Father, Son Pinned in Vehicle Parking Lot Crash Get $1.05M
On April 4, 2017, plaintiff Stanley Kanyuck, 43, a security guard, and his father, plaintiff Stephen Kanyuck, 72, were exiting their vehicle in a parking lot in Bethlehem. A sport utility vehicle crashed into a shopping cart corral and into other vehicles, pinning the Kanyucks in their vehicle.
January 30, 2020 at 03:29 PM
4 minute read
Kanyuck v. Progressive Casualty Insurance
$1.05M Verdict
Date of Verdict: Dec. 11, 2019.
Court and Case No.: C.P. Monroe No. No. 83CV2018.
Judge: David Williamson.
Type of Action: Motor vehicle.
Injuries: Leg, pelvis fractures.
Plaintiffs Counsel: Thomas J. Foley III and Michael J. Foley, Foley Law Firm.
Plaintiffs Experts: Scott E. Sexton, orthopedic surgery, Allentown; Andrew C. Verzilli, economics, Lansdale; William R. Prebola Jr., physical medicine, Wilkes-Barre; Patricia A. Chilleri, vocational rehabilitation, Kingston.
Defense Counsel: G. Christopher Parrish, Forry | Ullman Attorneys at Law, Bethlehem.
Defense Experts: P. Christopher Metzger, orthopedic surgery, Dickson City; John W. Dieckman, vocational rehabilitation.
Comment:
On April 4, 2017, plaintiff Stanley Kanyuck, 43, a security guard, and his father, plaintiff Stephen Kanyuck, 72, were exiting their vehicle in a parking lot in Bethlehem. A sport utility vehicle crashed into a shopping cart corral and into other vehicles, pinning the Kanyucks in their vehicle. Stanley Kanyuck suffered pelvis fractures; Stephen Kanyuck suffered leg fractures. The Kanyucks settled with the driver's insurer for $225,000, from a policy that provided $250,000 of coverage.
The Kanyucks sued their insurer, Progressive Casualty Insurance Co. They sought to recover their underinsured-motorist policy of $325,000.
During the early stages of the trial, Stephen Kanyuck settled with Progressive for $250,000. Progressive stipulated to liability, and the case was tried on the issues of Stanley Kanyuck's alleged injuries and damages.
Stanley Kanyuck was taken by ambulance to a hospital and was admitted. He was diagnosed with four nondisplaced fractures and one minimally displaced fracture of his pelvis. Kanyuck was immobilized and remained hospitalized for five days, through April 9, 2017. He was then transferred to a rehabilitation facility and treated on an inpatient basis, through April 22.
Upon discharge, Kanyuck came under the care of an orthopedic surgeon and treated with extensive physical therapy. At the time of trial, Kanyuck treated with a pain management doctor who prescribed medical marijuana. Kanyuck saw his orthopedic surgeon intermittently. Kanyuck's experts in orthopedic surgery and physical medicine testified that Kanyuck suffered a permanent injury to his pelvis due to the accident, and that he is at risk for developing arthritis in his pelvis and hips. The experts opined that Kanyuck requires indefinite pain management. Kanyuck's expert in vocational rehabilitation testified that Kanyuck had a 50% loss of earning capacity as a result of his injury. The expert noted that Kanyuck earned$23,000 annually as a security guard, after having worked in the position for 11 years.
Kanyuck testified that he has constant pelvic pain and has to walk with a cane. In addition to not being able to work, he contended, he is limited in his activities of daily living and spends his days at home. Kanyuck sought to recover approximately $140,000 in future medical costs, in excess of $400,000 in future lost earning capacity, and damages for past and future pain and suffering.
The defense's expert in orthopedic surgery testified that Kanyuck's factures would have healed within 12 weeks of the accident. Kanyuck would not need any future treatment unless he developed hip arthritis, which he thought was unlikely, the expert opined.
The defense's expert in vocational rehabilitation testified that Kanyuck was physically capable of employment and could work in a number of positions. According to the expert, Kanyuck could perform jobs of clerks and receptionists with annual earnings of $27,550; tellers with annual earnings of $28,210; customer service representatives with annual earnings of $34,140; and billing and posting clerks with annual earnings of $36,000.
The expert also noted that Kanyuck earned an associate's degree in computers in 2003 and that he has an understanding of technology. Both were factors in favor of him gaining new employment.
Kanyuck's counsel argued that Kanyuck's 2003 degree in computers has no value, because technology had changed rapidly in the past 16 years.
The jury found that the underlying tortfeasor's negligence was a factual cause of injury to Kanyuck. He was determined to receive $1.05 million.
This report is based on information that was provided by plaintiffs counsel. Defense counsel did not respond to calls for comment.
—This report first appeared in VerdictSearch, an ALM publication
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllPhiladelphia Eagles 0-2 in Attempts to Recover Insurance on COVID-Related Losses
4 minute readHigh Verdicts and Venue Rule Land Pa. Courts on Top of 'Judicial Hellhole' List
5 minute readJudge Approves $667K Settlement Against Independence Blue Cross for Unpaid, Pre-Shift Computer Work
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1DC Bar’s Proposed Anti-Discrimination, Harassment Conduct Rule Sees More Pushback
- 2California's Chief Justice Starts Third Year With Questions About Fires, Trump and AI
- 3Justin Baldoni Sues Blake Lively and Ryan Reynolds for $400M in New Step in 'It Ends With Us' Fight
- 4Top Leadership Changes Coming for NJ Attorney General's Office
- 5SCOTUSBlog Co-Founder Tom Goldstein Misused Law Firm Funds, According to Federal Indictment
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250