It's still within the top 10 markets for law firm billing rates, and the large firms based here have made progress expanding in other high-rate markets.
"By combining with a Philadelphia firm you get the benefit of their growth in other high-rate markets," Zimmermann said.
|Read More
Duane Morris, NY-Based Satterlee Stephens To Merge in February
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSpecial Section: Products Liability, Mass Torts & Class Action/Personal Injury
2 minute readThe Products Liability Case Against Tianeptine: The Deadly ‘Dietary Supplement’ Found at Your Local Store
9 minute readThe Evolving Landscape of Joint and Several Liability in Pa.: A Post-'Spencer' Analysis
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Weil Practice Leaders Expected to Leave for Paul Weiss, Latham
- 2Senators Grill Visa, Mastercard Execs on Alleged Anti-Competitive Practices, Fees
- 3Deal Watch: Gibson Dunn, V&E, Kirkland Lead Big Energy Deals in Another Strong Week in Transactions
- 4Advisory Opinion Offers 'Road Map' for Judges Defending Against Campaign Attacks
- 5Commencement of Child Victims Act at Heart of Federal Question Posed to NY's Top Court
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250