MyPhillyLawyer Firm: Ex-Paralegal's Harassment Claims Are 'Fabricated'
Plaintiffs firm Silvers, Langsam & Weitzman says it fired Kimberly Hayes because of her own misconduct.
January 23, 2020 at 01:48 PM
4 minute read
Philadelphia plaintiffs firm Silvers, Langsam & Weitzman is seeking summary judgment in a paralegal's harassment suit, arguing that she is not credible and that the "discrete incidents of merely crude comments" in her complaint do not constitute pervasive conduct.
The law firm, which markets itself as MyPhillyLawyer, filed a motion Jan. 17 seeking to have the case dismissed by summary judgment. The firm says it fired paralegal Kimberly Hayes in March 2018 "after learning that she had misrepresented to financial institutions, and potentially others, that the firm represented a party in a real estate transaction involving her live-in boyfriend and friends" without the firm's permission.
The law firm contends that Hayes' sexual harassment claims are "fabricated" and that she does not have enough evidence to show a hostile work environment.
Richard Harris of Littler Mendelson is representing the law firm. "Silvers, Langsam & Weitzman is a firm built on its reputation, brand and marketing," he said in an interview Thursday. "Now that we're able to file the papers and after discovery has been completed I think the picture is clear that the allegations are without support."
Hayes filed her complaint in March in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, asserting claims under Title VII and the Pennsylvania Human Relations Act.
Hayes worked at the firm as a paralegal from Jan. 8, 2018, to March 8, 2018, the complaint said. Her complaint listed eight alleged instances of "sexually harassing comments" she encountered during that time, but noted that the harassment was not limited to those examples.
The complaint alleged several instances of harassment by one lawyer at the firm, which included him "telling plaintiff that her 'boobs look good,'" and "touching her behind on a weekly basis."
According to the complaint, Hayes informed the head paralegal in February 2018 that she was uncomfortable with the advances and comments. In response, the head paralegal said Hayes "would get used to it," the complaint alleged.
In March 2018, Hayes took a vacation, the complaint said. When she arrived back at the firm she was told she had been terminated from her position. According to the complaint, a letter from the firm said she was fired for misrepresenting her interest in the property where she lives.
In its summary judgment motion, the firm argues that Hayes' testimony "directly contradicted every other witness deposed in the case." With regard to her harassment claims, the firm said two lawyers she mentioned in her complaint denied making sexual comments about her. And the firm said that the people to whom she allegedly made complaints internally—the lead paralegal and another attorney in the firm—denied receiving those complaints.
"Ms. Hayes' testimony constitutes bare, unsupported, and conclusory allegations, and cannot alone survive the firm's summary judgment motion," the motion said.
The firm also argues that her complaint fails because managing partner Dean Weitzman did not know about Hayes' alleged complaints, and because Hayes cannot dispute the given reason for her termination.
Hayes filed claims with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission and the Pennsylvania Human Relations Commission, and she was issued a right-to-sue letter in February.
Marisa Hermanovich and Kevin Costello of Costello & Mains are representing Hayes. Costello did not return a call seeking comment on the summary judgment motion.
|Read More
Paralegal Sues MyPhillyLawyer Firm Over Alleged Sexual Harassment
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSpecial Section: Products Liability, Mass Torts & Class Action/Personal Injury
2 minute readThe Products Liability Case Against Tianeptine: The Deadly ‘Dietary Supplement’ Found at Your Local Store
9 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250