Man Injured in Forklift Collision Settles Claims for $3 Million
According to the pretrial memo, the plaintiffs' liability expert concluded the employer failed to properly train operators, and failed to properly identify the potential hazards of traveling through the K-Dock area.
February 18, 2020 at 05:06 PM
4 minute read
A man who suffered complete fractures of the two long bones in his leg and sustained nerve damage in a collision between two forklifts has agreed to settle his claims against the warehouse owner where the accident occurred for $3 million.
Gerald Baldino of Sacchetta & Baldino, who represented Gaulberto Rivas-Reyes, along with Timothy Daly of Daly & Clemente, secured the settlement with Crescent Park Corp. over allegations that the company failed to properly train its employee about how to properly use a forklift.
The case had been set to come before a jury in the Philadelphia Court of Common Pleas, but was settled in the lead-up to trial. No judge had yet been selected to handle the trial.
Baldino said he believed the defendants were inclined to settle the case because the plaintiffs had established through discovery that the defendant allegedly violated both internal safety policies and U.S. Occupational Safety and Health Administration standards. However, he said there appeared to be a coverage dispute, and so there had not been any settlement discussions until three days before jury selection.
According to Rivas-Reyes' pretrial memo, the plaintiff was temporarily working at the direction of his employer, At Work Personnel, in Crescent Park's warehouse shipping facility in Mechanicsburg. The memo said Rivas-Reyes was moving cargo with a forklift, entering an area of the warehouse called the "K-Dock area," when defendant Nesim Tawadrous, a Crescent Park employee, ran the forklift he was driving into Rivas-Reyes. According to the memo, one of the forks on Tawadrous' lift struck Rivas-Reyes about six to eight inches above his knee.
The memo said Tawadrous was driving in the opposite direction as Rivas-Reyes with the forks facing forward. The forks on Tawadrous' forklift, the memo said, had been elevated about 18 inches above floor level. According to the memo, Rivas-Reyes said he hadn't expected that Tawadrous would be driving at him, since forklift drivers are instructed not to drive with the forks facing forward, and that Tawadrous came so quickly he was unable to swerve out of the way.
As a result of the collision, Rivas-Reyes suffered a complete fracture of his left tibia and fibula, and underwent several surgeries, including a bone graft. He subsequently treated with physical therapy, but contended that he continued to suffer from nerve damage, weakness, scarring and loss of range of motion, as well as anxiety and depression.
Rivas-Reyes sued Crescent Park, contending that Tawadrous had been negligent and not been properly trained to use a forklift. The plaintiff also sued the lessor of the forklifts, but eventually discontinued those claims.
The plaintiffs memo said Tawadrous testified that before the accident he was having chest pain and was under emotional pressure since his supervisors were "loading [him] with work."
According to the pretrial memo, plaintiffs liability expert Robert Jasinski concluded the employer failed to properly train operators, and failed to properly identify the potential hazards of traveling through the K-Dock area.
Terry Leslie, Rivas-Reyes' vocational expert, opined that the plaintiff has no post-injury earning capacity, and expert economist Andrew Verzilli said Rivas-Reyes suffered an economic loss between $2.7 million and $3.1 million.
In its memo, Crescent Park contended that Rivas-Reyes had not been allowed into the K- Dock area, and that several days before the collision, Rivas-Reyes had been involved in another collision involving a forklift.
According to Baldino, Rivas-Reyes, who was 28 when the accident occurred, had been working to support his wife and 2-year-old son in Puerto Rico when the accident occurred.
"I'm very gratified that my client, who goes by Tito, that he's going to have the money he's going to need to provide for his family considering his limited earning capacity," Baldino said.
Counsel for the defendants, William Cilingin of Naulty, Scaricamazza & McDevitt, did not return a message seeking comment.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllBlank Rome Snags Two Labor and Employment Partners From Stevens & Lee
4 minute read12-Partner Team 'Surprises' Atlanta Firm’s Leaders With Exit to Launch New Reed Smith Office
4 minute readMorgan Lewis Shutters Shenzhen Office Less Than Two Years After Launch
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1'A Death Sentence for TikTok'?: Litigators and Experts Weigh Impact of Potential Ban on Creators and Data Privacy
- 2Bribery Case Against Former Lt. Gov. Brian Benjamin Is Dropped
- 3‘Extremely Disturbing’: AI Firms Face Class Action by ‘Taskers’ Exposed to Traumatic Content
- 4State Appeals Court Revives BraunHagey Lawsuit Alleging $4.2M Unlawful Wire to China
- 5Invoking Trump, AG Bonta Reminds Lawyers of Duties to Noncitizens in Plea Dealing
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250