Father, Son Pinned in Vehicle Parking Lot Crash Get $1.05M
On April 4, 2017, plaintiff Stanley Kanyuck, 43, a security guard, and his father, plaintiff Stephen Kanyuck, 72, were exiting their vehicle in a parking lot in Bethlehem. A sport utility vehicle crashed into a shopping cart corral and into other vehicles, pinning the Kanyucks in their vehicle.
January 30, 2020 at 03:29 PM
4 minute read
Kanyuck v. Progressive Casualty Insurance
$1.05M Verdict
Date of Verdict: Dec. 11, 2019.
Court and Case No.: C.P. Monroe No. No. 83CV2018.
Judge: David Williamson.
Type of Action: Motor vehicle.
Injuries: Leg, pelvis fractures.
Plaintiffs Counsel: Thomas J. Foley III and Michael J. Foley, Foley Law Firm.
Plaintiffs Experts: Scott E. Sexton, orthopedic surgery, Allentown; Andrew C. Verzilli, economics, Lansdale; William R. Prebola Jr., physical medicine, Wilkes-Barre; Patricia A. Chilleri, vocational rehabilitation, Kingston.
Defense Counsel: G. Christopher Parrish, Forry | Ullman Attorneys at Law, Bethlehem.
Defense Experts: P. Christopher Metzger, orthopedic surgery, Dickson City; John W. Dieckman, vocational rehabilitation.
Comment:
On April 4, 2017, plaintiff Stanley Kanyuck, 43, a security guard, and his father, plaintiff Stephen Kanyuck, 72, were exiting their vehicle in a parking lot in Bethlehem. A sport utility vehicle crashed into a shopping cart corral and into other vehicles, pinning the Kanyucks in their vehicle. Stanley Kanyuck suffered pelvis fractures; Stephen Kanyuck suffered leg fractures. The Kanyucks settled with the driver's insurer for $225,000, from a policy that provided $250,000 of coverage.
The Kanyucks sued their insurer, Progressive Casualty Insurance Co. They sought to recover their underinsured-motorist policy of $325,000.
During the early stages of the trial, Stephen Kanyuck settled with Progressive for $250,000. Progressive stipulated to liability, and the case was tried on the issues of Stanley Kanyuck's alleged injuries and damages.
Stanley Kanyuck was taken by ambulance to a hospital and was admitted. He was diagnosed with four nondisplaced fractures and one minimally displaced fracture of his pelvis. Kanyuck was immobilized and remained hospitalized for five days, through April 9, 2017. He was then transferred to a rehabilitation facility and treated on an inpatient basis, through April 22.
Upon discharge, Kanyuck came under the care of an orthopedic surgeon and treated with extensive physical therapy. At the time of trial, Kanyuck treated with a pain management doctor who prescribed medical marijuana. Kanyuck saw his orthopedic surgeon intermittently. Kanyuck's experts in orthopedic surgery and physical medicine testified that Kanyuck suffered a permanent injury to his pelvis due to the accident, and that he is at risk for developing arthritis in his pelvis and hips. The experts opined that Kanyuck requires indefinite pain management. Kanyuck's expert in vocational rehabilitation testified that Kanyuck had a 50% loss of earning capacity as a result of his injury. The expert noted that Kanyuck earned$23,000 annually as a security guard, after having worked in the position for 11 years.
Kanyuck testified that he has constant pelvic pain and has to walk with a cane. In addition to not being able to work, he contended, he is limited in his activities of daily living and spends his days at home. Kanyuck sought to recover approximately $140,000 in future medical costs, in excess of $400,000 in future lost earning capacity, and damages for past and future pain and suffering.
The defense's expert in orthopedic surgery testified that Kanyuck's factures would have healed within 12 weeks of the accident. Kanyuck would not need any future treatment unless he developed hip arthritis, which he thought was unlikely, the expert opined.
The defense's expert in vocational rehabilitation testified that Kanyuck was physically capable of employment and could work in a number of positions. According to the expert, Kanyuck could perform jobs of clerks and receptionists with annual earnings of $27,550; tellers with annual earnings of $28,210; customer service representatives with annual earnings of $34,140; and billing and posting clerks with annual earnings of $36,000.
The expert also noted that Kanyuck earned an associate's degree in computers in 2003 and that he has an understanding of technology. Both were factors in favor of him gaining new employment.
Kanyuck's counsel argued that Kanyuck's 2003 degree in computers has no value, because technology had changed rapidly in the past 16 years.
The jury found that the underlying tortfeasor's negligence was a factual cause of injury to Kanyuck. He was determined to receive $1.05 million.
This report is based on information that was provided by plaintiffs counsel. Defense counsel did not respond to calls for comment.
—This report first appeared in VerdictSearch, an ALM publication
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllJudge Approves $667K Settlement Against Independence Blue Cross for Unpaid, Pre-Shift Computer Work
4 minute readThird Circuit Predicts Pa. High Court's Application of 'Gallagher' and 'Donovan' in 'Mid-Century Insurance v. Werley'
12 minute read$8M Settlement Reached in Wrongful Death, Negligence Suits Against Phila. Foster Agency
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1The Pusillanimous Press
- 2Contract Lifecycle Management Company ContractPodAi Unveils Leah Drive
- 3'Great News' for Businesses? Judge Halts Transparency Mandate
- 4Consilio Announces ‘Native AI Review,’ Expanding Its Gen AI E-Discovery Offerings
- 5Federal Judge Hits US With $227,000 Sanction for Discovery Misconduct
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250