Legal Malpractice and COVID-19: The Devil Is in the Details and Follow the Money
The crisis will not last forever and when it subsides, we will return to our offices and to our normal work routines. COVID-19, however, will leave its mark.
March 27, 2020 at 12:32 PM
5 minute read
COVID-19 is an unprecedented challenge for us all. Our normal routines have been set aside by choice and by fiat. We are working from home with all of the distractions that brings—children, pets, partners (the other kind)—are all part of the new normal. The access to the refrigerator, the TV and the X-Box, are all part of the new normal. At least for now. The crisis will not last forever and when it subsides, we will return to our offices and to our normal work routines. COVID-19, however, will leave its mark.
Many better qualified experts than I are already speculating on a COVID-19 baby boom (as well as a "divorce tsunami"). I anticipate a COVID-19 legal malpractice upswell (nothing as dramatic as a tsunami), and it does not take much of an imagination to see why. The COVID-19 upswell will be driven by two idioms that are newer than you might think and exceptionally relevant to the current moment.
The Devil Is in the Details
The origin of the idiom "the devil is in the details" is cloaked in some significant degree of mystery. German architect Ludwig Mies van der Rohe (1886-1969), the last director of the Bauhaus, is closely associated with the phrase, as well as the phrase "God is in the details," although it almost certainly did not originate with him. A version of the phrase may have been first used by French novelist Gustave Flaubert. Whatever its origins, the phrase should appropriately be considered a touchstone for legal malpractice avoidance. It is the details, and the devils that dwell therein, that consistently entrap legal professionals.
COVID-19 or not, the duty of a lawyer to her client does not alter. The lawyer must exercise "ordinary skill and knowledge." However, the upheaval brought about by COVID-19 has made it much harder to exercise "ordinary" skill and knowledge. Our judicial system is a patchwork in the best of times. These are not the best of times. Some courts are completely closed, others are not; some courts have extended all deadlines, some courts have extended some deadlines, some courts have extended no deadlines.
Missed deadlines are perennially the leading cause of legal malpractice cases. It is more important than ever, and more complex than ever, to track the deadlines your clients' cases are subject to. This is where the devil is in the details. Deadlines are approaching (if you can figure out what they are) and scheduling a deposition has never been more difficult. Witnesses have retreated into hiding and experts are unavailable. Fellow attorneys are working from home with varying degrees of responsiveness.
The difficulty in interpreting the patchwork of court orders is compounded by the fact that your support staff is providing their support from their homes. It is difficult to coordinate activities, what could be accomplished two weeks ago by sticking your head out the door now requires an email. Although difficult, it is more important than ever to keep in touch with your staff and make sure you know who is taking on the responsibility of making certain that all revised deadlines are calendared and attended to. At the end of the day, you—the attorney—are responsible for making certain that what needs to be done gets done.
Follow the Money
The other reason to anticipate a legal malpractice upswell is found in the idiom "follow the money," or James Carville's memorable "the economy, stupid." Unlike "the devil is in the details," the origin of "follow the money" as a popular idiom is clear. The brilliant William Goldman ("The Princess Bride," "Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid," "Marathon Man") created the line for "Deep Throat" in the screenplay for "All the President's Men." The line does not appear in Bob Woodward and Carl Bernstein's book or articles.
Legal malpractice frequency trends along economic lines. The "Great Recession" from 2007-2009 saw a marked increase in legal malpractice actions. When people lose jobs, homes or businesses, litigation ensues, including legal malpractice actions. One of the interesting results of the burst of the housing bubble, which was the impetus for the Great Recession, was that legal malpractice claims involving underlying real estate issues overtook legal malpractice claims with underlying personal injury actions in claim frequency.
The stock market has fallen precipitously in the last month with the Dow Jones Industrial Average losing over 10,000 points. Many businesses have seen a sharp decline in revenue or have been put completely out of business. It is inevitable that litigation will arise out of this economic ruin. People will blame their attorneys for financial failure—warranted or not.
During these times the small things we should always be doing to guard against legal malpractice become more important than ever. Some of the most basic things to concentrate on are:
- Check and recheck deadlines and adhere to them;
- Stay in communication with your office staff and attorneys;
- Stay in communication with your clients;
- Document your communication with your clients in writing;
- Manage expectations in writing;
- Do not put anything into an email that you do not want blown up as an exhibit at trial;
- Utilize the resources your professional liability carrier and bar associations have to provide guidance.
There is no foolproof way to guard against legal malpractice actions, but being aware that this is a time of particular risk and following best practices protocols will give you the best protection possible. Remember, the devil is in the details.
Josh J.T. Byrne, a partner in Swartz Campbell's professional liability group in the firm's Philadelphia office, is the chair of the Pennsylvania Bar Association's professional liability committee former co-chair of the Philadelphia Bar Association's professional guidance committee.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllPa. Federal District Courts Reach Full Complement Following Latest Confirmation
The Defense Bar Is Feeling the Strain: Busy Med Mal Trial Schedules Might Be Phila.'s 'New Normal'
7 minute readFederal Judge Allows Elderly Woman's Consumer Protection Suit to Proceed Against Citizens Bank
5 minute readJudge Leaves Statute of Limitations Question in Injury Crash Suit for a Jury
4 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250