Ballard Spahr Held Revenue Flat Last Year as Partnership Contracted
Gross revenue grew just slightly and partner profits were flat, as the firm dealt with some overcapacity.
March 19, 2020 at 01:51 PM
5 minute read
Ballard Spahr chairman Mark Stewart said that even as 2019 was still getting underway, he expected the year to be flat after a significant jump in gross revenue in 2018. He was about right.
The Philadelphia-based Am Law 100 firm reported only modest revenue gains for 2019 amid challenges both expected and unexpected, and as it made adjustments to partner ranks that were complicated by its single-tier model.
Ballard Spahr saw gross revenue increase by 1.5% in 2019, to $420.9 million. Revenue per lawyer was up slightly as well, increasing 1.9% to $702,000.
While the firm saw net income decline, it also decreased head count in its single-tier partnership by close to 4%. In the end, profits per equity partner were roughly flat, at $621,000, as net income decreased by 3.7%, to $156.9 million.
Some of that change in the profit margin was due to planned investments in technology, Stewart said, as part of a greater effort to improve responsiveness to client needs. But a second and bigger reason, he said, was the firm's decision to raise rates less than its peers did. He estimated Ballard Spahr's rate increases were 12% to 20% smaller than those of its competitors.
Those two reasons were planned for, he said. But a couple other factors also played a role. For one, collections were slower in the last part of the year. Meanwhile, the firm noticed—and worked to address—an overcapacity problem, Stewart said.
"We did have more partners, in particular, than we had work," he said. It wasn't in any specific practice or geographic region, but "there were pockets in each department" that were less productive.
He said the issue was not a result of the firm's late 2017 and early 2018 mergers with media law boutique Levine Sullivan Koch & Schulz and Midwest firm Lindquist & Vennum, respectively.
After the growth that resulted from those two combinations in 2018, the firm's total head count barely changed in 2019, decreasing by two lawyers to 600. But the equity tier shed a net 10 partners, making for a total of 253 for 2019.
Most lateral hiring that took place, Stewart said, was "to address a specific need," including additions to the firm's tax group. Though he noted the acquisition of Los Angeles media law boutique Leopold, Petrich & Smith was a move that added to an already strong practice.
The firm also looked for ways to confront partners who were not performing at the right level. Stewart acknowledged that having a single partnership tier makes that a little trickier.
"If we decide here that for one reason or another, someone is not performing as a partner, we only have the option of a nonpartner title. That obviously makes it more difficult," he said.
It also can complicate recruiting, he noted, because lawyers who are nonequity partners at one firm, and don't yet meet the requirements of equity partnership at Ballard, might not want to make a lateral move to a counsel position.
"We have a good track record of bringing in people who were nonequity partners [at their former firms] as counsel, and promoting them to partner later," Stewart said. Still, "That is an admittedly difficult sell."
Despite those two challenges, Stewart said the firm is committed to its partnership model. He said the greatest proponents of the structure as it exists now are women partners who came to Ballard Spahr from other firms with two tiers, where they were in the nonequity group.
Currently, 28% of Ballard Spahr's equity partners are women, and of the nine new partners in 2019, six were women. The firm's board is 40% women. Stewart said he has no exact numbers in mind, but he wants to continue increasing gender equality in the firm's top ranks.
In terms of other goals, at least for 2020, he admitted that the spread of the new coronavirus and resulting economic turmoil has changed his point of view. A month ago he would have been "extremely bullish" on the year, he said. But now "budgets are out the window."
Despite his optimism not so long ago, Stewart said, he had asked department chairs at the end of 2019 to plan what they would do in a recession. Having those plans in hand now will likely pay off, he said.
"If we get through this year and all of our people are safe and they're happy here and they feel that the firm has treated them fairly and taken care of them. … I can't think of anything else" to aim for, he said.
|Read More
Ballard Spahr Sees Big Revenue Gain, Slight Profit Dip After Midwest Merger
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllJudges Push for Action to Combat Increasing Threats Against Judiciary
3 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1'Rethink Everything' or 'Optimize What's Working'? The Right Law Firm Strategy
- 2Working Across the 'Entire Ecosystem' Propels Ropes & Gray's Life Sciences Practice
- 3Government Attorneys Are Flooding the Job Market, But Is There Room in Big Law?
- 4Court of Chancery Vice Chancellor Glasscock Reflects on Rewards of Equity Work, Clerks and the Delaware Way
- 5Breon Peace, U.S. Attorney for the Eastern District of New York, Announces Upcoming Resignation
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250