Curb's Edge Not a Dangerous Condition, Defense Argued
On Sept. 9, 2017, plaintiff Ruth Snodgrass, 76, tripped and fell on a curb of a sidewalk at the South Hills Village mall in Bethel Park. Snodgrass claimed knee injuries.
March 12, 2020 at 04:34 PM
3 minute read
Snodgrass v. South Hills Village Associates
Defense Verdict
Date of Verdict: Nov. 15, 2019.
Court and Case No.: C.P. Allegheny No. GD-18-002310.
Judge: Paul F. Lutty Jr.
Type of Action: Premises liability, slip and fall.
Injuries: Knee injury.
Plaintiffs Counsel: Jillian M. Corbett; Simon & Simon.
Plaintiffs Expert: Gregory Flinn Habib, orthopedic surgery, Pittsburgh.
Defense Counsel: Patrick W. Murphy, Patrick W. Murphy, Carnegie.
Defense Expert: William D. Abraham, orthopedic surgery, Pittsburgh.
Comment:
On Sept. 9, 2017, plaintiff Ruth Snodgrass, 76, tripped and fell on a curb of a sidewalk at the South Hills Village mall in Bethel Park. Snodgrass claimed knee injuries.
Snodgrass sued the property owner, South Hills Village Associates. She alleged that the property owner was negligent for allowing a dangerous condition to exist. Snodgrass claimed her toe caught on the edge of a curb while she was stepping up onto the sidewalk; this caused her to trip and fall. Snodgrass' counsel argued that South Hills Village was negligent because the curb's edge was indistinguishable from the street and prevented Snodgrass from anticipating the height differential between the road and the curb. The property owner shoulder have painted the curb's edge a color that would have alerted pedestrians of the difference in elevation, Snodgrass's counsel argued.
The defense maintained that Snodgrass was contributorily negligent, that the height difference was clearly evident and discernible, and that the cub complied with all applicable standards. The defense argued that it was not necessary to paint the curb's edge, since the condition was open and obvious.
Snodgrass was taken by ambulance to an emergency room, complaining of severe pain in her right knee. She was diagnosed with a knee injury and discharged with instructions to follow up with an orthopedic surgeon.
Snodgrass was ultimately diagnosed with a proximal pretibial hematoma and a right knee nondisplaced lateral tibial plateau fracture. On Sept. 20, 2017, 11 days after the accident, Snodgrass presented to an orthopedic surgeon who, via X-ray and MRI, diagnosed her with her injuries. She was fitted with a knee brace and put on a course of physical therapy, which she underwent until November of that year. She received no further treatment thereafter. Snodgrass' expert in orthopedic surgery causally related Snodgrass' injuries and treatment to the accident and opined that she permanently injured her right knee.
Snodgrass testified that she continues to face difficulty with her right knee when walking, specifically when using stairs, and that she can no longer kneel on the knee. She contended that she also has difficulty caring for her husband, who suffered from a massive stroke prior to the accident. Snodgrass's inability to take care of her husband resulted in her having to hire various home health workers. She sought damages for past and future pain and suffering.
The defense's expert in orthopedic surgery, who examined Snodgrass, testified that Snodgrass' fracture healed normally without any lasting effect on her ability to partake in her daily activities.
The jury rendered a defense verdict. It found that South Hills Village was negligent, but its negligence was not a factual cause of harm to Snodgrass.
This report is based on information that was provided by defense counsel. Plaintiffs counsel did not respond to calls for comment.
—This report first appeared in VerdictSearch, an ALM publication
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllPa. Federal District Courts Reach Full Complement Following Latest Confirmation
The Defense Bar Is Feeling the Strain: Busy Med Mal Trial Schedules Might Be Phila.'s 'New Normal'
7 minute readFederal Judge Allows Elderly Woman's Consumer Protection Suit to Proceed Against Citizens Bank
5 minute readJudge Leaves Statute of Limitations Question in Injury Crash Suit for a Jury
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Trailblazing Broward Judge Retires; Legacy Includes Bush v. Gore
- 2Federal Judge Named in Lawsuit Over Underage Drinking Party at His California Home
- 3'Almost an Arms Race': California Law Firms Scooped Up Lateral Talent by the Handful in 2024
- 4Pittsburgh Judge Rules Loan Company's Online Arbitration Agreement Unenforceable
- 5As a New Year Dawns, the Value of Florida’s Revised Mediation Laws Comes Into Greater Focus
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250