Lawmakers Aim to Stop Closure of 2 Institutions for Disabled
The state House of Representatives voted 139-55 for legislation to prevent a governor from closing any of Pennsylvania's four remaining state centers for at least five years, and then only with approval from an independent task force.
January 17, 2020 at 01:00 PM
3 minute read
A fight to block Gov. Tom Wolf from closing two state centers for the intellectually disabled produced a second large majority in Pennsylvania's Republican-controlled Legislature on Jan. 15, even as Wolf vowed to continue a decades-old trend away from institutional care.
The state House of Representatives voted 139-55 for legislation to prevent a governor from closing any of Pennsylvania's four remaining state centers for at least five years, and then only with approval from an independent task force.
In November, the Senate voted 40-9 for an earlier version of the bill. Wolf, a Democrat, has vowed to veto the bill, which requires another Senate vote to get to his desk.
Still, the bill faces an uphill climb to get Democratic lawmakers to go along with an override of a veto, and Senate Minority Leader Jay Costa, D-Allegheny, said most Democrats would not help form the two-thirds majority necessary to override a veto. Wolf has not had a veto overridden since he took office in 2015.
The bill emerged after Wolf's announcement in August that he would close White Haven in northeastern Pennsylvania and Polk in northwestern Pennsylvania.
Closing the centers could theoretically save money that could then help whittle down a 13,000-long waiting list of people with disabilities seeking state aid to begin or upgrade the services they receive in community settings.
At its high point, more than 13,000 people lived in 23 state centers in Pennsylvania, according to the Wolf administration. Since then, the nation has moved to reintegrate those people into settings closer to home, whether in smaller group homes with around-the-clock care or with relatives who receive in-home visits by direct care workers.
Rep. Dan Moul, R-Adams, called the vote one of the must gut-wrenching he has had to make. "Do we decide to keep these facilities open, operating very inefficiently and keeping these people who need the help where they are?" he said during the Jan. 15 half-hour floor debate. "Or do we decide to move them and help more people?"
The closings are being fought by employees and family members of the centers' residents, who also say they will file a lawsuit in federal court in the coming days in an effort to block the shutdowns.
Employees and relatives say the state centers have been good for its residents, the services are comprehensive, the staff is professional and moving could be traumatic for many residents who have severe disabilities and may have lived there for decades.
The Wolf administration has prominent allies, including the Arc of Pennsylvania and Disability Rights Pennsylvania, who argue that the state centers are an outdated, segregated model of treatment, and that people with severe disabilities are treated just as well in the community, for several times less.
Wolf's administration would close White Haven and Polk, where original buildings date back more than a century, over a three-year process. Administration officials say it will both save money and give those residents the opportunity to live closer to home in community settings that provide a higher quality of life.
The centers' residents can also move to one of the two other state centers, Selinsgrove and Ebensburg, where about 400 beds are available, Wolf administration officials say.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllPa. Federal District Courts Reach Full Complement Following Latest Confirmation
Federal Judge Hits US With $227,000 Sanction for Discovery Misconduct
3 minute readPa. Supreme Court Taps New Philadelphia Family Division Administrative Judge
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Like a Life Raft: Ben Brafman Reflects on Nearly 50 Years as a Defense Attorney
- 2HSF Partner Removed Over ‘Deeply Offensive’ Tweets
- 3Another Latham Partner Heads to Sidley in London
- 4In 'Kousisis,' the DOJ Once Again Pushes the Limits of Federal Fraud Prosecutions
- 5How Kirkland Has 'Reinvented a Meaningful Aspect' of Funds Work
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250