Why Won't the Supreme Court Let Krasner's Office Withdraw an Exhibit in the Abu-Jamal Dispute?
In their Feb. 24 order granting Maureen Faulkner's request for a probe into whether the Philadelphia District Attorney's Office is conflicted out of handling the appeal of convicted cop killer Mumia Abu-Jamal, the justices denied the office's attempt to withdraw from evidence a page from its website that was altered after Faulkner's petition was filed.
February 28, 2020 at 03:45 PM
6 minute read
In a Feb. 24 order, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court agreed to appoint a special master to probe into whether the Philadelphia District Attorney's Office is conflicted out of handling the appeal of convicted cop killer Mumia Abu-Jamal because of work District Attorney Larry Krasner and others in the office previously did in support of Abu-Jamal.
But while the rare grant of a King's Bench petition filed by Maureen Faulkner, the widow of slain police officer Daniel Faulkner, was significant, the second sentence of the order, denying the District Attorney's Office's attempt to withdraw an exhibit from its response to the petition, quietly highlighted what may prove to be an important aspect of the dispute.
The exhibit in question is a web page under the "About Us" section of the district attorney's website, which currently lists Assistant District Attorney Paul George as assistant supervisor of the Law Division.
Among the office's alleged conflicts of interest Faulkner and her attorneys at Bochetto & Lentz raise in their King's Bench petition is that George, who in private practice represented Abu-Jamal on appeal, now oversees ADA Grady Gervino, the Appeals Unit prosecutor who is currently handling Abu-Jamal's case.
But in its Dec. 2 response to Faulkner's petition, Krasner's office denied that George oversaw the office's appellate lawyers and attached the "About Us" web page as an exhibit in support of its argument.
"As a simple review of the District Attorney's Office's public website or any of the hundreds of appellate briefs the office has filed in this court or the Superior Court since January 2018 shows (and would have shown Mrs. Faulkner's lawyers), Mr. George is not the 'head of the Appellate Unit,' or the 'chief of the Appeals Unit,' of the District Attorney's Office," the office said in the filing, which was submitted by Gervino, Krasner and attorney Lawrence J. Goode, along with Law Division supervisor Nancy Winkelman and First Assistant District Attorney Carolyn Engel Temin. "Rather, Lawrence J. Goode, Esquire, is the head of the Appeals Unit. He has served in that role since the first week of the current district attorney's administration (before that time, Mr. Goode served as the long-term assistant chief of the Philadelphia District Attorney's Office's Appeals Unit).
"It is thus Mr. Goode, and not Mr. George, who is the assigned prosecutor's 'immediate supervisor,'" the response continued.
However, the following day, Krasner's office filed an application to withdraw the web page as an exhibit, saying that after submitting the filing, Gervino "realized that the webpage was updated after petitioner filed her King's Bench petition, although at the time she filed her petition, and prior thereto, it correctly stated, as it does now, that Mr. Goode is the supervisor of the Appeals Unit."
The web page did not, however, list George as assistant supervisor of the Law Division or give any indication of his role in supervising the Appeals Unit at the time Faulkner filed her petition.
"Thus, while the District Attorney's Office's statement that a review of the webpage would have shown petitioner's attorneys that Mr. Goode, and not Mr. George, is the head of the Appeals Unit is accurate, it realizes it erred in including Exhibit C as part of its response, since that version of the page did not exist at the time petitioner filed her King's Bench petition," Gervino wrote.
But in an answer to the District Attorney's Office's application to withdraw the exhibit, Faulkner's attorneys seized on the altered web page as being "emblematic of the district attorney's entire response: it is full of inaccurate and incomplete statements."
Krasner's office's claim that a review of its website would have shown that George is not the immediate supervisor of the ADA handling Abu-Jamal's appeal "is false for at least two reasons," Faulkner's lawyers said.
"First, George's title as 'assistant supervisor' of the Law Division was not listed on the office website until after the King's Bench petition was filed," Faulkner's attorneys wrote. "In fact, prior to the website being updated after petitioner filed her King's Bench petition, the only public indication of George's role at the office was the appearance of his name on filed pleadings. In those pleadings, he appears as a direct supervisor to attorneys underneath him in the hierarchy of the office, including attorneys in the Appeals Unit. Indeed, as recently as July 2019, it is Paul George, not Lawrence J. Goode, who is listed on an appellate brief filed with this court as a superior to Grady Gervino—the same ADA currently assigned to the Mumia Abu-Jamal appeal pending in the Superior Court. Neither George's affidavit nor the district attorney's response explains these facts to the court."
Second, Faulkner's lawyers argued, the fact George is the assistant supervisor of the Law Division means he actually has more authority over Gervino than even Goode does.
"In other words, George does not directly supervise the assistants in the Appeals Unit, he supervises their supervisor," Faulkner's attorneys wrote.
What impact the web page will ultimately play in the Supreme Court's decision on Faulkner's petition remains to be seen, but Faulkner's attorney George Bochetto said the fact that the court refused to allow the exhibit to be withdrawn in significant.
For now, the next step in the process is for the justices to appoint the special master, who will investigate Faulkner's claims and make recommendations to the Supreme Court. In the meantime, per the high court's order granting the King's Bench petition, all matters related to Abu-Jamal's underlying criminal appeal are stayed until further notice.
"This is obviously an historic development and it goes to the very heart of what Larry Krasner is doing as district attorney and whether he is fulfilling his oath of office," Bochetto said. "In the Faulkner case, he is distinctly not fulfilling his oath of office and I think the Supreme Court is going to call him on out on it."
A spokesperson for Krasner's office declined to comment beyond the office's filings.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllHigh Court Revives Kleinbard's Bid to Collect $70K in Legal Fees From Lancaster DA
4 minute readJudges Push for Action to Combat Increasing Threats Against Judiciary
3 minute readDispute Over Failure to Accommodate Disability Ends in $900K Settlement
3 minute readPa. Federal District Courts Reach Full Complement Following Latest Confirmation
Trending Stories
- 1Bar Groups Say IOLA Settlement Protects Civil Litigants' Fund From Future 'Raids'
- 2'Every MAGA Will Buy It:' Elon Musk Featured in Miami Crypto Lawsuit
- 3Pennsylvania Law Schools Are Seeing Double-Digit Boosts in 2025 Applications
- 4Meta’s New Content Guidelines May Result in Increased Defamation Lawsuits Among Users
- 5State Court Rejects Uber's Attempt to Move IP Suit to Latin America
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250