Plant Machine Crushed Hand, Caused Ongoing Limitations: Plaintiff
On June 22, 2016, plaintiff Tammy Kipp, 49, suffered a crush injury to her right wrist while using a chicken sexing machine at a hatchery plant in Lancaster.
March 19, 2020 at 03:42 PM
4 minute read
Kipp v. Kuhl
$165,000 Settlement
Date of Settlement: Nov. 25, 2019.
Court and Case No.: C.P. Lancaster No. 17-00245.
Type of Action: Products liability.
Injuries: Hand injury.
Plaintiffs Counsel: Bradley R. Smith, Galfand Berger.
Plaintiffs Experts: Jay S. Talsania, orthopedic surgery, Allentown; Paul L. Dreyer, engineering, Pennsauken, New Jersey.
Defense Counsel: Kenneth J. Sykes, William J. Ferren & Associates, Blue Bell.
Defense Experts: David S. Zelouf, hand surgery, Philadelphia; Miles F. Buchman, engineering, Fort Washington.
Comment:
On June 22, 2016, plaintiff Tammy Kipp, 49, suffered a crush injury to her right wrist while using a chicken sexing machine at a hatchery plant in Lancaster.
Kipp sued the machine's manufacturer, Kuhl Corp. She alleged that the machine was designed defectively. The chicken sexing machine was used to sort newly hatched chickens by gender.
Male chicks went to one rung of a set of rotating plastic panels that formed a carousel conveyor, while female chicks went to another such rung. At a certain point in the carousel's rotation, the plastic panels would drop to send the male chicks down another chute, and then the plastic panel would rise again, like a trap door. At the end of Kipp's shift, she was cleaning the machine while the carousel of plastic flaps was still rotating. As she reached to remove debris, the plastic panel dropped and caught her hand in a pinch point formed by the plastic panel when it closed.
Kipp's counsel contended that Kuhl knew workers would have to clean the machine meticulously every day. To clean the machine properly, workers needed to be near this pinch point.
In his report, Kipp's expert in industrial engineering opined that the chicken sexing machine was defective and unsafe because it contained exposed pinch points that workers encountered during normal use of the machine. The pinch point should have been guarded against with a fixed guard that prevented a worker from reaching into the dangerous area. According to the expert, workers also should have been warned about the hazard by receiving instructions to shut down the machine when they entered the center of it, from which the pinch point was accessible. While other pinch points on the machine were guarded, and workers were warned about them, the pinch point where Kipp was trapped had no guard and no warning, the expert concluded.
The defense maintained that the chicken sexing machine was not defective. In his report, the defense's expert in industrial engineering opined that the pinch-point hazard was guarded by location and that to access the hazardous area, Kipp had to defy instructions from her employer and crawl beneath the conveyors. The expert stated that Kipp violated the lock-out/tag-out instructions that were included in the machine's manual and enforced by her employer. The machine was initially supplied with two chutes that would have served as guards and prevented access to the pinch point, but those chutes were removed by Kipp's employer, the expert noted.
Kipp's co-worker drove her to an emergency room. Kipp was diagnosed with a crush injury to her right wrist, of her dominant arm. She was discharged and then came under the care of a hand surgeon. On July 15, 2016, almost a month later, Kipp underwent a carpal tunnel release of her right wrist. Following the procedure, she underwent physical therapy through December 2016. She received no further treatment.
In his report, Kipp's expert in orthopedic surgery opined that Kipp reached maximum medical improvement but would continue to suffer from restrictions, including ongoing neuropathy and weakness.
Kipp alleged that in her right wrist she continues to experience a lack of grip strength and dexterity, along with weakness and numbness. This allegedly makes it difficult for her to carry heavy objects. Kipp sought to recover a workers' compensation lien of $37,974, plus damages for past and future pain and suffering.
The defense maintained that Kipp made a full recovery from her injury. There were no objective findings that would justify her ongoing symptoms, the defense's expert in hand surgery noted in his report.
The parties negotiated a pretrial settlement. Kuhl's insurer agreed to pay $165,000.
This report is based on information that was provided by plaintiffs counsel. Defense counsel did not respond to the reporter's phone calls.
—This report first appeared in VerdictSearch, an ALM publication
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllPa. Federal District Courts Reach Full Complement Following Latest Confirmation
The Defense Bar Is Feeling the Strain: Busy Med Mal Trial Schedules Might Be Phila.'s 'New Normal'
7 minute readFederal Judge Allows Elderly Woman's Consumer Protection Suit to Proceed Against Citizens Bank
5 minute readJudge Leaves Statute of Limitations Question in Injury Crash Suit for a Jury
4 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1DC Bar’s Proposed Anti-Discrimination, Harassment Conduct Rule Sees More Pushback
- 2California's Chief Justice Starts Third Year With Questions About Fires, Trump and AI
- 3Justin Baldoni Sues Blake Lively and Ryan Reynolds for $400M in New Step in 'It Ends With Us' Fight
- 4Top Leadership Changes Coming for NJ Attorney General's Office
- 5SCOTUSBlog Co-Founder Tom Goldstein Misused Law Firm Funds, According to Federal Indictment
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250