AMC Hit With $3.15M Verdict Over Woman's Fall in Movie Theater
The plaintiff said that AMC violated its own safety policies and failed to take a photo of the area where the fall occurred until three days after the incident.
January 30, 2020 at 05:47 PM
4 minute read
A Philadelphia jury has awarded nearly $3.15 million to an elderly woman who fractured her hip while trying to find seats in an AMC movie theater in Montgomery County.
The jury handed up the verdict Tuesday after a five-day trial before Philadelphia Court of Common Pleas Judge Sean Kennedy. Despite arguments that the 78-year-old plaintiff was comparatively negligent, the jury found the theater company to be 100% at fault for the incident.
"After a nearly two-and-a-half-year battle in the court system, justice was finally served for my client, who suffers and continues to suffer as a result of AMC's negligent conduct," attorney Franklin Strokoff of The Rothenberg Law Firm said. Strokoff represented plaintiff Mary Hozey.
According to Hozey's pretrial memo, on March 1, 2016, Hozey surprised her 83-year-old sister, who lived in an assisted living community, by taking her to lunch and a movie at the AMC theater in Plymouth Meeting. Since her sister uses a walker, Hozey selected seats reserved for persons with disabilities when purchasing the tickets, the memo said. The memo said the women entered the theater after the movie had started, and Hozey told her sister to wait at the landing while she looked for the assigned seats.
The memo said that, as Hozey was looking for a seat, she attempted to walk forward, but stepped into nothing and then fell onto her left side. According to the memo, Hozey had not seen the "unmarked, unlit step" until after she fell and the lights came up.
According to the memo, while she waited for EMS, an AMC employee told Hozey that people had previously fallen on that step, and one of the theater guests said that six people had previously fallen in the same location. The memo said another woman had also fallen in the same spot two days before Hozey's fall.
"Outrageously, absolutely no action was taken between the time of Gertrude Palicki's fall and Ms. Hozey's fall two days later," the memo said.
The memo also said that AMC violated its own safety policies and failed to take a photo of the area where the fall occurred until three days after the incident. According to the memo, the lights near where Hozey fell were not working in the photograph.
In its pretrial memo, AMC contended that Hozey had previously been in the same auditorium, and should have been aware of the step, but had not been paying attention before she fell. The company also said there had not been any concerns about the step, and the area was properly illuminated from above and with white plastic lighting strips.
AMC also brought Lickel Architecture into the case. The company had designed the theater when it underwent a renovation in 2015.
In its pretrial memo, Lickel argued that Hozey was comparatively negligent, and that the theater is designed nearly identically to all other AMC theaters throughout the country, which meet all building codes and standards under the Americans with Disabilities Act.
After the fall, Hozey was taken to Einstein Montgomery Hospital, where she was diagnosed with a displaced hip fracture. She underwent surgery and was kept in the hospital for five days, but she subsequently underwent five surgeries and seven hospitalizations as a result of the broken hip, the memo said.
The memo also said that, Hozey, a widow, had undergone gastric bypass surgery in 2013, and had since become active in the lives of her children and grand children, including traveling to Alaska in 2015.
According to the memos, the plaintiff demanded $3.9 million, and AMC did not make any offers. AMC's memo also noted it was self-insured up to $1 million, and had a $4 million excess policy with ACE American Insurance.
According to Strokoff, the jury deliberated for about an hour before delivering its verdict.
AMC was represented by Ralph Luongo of Kennedys Law, and O'Connor Kimball lawyer Thomas Gregory represented Lickel.
Gregory said he was not shocked by the verdict.
"The way it shook out was the way I saw it all along," Gregory said. "I thought there was liability on the part of the theater and thought there was no liability on my client, the architect."
Luongo declined to comment for the story.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllEx-DLA Piper, Ballard Spahr Atty Accused of Aiding Video Game Company Founder's Misappropriation Scheme
5 minute readFrom M&A to Music Fest, Ballard Spahr Attorney Hosts Week-Long Jam Session With Help of Clients
5 minute read$43.5M Med Mal Verdict for Ex-Eagles Team Captain Withstands Appellate Challenge
Pa. Casinos Ask Court to Force State to Tax Skill Games Found in Stores Equally to Slots
3 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250