Family of Man Shot 25 Times Can Proceed With Lawsuit Against Philadelphia Police Officers
The family of a West Philadelphia man with a history of mental illness who was fatally shot by police responding to a call that he assaulted his children has been cleared to move forward with part of their lawsuit against the city and Philadelphia Police Department officers.
March 20, 2020 at 04:24 PM
3 minute read
The family of a West Philadelphia man with a history of mental illness who was fatally shot by police responding to a call that he assaulted his children has been cleared to move forward with part of their lawsuit against the city and Philadelphia Police Department officers.
U.S. District Judge Cynthia Rufe of the Eastern District of Pennsylvania granted in part and denied in part a motion for summary judgment filed by nine police officers sued by Christopher Sowell's mother Aleathia Duvall, and the mother of his children, Hyshonda Hinton.
The plaintiffs sued for wrongful death, excessive force, assault and battery, and intentional infliction of emotional distress. They also alleged the city failed to adequately supervise its officers.
Rufe dismissed the assault, battery and intentional infliction of emotional distress claims but allowed the others to move forward.
"Nothing in this opinion should be taken as suggesting that the court has deemed some evidence more reliable or some witnesses more credible than others; those determinations will be for a jury to make," Rufe said. "Because critical facts are genuinely disputed, however, and because the court is required at this stage to view the facts in the light most favorable to plaintiffs, summary judgment cannot be granted as to plaintiffs' excessive-force claim or their Monell claim for failure to supervise or discipline."
Sowell was shot in September 2016 after experiencing a "mental health- or drug-related episode," Rufe said.
According to Rufe, police officers said Sowell mentioned he had seen "demons"
"Sowell, a 32-year-old man with a history of mental health issues, was sought by police after he attacked his two minor children and a minor relative," Rufe said.
She added that the officers testified that when they responded to the call they found Sowell's children "covered in blood."
Eventually, "the officers found him on the front steps of a friend's nearby home. Sowell's behavior there, the officers have testified, led them to believe that he posed an imminent threat to their safety. The officers opened fire. Collectively, they fired 109 rounds at Sowell. Twenty-five bullets struck Sowell, killing him," Rufe said.
The plaintiffs are represented by Eric Spade of the Spade Law Firm in Philadelphia. Reached Friday, Spade declined to comment.
Aaron Shotland of the City of Philadelphia's Law Department represents the defendants and did not respond to a request for comment Friday.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllHigh Court Revives Kleinbard's Bid to Collect $70K in Legal Fees From Lancaster DA
4 minute readJudges Push for Action to Combat Increasing Threats Against Judiciary
3 minute readDispute Over Failure to Accommodate Disability Ends in $900K Settlement
3 minute readPa. Federal District Courts Reach Full Complement Following Latest Confirmation
Trending Stories
- 1Legal Tech's Predictions for Knowledge Management in 2025
- 2Fenwick Shutters Shanghai Office
- 3Litigators of the (Past) Week: Defending Against a $290M Claim and Scoring a $116M Win in Drug Patent Fight
- 4Litigator of the Week Runners-Up and Shout-Outs
- 5Am Law 50's Head Count 'Holding Pattern' Could Trickle Down
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250