Plaintiff's Injuries Predated Auto Accident, Defense Contended
On July 21, 2017, plaintiff Allyson Moultrie, 32, a teacher, was driving on Lincoln Drive, near its intersection at Johnson Street, in Northwest Philadelphia. When she reached the intersection, she stopped at a red traffic signal. Before she could resume travel, her car's rear end was struck by a trailing car that was being driven by Drew Calvin. Moultrie claimed that she suffered injuries of her neck.
March 05, 2020 at 03:46 PM
3 minute read
Moultrie v. Calvin
Defense verdict
Date of Verdict: Jan. 21.
Court and Case No.: C.P. Philadelphia No. 181203270.
Judge: Charles J. Cunningham III.
Type of Action: Motor vehicle.
Injuries: Neck injury.
Plaintiffs Counsel: Dominic A. Speziali, J. Fine Law Group.
Plaintiffs Expert: Bruce H. Grossinger, neurology, Eddystone.
Defense Counsel: Michael Benjamin Gerstein, Bennett, Bricklin & Saltzburg, Philadelphia.
Defense Expert: Andrew H. Shaer, radiology, Cherry Hill, New Jersey.
Comment:
On July 21, 2017, plaintiff Allyson Moultrie, 32, a teacher, was driving on Lincoln Drive, near its intersection at Johnson Street, in Northwest Philadelphia. When she reached the intersection, she stopped at a red traffic signal. Before she could resume travel, her car's rear end was struck by a trailing car that was being driven by Drew Calvin. Moultrie claimed that she suffered injuries of her neck.
Moultrie sued Calvin. The lawsuit alleged that Calvin was negligent in the operation of his vehicle.
Defense counsel conceded liability. The trial addressed damages.
Moultrie presented to an immediate care facility. She claimed that her back and her shoulders were painful, that she was suffering a headache, and that she had torn a fingernail. She underwent minor treatment.
Moultrie ultimately claimed that she suffered trauma that produced bulges of her C2-3 and C4-5 intervertebral discs and a protrusion of her C5-6 disc. She claimed that she developed residual impingement of a spinal nerve and resultant radiculopathy.
Moultrie immediately commenced a course of chiropractic treatment, which included massages and spinal manipulation. She underwent 29 sessions of treatment, and the treatment lasted until March 27, 2018.
Moultrie also underwent administration of two epidural injections of steroid-based painkillers. Her treatment concluded in May 2019.
Moultrie claimed that her neck remains painful. She claimed that she previously enjoyed jogging, but that the activity aggravates her pain. She also claimed that her pain prevents her tolerance of prolonged periods in which she is seated or standing. Moultrie's treating neurologist opined that Moultrie requires further treatment, including pain medication, estimated at $1,500 per year; physical therapy, estimated at $2,500 per year; and surgery, specifically a cervical fusion and laminectomy, estimated at $60,000.
Moultrie sought recovery of past medical expenses, future medical expenses, and damages for past and future pain and suffering.
Defense counsel contended that Moultrie did not suffer an injury related to the accident. The defense's expert radiologist opined that an MRI scan suggested that Moultrie suffered pre-existing injuries.
The jury rendered a defense verdict. It found that Calvin's negligence was not a factual cause of injury to Moultrie.
This report is based on information that was provided by plaintiffs and defense counsel.
—This report first appeared in VerdictSearch, an ALM publication
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllPa. Federal District Courts Reach Full Complement Following Latest Confirmation
The Defense Bar Is Feeling the Strain: Busy Med Mal Trial Schedules Might Be Phila.'s 'New Normal'
7 minute readFederal Judge Allows Elderly Woman's Consumer Protection Suit to Proceed Against Citizens Bank
5 minute readJudge Leaves Statute of Limitations Question in Injury Crash Suit for a Jury
4 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Tuesday Newspaper
- 2Judicial Ethics Opinion 24-85
- 3Decision of the Day: Administrative Court Finds Prevailing Wage Law Applies to Workers Who Cleaned NYC Subways During Pandemic
- 4Trailblazing Broward Judge Retires; Legacy Includes Bush v. Gore
- 5Federal Judge Named in Lawsuit Over Underage Drinking Party at His California Home
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250