Life Sciences and Medical Tech Legal Trends for 2020
The life sciences and medical technology space is growing rapidly; trends in this space for 2020 reflect this growth. This article addresses the trends to expect, and how that may impact the work their attorneys will be facing in 2020 and beyond.
February 14, 2020 at 01:37 PM
6 minute read
The life sciences and medical technology space is growing rapidly; trends in this space for 2020 reflect this growth. This article addresses the trends to expect, and how that may impact the work their attorneys will be facing in 2020 and beyond.
- Data can be A client's most important asset.
For some time, life sciences companies have been collecting information without an efficient means to monetize the data. Increasingly, artificial intelligence (AI) and machine-learning tools are informing the analytics companies can provide their customers using this data. These technologies are impacting research, testing, patient care, diagnostics, therapeutic approaches and outpatient care. They provide alternative revenue streams, but also complicate partnerships necessary for development, growth and marketing. Attorneys representing life sciences companies will need to not only be aware of data development and ownership considerations in development, partnership, customer and vendor agreements, but proactively educate themselves on the potential uses of such data. Frequently, the value of data becomes apparent to a client well after the contract is executed—and it will be up to the attorney to raise these issues for consideration beforehand. This will be complicated by the patchwork quilt of data privacy laws that these companies face; HIPAA, common law, the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA) and more will all need to be considered to ensure that a client's data needs are not curtailed.
AI and machine-learning medical tech products that evolve and develop on their own during use by patients or consumers are also emerging. The FDA has already begun working on a new streamlined method of 510,000 approvals for AI and machine-learning products that evolve out of their approved specifications. Medical tech device attorneys will need to be aware of the development of these regulations and advise their clients accordingly.
- Business models are changing.
Software-as-a-Service (SaaS) business models are increasing, both in acceptance by the market and by life sciences and medical technology companies. As the market increasingly recognizes that access and control of data is more efficient in the cloud, and increasingly values the regular security updates, feature add-ons and connectivity of SaaS products, the market share and profitability of SaaS companies grows. Master service agreements, scope of work addenda and other documents will become routine in these companies' transactions.
Value-based pricing, bundle billing and the basing reimbursements on community health instead of fee-for-service is putting significant negative pressure on health care providers' profitability. This will lead to business opportunities for life sciences and med tech companies as they pivot to provide savings and efficiencies as part of their offerings. In turn, percentage-of-savings fees and other contract terms will become normalized.
As larger health organizations seek to reduce expenses, group purchasing organizations (GPOs) are having an increased effect on the market; contracts with GPOs will become more important to life sciences and med tech clients. Once a GPO contract is in place, contracts with GPO members will not need to be negotiated separately. However, many GPO contracts contain strong protections for their members, including "most favored nation" pricing clauses, which will require attorneys to ensure that subsequent client contracts do not create breaches of existing GPO contracts.
- Hot products gain maturity.
Wearables have been a buzzword for years; 2020 may be the year they achieve some maturity in the market. This trend may be supported by the movement of inpatient procedures to outpatient facilities, an increase in home health care and increased interconnectivity of unrelated health care teams taking care of shared patients. Wearables have primarily been focused on self-care; emerging growth companies are developing wearables that create greater self-sufficiency in users while providing transparent oversight and monitoring for caregivers. This maturing of wearables from a self-focused product to one spanning the needs of multiple types of consumers will continue.
Analytics in diagnostics, radiology, community health and predictive/prevention products and services have been growing in sophistication and evidence-based support for their efficacy. Expect 2020 to show many small leaps for these technologies, especially as some legacy technologies are combined and leveraged with emerging technologies.
Cybersecurity products will grow in their impact on the life sciences/med tech space; as data becomes more important, data privacy laws are proliferating. Compliance will become a significant part of practice for attorneys advising these companies, especially as these clients routinely practice across many states' lines. National legislation on data security appears inevitable—but likely years down the road.
Advising clients on proactive planning and compliance is likely to become a requirement of competent practice; be aware that many clients, especially emerging growth entities, will push back due to lack of funds and bandwidth. Documenting your advice and engaging in effective communications strategies with your clients will become increasingly important.
|Conclusion
Look for the above trends to merge. Maturing existing medical technologies by shrinking their size, reducing the number of staff necessary to use them and increasing their ease of use, will lead to more revenue for providers and accelerate the growth of in-office clinical procedures—coupled with the ability to acquire the hardware on a SaaS-style procedure-based fee structure, eliminating large upfront costs. Transactions and business models monetizing data collected by these technologies and expanding wearable and other personal devices for data collection purposes will increasingly become a tangled web due to the wide range of data privacy laws emerging state by state.
These developments will require attorneys representing med tech and life sciences companies to widen their focus on data privacy, licensing and other issues relating to data in order to not only draft transactional documents, but to advise clients on business plans, required team members, the benefits and dangers of proposed corporate transactions and more. Educating yourself in both these legal developments and the emerging technology landscape underlying them will give you an edge in providing value to your client.
Christopher Ezold is a partner in the business, corporate and tax practice group of Wisler, Pearlstine, as well as an assistant director of the firm's general counsel initiative. Ezold acts as outside general counsel to companies in the biotech, life sciences, health care, emerging growth and technology industries. He is also a sponsor of the Mid-Atlantic Region of The Keiretsu Forum, the world's largest angel investment group. Contact him at [email protected].
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Grave Matter of Serious Consequences': Why a Missouri Judge Sanctioned a Top Kirkland & Ellis Attorney
10 minute readMorgan Lewis Snatches Up Former Orrick Partner in Boston
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1AI: An Enhancement, Not a Replacement for Attorneys
- 2Fowler White Burnett Opens Jacksonville Office Focused on Transportation Practice
- 3Auditor Finds 'Significant Deficiency' in FTC Accounting to Tune of $7M
- 4'A Mockery' of Deposition Rules: Walgreens Wins Sanctions Dispute Over Corporate Witness Allegedly Unfamiliar With Company
- 5Call for Nominations: TLI's Pennsylvania Legal Awards 2025
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250