Sideswipe Collision Due to Phantom Vehicle: Defense
On Nov. 24, 2014, plaintiff Beth Gillen was a passenger in a car that was traveling on Interstate 376 in Pittsburgh. The rear of the passenger's side was struck by the front of a car. Gillen suffered a back injury.
January 23, 2020 at 03:49 PM
3 minute read
Gillen v. Coryle
Defense Verdict
Date of Verdict: Nov. 1, 2019.
Court and Case No.: C.P. Allegheny No. GD-16-016043.
Judge: Philip A. Ignelzi.
Type of Action: Motor vehicle.
Injuries: Back injury.
Plaintiffs Counsel: Edward A. Shenderovich, Shenderovich, Shenderovich & Fishman, Pittsburgh.
Plaintiffs Expert: Derek J. Thomas, orthopedic surgery, Coraopolis.
Defense Counsel: Joseph A. Hudock Jr., Summers, McDonnell, Hudock, Guthrie & Rauch, Pittsburgh.
Defense Expert: Gerard J. Werries, orthopedic surgery, Pittsburgh.
Comment:
On Nov. 24, 2014, plaintiff Beth Gillen was a passenger in a car that was traveling on Interstate 376 in Pittsburgh. The rear of the passenger's side was struck by the front of a car. Gillen suffered a back injury.
Gillen sued Ryan Coryle, the driver of the vehicle that struck her car.
Prior to the collision, Coryle, driving in the right lane, was sideswiped on his driver's side by a phantom vehicle. The impact caused Coryle to lose control of his vehicle, veer to the right onto the berm and then re-enter the right lane, at which time he struck Gillen's sedan. Gillen's counsel argued that Coryle, after being struck by the phantom vehicle, should have been able to remain in the right lane, or should have stayed on the berm after being struck. The fact that he overcorrected and re-entered the right lane and struck Gillen's vehicle demonstrated that he was speeding at the time the phantom vehicle struck him, Gillen's counsel contended.
The defense maintained that Coryle was not liable for the accident. The defense argued that Coryle was driving within the speed limit or a little over it when the phantom vehicle struck his car; given the emergency situation, the defense stated, Coryle acted appropriately. The defense relied on the testimony of an eyewitness, who confirmed that a phantom vehicle struck Coryle's sedan.
Gillen was taken by ambulance to an emergency room where she complained of pain in her chest, right hip and pelvis. She was examined and released.
Gillen was ultimately diagnosed with a herniation at lumbar intervertebral disc L2-3. On Dec. 4, 2014, a week and a half after the accident, Gillen presented to an emergency room with complaints of pain in her neck and abdomen. She was given medication and discharged. On Feb. 17, 2015, Gillen presented to an emergency room; she complained of back pain. On March 9 she returned to an emergency room with persisting back pain; she was given steroid medication. On March 27 she came under the care of a physician who, via MRI, diagnosed her with a lumbar herniation.
That same year, on May 7, Gillen underwent a fusion at L2-3.
The jury did not hear about Gillen's injuries and treatment, since the parties agreed to try the case on liability only. Pursuant to the agreement, if the jury had found that Coryle was negligent, Gillen would have received $100,000, the amount of Coryle's policy.
The jury rendered a defense verdict. It found that Coryle was not negligent.
This report is based on information that was provided by defense counsel. Plaintiffs counsel did not respond to calls for comment.
—This report first appeared in VerdictSearch, an ALM publication
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllPa. Federal District Courts Reach Full Complement Following Latest Confirmation
The Defense Bar Is Feeling the Strain: Busy Med Mal Trial Schedules Might Be Phila.'s 'New Normal'
7 minute readFederal Judge Allows Elderly Woman's Consumer Protection Suit to Proceed Against Citizens Bank
5 minute readJudge Leaves Statute of Limitations Question in Injury Crash Suit for a Jury
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1DC Bar’s Proposed Anti-Discrimination, Harassment Conduct Rule Sees More Pushback
- 2California's Chief Justice Starts Third Year With Questions About Fires, Trump and AI
- 3Justin Baldoni Sues Blake Lively and Ryan Reynolds for $400M in New Step in 'It Ends With Us' Fight
- 4Top Leadership Changes Coming for NJ Attorney General's Office
- 5SCOTUSBlog Co-Founder Tom Goldstein Misused Law Firm Funds, According to Federal Indictment
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250