Suit's Parties Disputed Liability Over Crash at Intersection
On Aug. 17, 2016, plaintiff Angela Bobo, a home health aide in her mid-60s, was driving east on Providence Road at its intersection with Wycombe Avenue in Yeadon. The front of a sport utility vehicle struck the passenger's side of her car. The sport utility vehicle was driving south on Wycombe Avenue. Bobo claimed neck and back injuries.
March 19, 2020 at 03:45 PM
4 minute read
Bobo v. Gould
$151,300 Verdict
Date of Verdict: Oct. 10, 2019.
Court and Case No.: C,P, Philadelphia No. 180800631.
Judge: Charles J. Cunningham III.
Type of Action: Motor vehicle.
Injuries: Back injury.
Plaintiffs Counsel: Craig A. Falcone, Sacchetta & Falcone.
Plaintiffs Experts: Dennis W. Ivill, physical medicine, Darby,.
Defense Counsel: Alexandra C. Venters, Palmer & Barr, Willow Grove.
Defense Experts: Armando A. Mendez, orthopedic surgery, Ridley Park.
Comment:
On Aug. 17, 2016, plaintiff Angela Bobo, a home health aide in her mid-60s, was driving east on Providence Road at its intersection with Wycombe Avenue in Yeadon. The front of a sport utility vehicle struck the passenger's side of her car. The sport utility vehicle was driving south on Wycombe Avenue. Bobo claimed neck and back injuries.
Bobo sued the driver, Lela Gould. Bobo alleged that Gould was negligent in the operation of her vehicle. The intersection was controlled by a three-way stop sign. Bobo's counsel argued that Gould caused the collision by driving through her stop sign and into the side of Bobo's car.
The defense maintained that Bobo was contributorily negligent. Gould testified that after she came to a stop at her stop sign, she looked left and saw Bobo approximately five to eight car-lengths away from her stop sign, still approaching it. Gould, believing it was safe to enter the intersection, proceeded forward, at which time she struck Bobo's vehicle. Based on the timing, it was evident that Bobo drove through the stop sign and caused the collision, Gould's counsel contended.
Bobo was taken by ambulance to an emergency room and was examined and released. Bobo was ultimately diagnosed with chronic pain syndrome; herniations at cervical, thoracic and lumbar intervertebral discs C2-3, C3-4, C4-5, C5-6, C6-7, T12-L1, L1-2, L2-3, L3-4, L4-5 and L5-S1; cervical and lumbar radiculopathies; and strains and sprains of her cervical, thoracic and lumbar strain.
A week post-accident, in late August 2016, Bobo presented to a chiropractor. She complained of neck and back pain. Through February 2017 she treated with 46 sessions of chiropractic treatment; her treatment consisted of massage and spinal manipulation. From February 2017 to April 31, 2017, Bobo treated with a physiatrist. The doctor prescribed pain medication. Bobo received no further treatment.
Bobo's physiatrist causally related her injuries and treatment to the accident. The physician opined that Bobo suffered a serious impairment of a bodily function in her neck and back. Bobo testified that her ongoing neck and back pain caused her to become permanently disabled. She is unable to function as she did before, and she requires assistance from family members to help care for her mother, Bobo stated. She sought to recover a stipulated amount of $1,300 in medical costs; future lost earnings, as Bobo earned $25,000 annually as a home health aide; and damages for past and future pain and suffering.
The defense maintained that Bobo's alleged injuries and treatment were the result of her contributory negligence. The defense questioned the legitimacy of Bobo's injuries, since she was treating with pain medication for lumbar complaints at the time of the accident.
The defense's expert in orthopedic surgery, who examined Bobo, concluded that she suffered a cervical and thoracic strain and sprain from the accident, from which she made a full recovery. The expert testified that Bobo's MRIs showed significant pre-existing degeneration in her lumbar spine and hips which predated the accident, and that such degeneration was unaffected by the accident.
The jury found Bobo and Gould each 50 percent liable. Bobo was determined to receive $151,300, which was accordingly reduced to $75,650.
This report is based on information that was provided by defense counsel. Plaintiffs counsel did not respond to the reporter's phone calls.
—This report first appeared in VerdictSearch, an ALM publication
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllPa. Federal District Courts Reach Full Complement Following Latest Confirmation
The Defense Bar Is Feeling the Strain: Busy Med Mal Trial Schedules Might Be Phila.'s 'New Normal'
7 minute readFederal Judge Allows Elderly Woman's Consumer Protection Suit to Proceed Against Citizens Bank
5 minute readJudge Leaves Statute of Limitations Question in Injury Crash Suit for a Jury
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Tuesday Newspaper
- 2Judicial Ethics Opinion 24-85
- 3Decision of the Day: Administrative Court Finds Prevailing Wage Law Applies to Workers Who Cleaned NYC Subways During Pandemic
- 4Trailblazing Broward Judge Retires; Legacy Includes Bush v. Gore
- 5Federal Judge Named in Lawsuit Over Underage Drinking Party at His California Home
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250