Head-On Crash Caused Need for Neck Fusion, Plaintiff Claimed
On May 20, 2014, plaintiff Lorraine Escalante was driving on Route 196, in Coolbaugh Township. She was involved in a head-on collision with another car. She claimed that she also suffered an injury of her neck.
February 27, 2020 at 12:03 PM
3 minute read
Escalante v. State Farm Insurance
$800,000 Verdict
Date of Verdict: Nov. 19, 2019.
Court and Case No.: C.P. Monroe No. 20183746.
Judge: Jennifer H. Sibum.
Type of Action: Motor vehicle.
Injuries: Neck inury.
Plaintiffs Counsel: Kevin P. Foley, Foley Law Firm, Stroudsburg.
Plaintiffs Experts: Dong H. Ko, pain management, Allentown; Allister R. Williams, orthopedic surgery, East Stroudsburg.
Defense Counsel: Jennifer L. LeVan; Forry|Ullman, Bethlehem.
Defense Expert: Robert B. Grob, orthopedic surgery, Lehighton.
Comment:
On May 20, 2014, plaintiff Lorraine Escalante was driving on Route 196, in Coolbaugh Township. She was involved in a head-on collision with another car. She claimed that she also suffered an injury of her neck.
Escalante subsequently settled with the driver's insurer; the insurer agreed to tender its policy limit, which provided $15,000 of coverage.
Escalante sued her insurer, State Farm Insurance Co. She sought to recover her policy, which provided $125,000 of coverage.
State Farm stipulated to liability, and the case was tried on the issues of causation and damages.
Escalante was taken by ambulance to an emergency room. She was ultimately diagnosed with a herniation of her C5-6 intervertebral disc. Following the accident, Escalante came under the care of an orthopedic surgeon and a pain management physician. For the next five years, Escalante treated intermittently with physical therapy, chiropractic care and epidural injections in her neck. At the time of trial, she continued to treat with pain medication.
Escalante's pain management doctor and orthopedic surgeon determined that Escalante suffered a permanent injury and that she requires a fusion and discectomy to repair the herniation.
Escalante sought damages for future medical expenses and past and future pain and suffering. Her husband sought damages for his claim for loss of consortium.
The defense's expert in orthopedic surgery testified that Escalante's MRI showed pre-existing, degenerative pathology, and that her complaints and treatment were solely due to her pre-accident condition. The expert concluded that Escalante does not require a fusion and discectomy.
The jury determined that the plaintiffs' damages totaled $800,000. The defense has moved for a new trial, or in the alternative, to have the verdict molded to the $125,000 policy.
This report is based on information that was provided by plaintiffs counsel. Defense counsel did not respond to calls for comment.
—This report first appeared in VerdictSearch, an ALM publication
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All
Federal Judge Allows Elderly Woman's Consumer Protection Suit to Proceed Against Citizens Bank
5 minute read
Judge Leaves Statute of Limitations Question in Injury Crash Suit for a Jury
4 minute read
Supreme Court's Ruling in 'Students for Fair Admissions' and Its Impact on DEI Initiatives in the Workplace
6 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250
