$3M Settlement for Man Injured in Forklift Collision
A man who suffered complete fractures of the two long bones in his leg and sustained nerve damage in a collision between two forklifts has agreed to settle his claims against the warehouse owner where the accident occurred for $3 million.
February 20, 2020 at 02:20 PM
4 minute read
Rivas-Reyes v. Crescent Park
$3M Settlement
Date of Settlement: Feb. 18.
Court and Case No.: C.P. Philadelphia No. 180300156.
Type of Action: Personal injury.
Injuries: Leg fractures, nerve damage.
Plaintiffs Counsel: Gerald Baldino, Sacchetta & Baldino, Media; Timothy Daly, Daly & Clemente, Phoenixville.
Defense Counsel: William Cilingin of Naulty, Scaricamazza & McDevitt, Philadelphia.
Comment:
A man who suffered complete fractures of the two long bones in his leg and sustained nerve damage in a collision between two forklifts has agreed to settle his claims against the warehouse owner where the accident occurred for $3 million.
Gerald Baldino of Sacchetta & Baldino, who represented Gaulberto Rivas-Reyes, along with Timothy Daly of Daly & Clemente, secured the settlement with Crescent Park Corp. over allegations that the company failed to properly train its employee about how to properly use a forklift.
The case had been set to come before a jury in the Philadelphia Court of Common Pleas, but was settled in the lead-up to trial. No judge had yet been selected to handle the trial.
Baldino said he believed the defendants were inclined to settle the case because the plaintiffs had established through discovery that the defendant allegedly violated both internal safety policies and U.S. Occupational Safety and Health Administration standards. However, he said there appeared to be a coverage dispute, and so there had not been any settlement discussions until three days before jury selection.
According to Rivas-Reyes' pretrial memo, the plaintiff was temporarily working at the direction of his employer, At Work Personnel, in Crescent Park's warehouse shipping facility in Mechanicsburg. The memo said Rivas-Reyes was moving cargo with a forklift, entering an area of the warehouse called the "K-Dock area," when defendant Nesim Tawadrous, a Crescent Park employee, ran the forklift he was driving into Rivas-Reyes. According to the memo, one of the forks on Tawadrous' lift struck Rivas-Reyes about six to eight inches above his knee.
The memo said Tawadrous was driving in the opposite direction as Rivas-Reyes with the forks facing forward. The forks on Tawadrous' forklift, the memo said, had been elevated about 18 inches above floor level. According to the memo, Rivas-Reyes said he hadn't expected that Tawadrous would be driving at him, since forklift drivers are instructed not to drive with the forks facing forward, and that Tawadrous came so quickly he was unable to swerve out of the way.
As a result of the collision, Rivas-Reyes suffered a complete fracture of his left tibia and fibula, and underwent several surgeries, including a bone graft. He subsequently treated with physical therapy, but contended that he continued to suffer from nerve damage, weakness, scarring and loss of range of motion, as well as anxiety and depression.
Rivas-Reyes sued Crescent Park, contending that Tawadrous had been negligent and not been properly trained to use a forklift. The plaintiff also sued the lessor of the forklifts, but eventually discontinued those claims.
The plaintiffs memo said Tawadrous testified that before the accident he was having chest pain and was under emotional pressure since his supervisors were "loading [him] with work."
According to the pretrial memo, plaintiffs liability expert Robert Jasinski concluded the employer failed to properly train operators, and failed to properly identify the potential hazards of traveling through the K-Dock area.
Terry Leslie, Rivas-Reyes' vocational expert, opined that the plaintiff has no post-injury earning capacity, and expert economist Andrew Verzilli said Rivas-Reyes suffered an economic loss between $2.7 million and $3.1 million.
In its memo, Crescent Park contended that Rivas-Reyes had not been allowed into the K- Dock area, and that several days before the collision, Rivas-Reyes had been involved in another collision involving a forklift.
According to Baldino, Rivas-Reyes, who was 28 when the accident occurred, had been working to support his wife and 2-year-old son in Puerto Rico when the accident occurred.
Counsel for the defendants, William Cilingin of Naulty, Scaricamazza & McDevitt, did not return a message seeking comment.
—Max Mitchell, of the Law Weekly
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllPa. Federal District Courts Reach Full Complement Following Latest Confirmation
The Defense Bar Is Feeling the Strain: Busy Med Mal Trial Schedules Might Be Phila.'s 'New Normal'
7 minute readFederal Judge Allows Elderly Woman's Consumer Protection Suit to Proceed Against Citizens Bank
5 minute readJudge Leaves Statute of Limitations Question in Injury Crash Suit for a Jury
4 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250