One Attorney's Struggle With Addiction Shines Light on Deeper Problem
In a stunning video recorded at Harvard Law School, Laurie J. Besden, executive director of Lawyers Concerned for Lawyers (LCL), provided similar statistics for law students when she recounted her story "To Hell and Back: One Lawyer's Path to Recovery."
January 29, 2020 at 12:12 PM
8 minute read
Every January, a group of lawyers I used work with went on a "diet." It's in quotes because, as one partner explained, the diet was an excuse to prove to themselves they weren't alcoholics following the excesses of the holiday season.
Recently I learned about "Dry January," a movement that began in the United Kingdom that encourages taking a break from alcohol for the month. Dry January was followed by "Sober October," which involves cutting out alcohol for 31 days, often for charity.
The existence of these jump-start efforts is evidence of a deeper problem we have with alcohol. And it hits the legal profession especially hard. As many as one in five lawyers is a problem drinker—twice the national rate, according to the American Bar Association.
Chances are, if you are sitting in a legal department, firm or court, some co-workers are struggling right now.
In a stunning video recorded at Harvard Law School, Laurie J. Besden, executive director of Lawyers Concerned for Lawyers (LCL), provided similar statistics for law students when she recounted her story "To Hell and Back: One Lawyer's Path to Recovery."
Her story is a jaw dropper. A daughter of privilege, she abused alcohol and drugs throughout college, law school, two bar exams and two judicial clerkships. She became a licensed attorney in Pennsylvania and New Jersey, but ultimately was convicted of multiple felonies for prescription fraud, served 11 and a half months in prison and was suspended from practicing law in both states.
Besden now devotes herself to helping lawyers, judges, their family members and law students struggling with substance use and mental health disorders through her employ with LCL.
We talked about Dry January, her insights on how to know if you have a problem and what to do if you know someone who does.
How do I know if I have an alcohol problem?
Besden: My definition of an alcoholic is not only someone that drinks every day. It's what happens when you drink. If you have one day a year that you binge drink and you black out, you have a problem with alcohol. The fact that you're asking me how to know if you have a problem—you're not asking how do I know if I have a problem with consuming apples. You only try to control things that you may actually have a problem with. So, as far as Dry January, it's not like people are saying let's not have apples in January. If it's something you feel you should try to control or limit yourself from doing, it's probably something you should take an honest look at."
You put that perfectly. It's not like you're just trying to cut calories.
You know, some people actually just don't drink and they don't care about alcohol. [I have been asked] what's the right balance of alcohol at an event? I'm not against alcohol at all. I think it's important (if you're not an alcoholic) that you drink responsibly. I don't think it's irresponsible to have alcohol at events, but I also think there's a fine line to promoting events and getting people to attend them, versus just having an event where alcohol is the center and draw of the event.
What is the right approach if you know someone who consistently gets drunk?
Wait until they're not under the influence and have a one-on-one conversation with solutions on hand. The conversation should be methodically rehearsed to start with a positive statement regarding your affiliation with them, something along these lines, "We work together and your work product is excellent. However, I noticed this and I have noticed it before. I value you as a person and it appears you're struggling. I'm not an expert in the field, but I know there are folks that may be able to help you navigate this. Would you be open and willing to speak with them?" And then at the end of the conversation say, "and if I'm wrong, I apologize, I just care." There's no way to get that wrong. Do not diagnose them and do not laundry list the things you have noticed as that will only cause them to get defensive and at that point you have lost their attention.
Along the lines of Dry January, if someone makes a New Year's resolution to stop drinking or doing drugs, is that unlikely to succeed?
Abstaining from consuming drugs and not drinking is a lifestyle. It's not a decision you make for a period of time. And if you need to make that decision, you're trying to control a behavior that needs to be looked at. I stopped for a month when I went to rehab and what did I do when I got out? I went right back to it with a vengeance. So, periods of abstaining definitely are not indicative of a lack of problems.
What did jail do that rehab doesn't?
I always say the greatest prison I was ever in was the prison of active addiction. My first taste of freedom was actually physical confinement. It was time. It was the amount of time in jail. I wasn't given detox meds. It wasn't made comfortable for me. There weren't cushy family Sunday visits. I was a number like everybody else. When I walked in the door, I'm like, 'I'm an attorney. How can you keep me here?' And they're like, 'you're an inmate. Here's your number. Here's your uniform.' Jail forced me to take my 'uniquers' off.
What signs would indicate that a person has a problem as opposed to somebody who just drinks or takes drugs, but is not an addict?
When someone's life becomes unmanageable, that is a great indicator of a problem. When things that used to matter to people no longer really matter. A disinterest in things that someone used to enjoy. Hobbies become less important, family obligations become less important. Pulling away from people. Missing deadlines, missing things and not having a reason why. I wouldn't go to family functions because I wasn't capable of showing up.
Do you have any thoughts about why this is such a problem in law schools and in law firms and in the law?
Well, I think the law and culture of the legal environment teaches us it's very black and white, all or nothing, win, lose—a lot of pressure. And we are paid to solve everyone's problems. That's why I thought I could think my way out of it. We're taught that we are the problem solvers. I believe that is why the prevalence rates are so high in the legal profession. That's why it's so difficult for people in our profession to ask for help. I really think our training works against wellness in a large sense.
How did you reinvent yourself professionally?
I actually can't take credit for reinventing anything. It was consequences and the gift of desperation. The credit goes to Judge William R. Carpenter of the Montgomery County Court of Common Pleas, my sentencing judge, who saved my life by giving me the one gift that my family could not buy and that was TIME; coupled with J. David Farrell, (volunteer with LCL) simultaneously bringing me the message of recovery. Looking back at my journey, it is obvious to me this was all meant to be.
Besden's story is one of reckoning, resilience and reinvention. She was reinstated to the Pennsylvania and New Jersey bars and her gubernatorial pardon hearing was held Dec. 18, 2019, where the Board of Pardon voted 5-0 to recommend to the governor that her clemency application be granted. Jan. 29 marks her 16th year of sobriety.
Besden regularly speaks at law schools, judicial events, bar associations and law firms. One of her most potent points is that we are all capable of making the difference in someone's life.
LCL has a 24-hour confidential hotline: 1-888-999-1941. If you know someone who is struggling or you are, call right now.
Dena Lefkowitz is a certified professional coach who helps clients improve networking and marketing skills, make successful career transitions, and develop the skills necessary to lead. Having practiced law for 25 years in private practice and in-house, she understands the challenges new and seasoned lawyers face. Lefkowitz has successfully coached a best-selling author, lawyers, accountants and chief executives. Firms have also hired Lefkowitz to work directly with lawyers at all phases of their careers to improve performance and increase their contributions to the firm. For more information, visit www.achievementbydesign.com.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllThe Forgotten Ballot: Expanding Voting Access for Incarcerated Populations
5 minute readRemembering Am Law 100 Firm Founder and 'Force of Nature' Stephen Cozen
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250