Duane Morris Finalizes Merger With Satterlee Stephens, Adding 65 in NY
The combined firm will have projected annual revenue of $550 million.
February 03, 2020 at 03:27 PM
4 minute read
Duane Morris and Satterlee Stephens officially tied the knot over the weekend, growing the Philadelphia-based Am Law 100 firm's presence in New York by more than 60%.
According to Matthew Taylor, chairman of Duane Morris, the two firms officially signed off on the deal, with the merger becoming effective midnight Feb. 1. He said lawyers from Satterlee were working under the Duane Morris banner on Saturday morning, as office and technology integration had already begun in January.
The combined firm will have annual gross revenue of at least $550 million, Taylor said, based on both firms' financial performance in prior years. According to preliminary law firm financial data from ALM Intelligence, Duane Morris grew revenue to more than $510 million in 2019 and profits per equity partner were north of $1 million for the second year.
"We were very happy with the year," Taylor said.
Duane Morris, which had about 800 lawyers pre-merger, entered the New York market about 25 years ago and built its presence there to just under 100 lawyers before merging with Satterlee, which adds about 65 lawyers to the firm. Total personnel added number about 100, Taylor said.
The firm will maintain two offices in New York, including Satterlee's location at 230 Park Ave. and Duane Morris' office in Times Square. But in about 60 days, Taylor said, some Satterlee lawyers will move to Times Square and some Duane Morris lawyers will move to Park Avenue, as part of the firms' practice integration plans.
"Everyone's eager to mix it up," Taylor said, noting that more lawyers than necessary have already volunteered to move.
Post-merger, James Coster, chair of Satterlee's executive committee, will become co-managing partner of Duane Morris' New York offices, along with current office leader Michael Grohman. Coster will also join Duane Morris' board, and will be head of the firm's global securities litigation division.
Other Satterlee partners have taken on leadership roles as well, Taylor said. James Regan will be vice chair of the securities litigation group, Jennifer McArdle will be vice chair of the commercial and antitrust litigation division, and Amy Guss will be vice chair of the private client services group.
One other partner will be named to the firm's board as well, Taylor noted, but who that will be is not yet determined. Having multiple Satterlee partners on Duane Morris' board was seen as a key part of the integration plan, he said.
Taylor said he plans to meet with each of Satterlee's lawyers and staff members over the next week. And, he noted, clients have already been brought into the fold. Even when the two firms were still in talks, he said, some legacy Duane Morris clients were getting help from Satterlee lawyers, and some legacy Satterlee clients were using Duane Morris services, particularly in London, Delaware, San Francisco and Texas.
"It's nice to see proof of concept already, not one full official work day in, that we've got a lot of flow of commerce back and forth already," Taylor said.
By combining with Satterlee, Duane Morris is adding lawyers who have served large financial institutions and corporations in complex commercial litigation. In particular, the firm's partners have advised Moody's, Oppenheimer & Co., JPMorgan Chase, IBM, Exxon, Johnson & Johnson, Bank of Montreal, Investors Bank, Stifel Nicolaus and Co. and Calvin Klein Inc., according to the firm's website and court records. Taylor and Coster previously said Duane Morris and Satterlee share several banking and insurance industry clients.
Taylor said the firm is continuing to plan growth in other markets as well, and will likely announce some additions in London by the beginning of March.
Also over the weekend, Am Law 100 firms Faegre Baker Daniels and Drinker Biddle & Reath officially merged, as planned, on Feb. 1.
|Read More
Duane Morris, NY-Based Satterlee Stephens to Merge in February
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSpecial Section: Products Liability, Mass Torts & Class Action/Personal Injury
2 minute readThe Products Liability Case Against Tianeptine: The Deadly ‘Dietary Supplement’ Found at Your Local Store
9 minute readThe Evolving Landscape of Joint and Several Liability in Pa.: A Post-'Spencer' Analysis
5 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Weil Practice Leaders Expected to Leave for Paul Weiss, Latham
- 2Senators Grill Visa, Mastercard Execs on Alleged Anti-Competitive Practices, Fees
- 3Deal Watch: Gibson Dunn, V&E, Kirkland Lead Big Energy Deals in Another Strong Week in Transactions
- 4Advisory Opinion Offers 'Road Map' for Judges Defending Against Campaign Attacks
- 5Commencement of Child Victims Act at Heart of Federal Question Posed to NY's Top Court
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250