Duane Morris Posted Revenue, Profit Gains While Courting Merger
The firm grew revenue 3.8% and profits per equity partner 5.1% amid talks for its recent combination with Satterlee Stephens.
February 24, 2020 at 03:08 PM
4 minute read
As it negotiated a key merger in New York that came to fruition early this year, Duane Morris surpassed the half-billion mark in gross revenue last year, and managed to boost partner profits despite growth in the equity partner tier.
The firm saw revenue growth of 3.8%, from $491.6 million in 2018 to $510.3 million last year, while revenue per lawyer increased by 5.9%, to $775,000.
As net income grew by 6.7% to $136 million on a slightly wider profit margin, profits per equity partner were up 5.1%, reaching $1.06 million. Duane Morris surpassed PEP of $1 million for the first time in 2018.
Firm chairman Matt Taylor said the 2019 performance adds to more than a decade of sustained growth for the firm. "That consistency is a big part of our story," he said.
Factoring into revenue and profits was a rate increase of 4-4.5%, Taylor said. The firm didn't make any specific cost-cutting moves, he said, but continued to lean on an operations and finance team that brought costs in under budget.
One expense that increased was associate salaries, which increased to $180,000 for first-years in the firm's larger markets, Taylor said.
Asked further about the increase in RPL, Taylor said Duane Morris has shifted to an industry-focused strategy, which has held lawyers drive more revenue, particularly in corporate practices and in the nonequity partner tier.
"We've got more nonequity partners than equity partners, as most firms do in our peer group, and to see our nonequity partners get busier and more productive was really good to see," he said.
The firm saw head count decrease by 2%, to 658, which Taylor said was expected due to some moves in-house, some "managed departures," and some planned retirements. Meanwhile, the equity partner tier grew by two lawyers, to 128, while the nonequity partnership shrank 2.7%, to 214.
Those head count changes bucked the trend among Pennsylvania-based firms, where a recent study by Citi Private Bank found that total lawyer head count increased by 2.1% on average in 2019, while equity partner head count decreased by 1.2% on average.
Taylor said the equity partner tier growth included five or six people who were promoted internally, including multiple women and multiple diverse lawyers. "That's also codified in our strategic plan to seek and look for those opportunities to elevate to equity partner," he added.
The 2019 head count changes do not include the results of a merger with midsize New York firm Satterlee Stephens, which Duane Morris finalized earlier this month, and worked on for a good portion of 2019. Taylor said that merger, when it was still just a potential combination, had no impact on 2019 financial performance or decision-making regarding staff or attorneys.
In terms of practice activity, Taylor said no group underperformed. He said complex litigators had an especially busy 2019, with significant matters in practices including antitrust, white-collar, medical devices and products liability. Bankruptcy has also seen a major uptick in activity, he said, and the corporate group had an especially busy second half.
Around the globe, the firm added partners internationally in London and Singapore. Taylor said London revenue was up consistent with firmwide revenue in percentage, and that office added four key new partners in the second half of 2019, and 10 lawyers overall, in employment, M&A, debt financing and construction litigation.
"We see London as a growth market," Taylor said.
Looking ahead to the rest of 2020, Taylor said Duane Morris has plans for additional growth in London in the near future, as well as Northern California.
"We're very bullish about our growth strategy," he said. "I'm out there looking for growth, and that's taking a lot of my time."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllDon’t Settle for the Minimum: Finding Constitutional Claims Closer to Home
7 minute readSeven Rules of the Road for Managing Referrals To/From Other Attorneys, Part 1
7 minute readMatt's Corner: RPC 8.4(d)—Conduct Prejudicial to the Administration of Justice
2 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Judicial Ethics Opinion 24-68
- 2Friday Newspaper
- 3Judge Denies Sean Combs Third Bail Bid, Citing Community Safety
- 4Republican FTC Commissioner: 'The Time for Rulemaking by the Biden-Harris FTC Is Over'
- 5NY Appellate Panel Cites Student's Disciplinary History While Sending Negligence Claim Against School District to Trial
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250