Growing Your Skill Set Through Pro Bono Service
This is a story of how persistence and attention to detail can make a legal case turn on a dime—and make a real difference in someone's life.
March 18, 2020 at 12:25 PM
6 minute read
This is a story about a pro bono case in small claims court. But it's a lot more than that. It's a story of a damaged human trying to survive. It's a story of a justice system that too often hits hardest against the most unfortunate people in our society. But it's also a story of how persistence and attention to detail can make a legal case turn on a dime—and make a real difference in someone's life.
This story takes place several years ago, when I was just a young attorney fresh out of law school who decided to try some pro bono work, figuring that I could pick up some trial experience and expand my legal knowledge while doing some good in my city.
I went to the legal assistance organization Philadelphia VIP and was matched with a debt collection case that they said would be a good fit for what I was seeking. Representing a defendant in a small-claims collection suit is a pretty long way from my typical fare; I'm usually found working on behalf of plaintiffs in catastrophic injury and wrongful death cases.
I rode my bike deep into South Philly to meet my client, an unfailingly pleasant woman who'd suffered through a mental breakdown and a divorce, then lost her job. Her only source of income was disability checks, so there was no way she could pay her debt, and now she was panicking over the notice she'd received to appear in municipal court.
Philadelphia VIP connected me with an attorney experienced in debt collection cases, who suggested that I serve notice to the creditor's corporate designee to provide documentation and testimony verifying the validity of the debt. Since these designees are often involved in hundreds of other lawsuits—typically against people who don't have attorneys—there was a chance the document request would create enough of a burden that they wouldn't show up for the hearing. So that's what I did, but it didn't go as I'd hoped; they responded promptly, sending along a document verifying the debt.
When the hearing date arrived, I went looking for the creditor's attorney. The room was filled with debtors who had no lawyers present, and I watched as many of them made deals with the lawyers for their creditors. I found my opponent as he was finishing up with someone else and took him aside to explain that my client had no money and no job, so there was no way they'd ever be able to collect against her. But he said he couldn't drop it, particularly because he'd brought the corporate representative with him, just as I'd requested.
At this point, I knew that it would be virtually impossible to win this case. Everything was in place for them to confirm the debt and get a judgment entered against my client. Nonetheless, I put on my best poker face and told him, "OK, I'm gonna fight it."
So we fought it. It wasn't long before I found myself standing in front of the municipal court judge, making my first and (to this point) only appearance there. It was immediately apparent that the judge favored creditors in these cases; she was shooting down all my attempts to derail their case. But I stood tall, insisting that they still haven't verified the debt's legitimacy—so the judge motioned toward the representative and said, "That's what he's for."
At this point, the representative got sworn in. He stated his name—for the sake of anonymity, we'll call him Gary Jones—and began answering questions from opposing counsel. This was it; with the debt being verified, there wasn't much I could do.
But I said I was going to fight it, and I wasn't about to stop until the final order. So I looked down at the only piece of paper I'd brought with me: the one-page complaint that included a verification of the debt and allegations—signed by "Henry Cook" and dated a month back.
I stood up like I'd been hit by a bolt of lightning, and cut in. "Your honor, this man should at least say his job title and what he does, because he is not Henry Cook, the person who signed the complaint."
The next moment is burned into my memory for all time: "Henry Cook?" Jones blurted out. "He hasn't worked here in years!"
Never before—except on TV—have I seen a case that seemed so certain crumble so quickly. Just like that, the evidence of the debt had become inadmissible, and the judge promptly threw out the case, leaving my client practically jumping for joy when the news came in.
Of course, that left me wondering whether other people had been victimized in the same way, so I scoured the docket for similar cases around the same time and found several other faulty verifications with Henry Cook's name on them as well as other complaints erroneously filed. Next thing I knew, I was an attorney just months out of law school pitching a potential class-action suit to some of Philadelphia's largest law firms (which was quite a confidence booster)—but that's a story for another day.
Although this was just a pro bono case in small claims court, it offers a lesson—and a warning— to those who practice in every area of the law. Take nothing as a given. No case is predetermined. And even a single detail can be the difference between victory and defeat. And no matter how grim a situation may be, as long as you "fight it," you can hold your head high.
Jordan Strokovsky is a trial lawyer and founder of Strokovsky LLC, representing catastrophically injured clients in a diverse range of cases including medical malpractice, birth injury, wrongful death, truck accidents, premises liability, product liability, civil rights, and sexual assault.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllPa. Federal District Courts Reach Full Complement Following Latest Confirmation
The Defense Bar Is Feeling the Strain: Busy Med Mal Trial Schedules Might Be Phila.'s 'New Normal'
7 minute readFederal Judge Allows Elderly Woman's Consumer Protection Suit to Proceed Against Citizens Bank
5 minute readJudge Leaves Statute of Limitations Question in Injury Crash Suit for a Jury
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1New York-Based Skadden Team Joins White & Case Group in Mexico City for Citigroup Demerger
- 2No Two Wildfires Alike: Lawyers Take Different Legal Strategies in California
- 3Poop-Themed Dog Toy OK as Parody, but Still Tarnished Jack Daniel’s Brand, Court Says
- 4Meet the New President of NY's Association of Trial Court Jurists
- 5Lawyers' Phones Are Ringing: What Should Employers Do If ICE Raids Their Business?
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250