Plant Machine Crushed Hand, Caused Ongoing Limitations: Plaintiff
On June 22, 2016, plaintiff Tammy Kipp, 49, suffered a crush injury to her right wrist while using a chicken sexing machine at a hatchery plant in Lancaster.
March 19, 2020 at 03:42 PM
4 minute read
Kipp v. Kuhl
$165,000 Settlement
Date of Settlement: Nov. 25, 2019.
Court and Case No.: C.P. Lancaster No. 17-00245.
Type of Action: Products liability.
Injuries: Hand injury.
Plaintiffs Counsel: Bradley R. Smith, Galfand Berger.
Plaintiffs Experts: Jay S. Talsania, orthopedic surgery, Allentown; Paul L. Dreyer, engineering, Pennsauken, New Jersey.
Defense Counsel: Kenneth J. Sykes, William J. Ferren & Associates, Blue Bell.
Defense Experts: David S. Zelouf, hand surgery, Philadelphia; Miles F. Buchman, engineering, Fort Washington.
Comment:
On June 22, 2016, plaintiff Tammy Kipp, 49, suffered a crush injury to her right wrist while using a chicken sexing machine at a hatchery plant in Lancaster.
Kipp sued the machine's manufacturer, Kuhl Corp. She alleged that the machine was designed defectively. The chicken sexing machine was used to sort newly hatched chickens by gender.
Male chicks went to one rung of a set of rotating plastic panels that formed a carousel conveyor, while female chicks went to another such rung. At a certain point in the carousel's rotation, the plastic panels would drop to send the male chicks down another chute, and then the plastic panel would rise again, like a trap door. At the end of Kipp's shift, she was cleaning the machine while the carousel of plastic flaps was still rotating. As she reached to remove debris, the plastic panel dropped and caught her hand in a pinch point formed by the plastic panel when it closed.
Kipp's counsel contended that Kuhl knew workers would have to clean the machine meticulously every day. To clean the machine properly, workers needed to be near this pinch point.
In his report, Kipp's expert in industrial engineering opined that the chicken sexing machine was defective and unsafe because it contained exposed pinch points that workers encountered during normal use of the machine. The pinch point should have been guarded against with a fixed guard that prevented a worker from reaching into the dangerous area. According to the expert, workers also should have been warned about the hazard by receiving instructions to shut down the machine when they entered the center of it, from which the pinch point was accessible. While other pinch points on the machine were guarded, and workers were warned about them, the pinch point where Kipp was trapped had no guard and no warning, the expert concluded.
The defense maintained that the chicken sexing machine was not defective. In his report, the defense's expert in industrial engineering opined that the pinch-point hazard was guarded by location and that to access the hazardous area, Kipp had to defy instructions from her employer and crawl beneath the conveyors. The expert stated that Kipp violated the lock-out/tag-out instructions that were included in the machine's manual and enforced by her employer. The machine was initially supplied with two chutes that would have served as guards and prevented access to the pinch point, but those chutes were removed by Kipp's employer, the expert noted.
Kipp's co-worker drove her to an emergency room. Kipp was diagnosed with a crush injury to her right wrist, of her dominant arm. She was discharged and then came under the care of a hand surgeon. On July 15, 2016, almost a month later, Kipp underwent a carpal tunnel release of her right wrist. Following the procedure, she underwent physical therapy through December 2016. She received no further treatment.
In his report, Kipp's expert in orthopedic surgery opined that Kipp reached maximum medical improvement but would continue to suffer from restrictions, including ongoing neuropathy and weakness.
Kipp alleged that in her right wrist she continues to experience a lack of grip strength and dexterity, along with weakness and numbness. This allegedly makes it difficult for her to carry heavy objects. Kipp sought to recover a workers' compensation lien of $37,974, plus damages for past and future pain and suffering.
The defense maintained that Kipp made a full recovery from her injury. There were no objective findings that would justify her ongoing symptoms, the defense's expert in hand surgery noted in his report.
The parties negotiated a pretrial settlement. Kuhl's insurer agreed to pay $165,000.
This report is based on information that was provided by plaintiffs counsel. Defense counsel did not respond to the reporter's phone calls.
—This report first appeared in VerdictSearch, an ALM publication
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFederal Judge Allows Elderly Woman's Consumer Protection Suit to Proceed Against Citizens Bank
5 minute readJudge Leaves Statute of Limitations Question in Injury Crash Suit for a Jury
4 minute readSupreme Court's Ruling in 'Students for Fair Admissions' and Its Impact on DEI Initiatives in the Workplace
6 minute readMembership Has Its Privileges: Bankruptcy Court Examines LLC's Authority to File Bankruptcy
8 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1State Attorney General Faces Federal Courtroom Test Over Crypto Mining Ban
- 2The Corporate Transparency Act: One Year Later With Deadline Looming
- 3Getting Cameras in Federal Courts Will Take More than Logic
- 4Emerson Electric Opens Wallet to Reward New CLO for Fast Start
- 5Kirkland Hires Real Estate Finance Partners in New York
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250