FJD Suspends Trials, Closes Most Court Functions Over Coronavirus Concerns
The announcements come a day after court leadership issued a press release pausing sheriff's tax sales and supervised visits to the court nursery in the Family Court building.
March 16, 2020 at 12:13 PM
3 minute read
The First Judicial District has suspended all criminal and civil trials in an effort to help combat the spread of coronavirus.
In an announcement sent early Monday afternoon, court leadership said it was suspending all jury and non-jury trials, as well as preliminary hearings until further notice. All civil pretrial conferences, case management conferences, diversion programs and discovery lists have also been either canceled or postponed.
The announcement also said all FJD courts and related offices are set to be closed starting Tuesday until April 1. As of Sunday, court leadership had also paused sheriff's tax sales and supervised visits to the court nursery in the Family Court building.
Philadelphia District Attorney Larry Krasner also announced new charging and bail-related policies, which said the office would, among other things, seek to hold violent offenders in "held-without-bail" status, but would not seek to hold non-violent offenders pretrial.
"This pandemic requires us all to think differently and bear in mind the paramount danger to the public we cause by ignoring public health," Krasner said, adding later in the release: "I want to be clear: People who do violence and commit truly serious offenses risk being charged and held in custody. You do not want to be in any jail or prison right now, and I suggest that this warning ought to affect people's decision-making and behaviors beyond this public health emergency."
The announcements decision comes as the number of coronavirus cases in Pennsylvania have risen to 76 as of Monday, with most of those clustered in southeastern Pennsylvania. According to a press conference by Philadelphia officials Monday afternoon, there were nine cases pending within in the city.
In its announcement, the FJD said the move was made due to public health concerns, and based on recommendations from local and national health authorities, including the Philadelphia Department of Public Health and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
As state and local officials across the country have have called for and ordered restrictions on businesses and government functions, the Philadelphia court leadership had faced mounting pressure over its announcement March 13 to continue most of its major operations, including jury trials. Other courts in the state, including the Montgomery County Court of Common Pleas and the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, had decided to suspend trials and numerous court services.
The FJD's announcement said the court will continue to handle preliminary arraignments, bail acceptance and emergency protection from abuse service. Juvenile detention and shelter care hearings will also continue.
Following the announcement, Philadelphia Bar Association Chancellor A. Michael Snyder said in a press statement that the bar is "grateful" for the court's decision.
"We are appreciative of the leadership of the Philadelphia's First Judicial District which has just issued an order effectuating a limited closure of the courts. The court's action shows wisdom and consideration of the safety of all who would be called upon to enter the courts of the First Judicial District," he said. "The president judges, Judge [Idee] Fox and Judge [Patrick] Dugan, along with the administrative judges are to be commended for taking decisive action in an ever-emerging health crisis."
For a full list of the changes announced Monday afternoon, read below:
This is a developing story.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllNewly Formed DEI Practices Expect Heightened Demand During Trump Administration
Trending Stories
- 1'We Should Be Pragmatic': Meet the Possible Next FTC Chair
- 2Bank of America's Cash Sweep Program Attracts New Legal Fire in Class Action
- 3Jury That Convicted Ex-Sen. Robert Menendez Accidentally Saw Improper Evidence, Prosecutors Say
- 4Freshfields Hires DOJ Official, Squire Taps Paul Hastings Atty for US Antitrust Head
- 5Goodbye 'Yellow Freight' Road?
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250