Families First Coronavirus Response Act: The Likely Impact to Educational Institutions
As the coronavirus (COVID-19) spreads throughout the United States, the impact on student instruction, including big budget unknowns for public and private educational institutions, is daunting.
March 31, 2020 at 12:06 PM
4 minute read
As the coronavirus (COVID-19) spreads throughout the United States, the impact on student instruction, including big budget unknowns for public and private educational institutions, is daunting. Adding to this concern is the Families First Coronavirus Response Act (H.R. 6201) (the act) that was passed by the Senate and signed by the president on Wednesday, March 18, expands the protections under the Family Medical Leave Act (FMLA) and requires many private and all public educational institutions to provide significant amounts of paid leave related to COVID-19.
|Emergency Family and Medical Leave Expansion Act
The Emergency Family and Medical Leave Expansion Act expands FMLA coverage for employees unable to work (or telework) due to the need to care for an employee's child who is under 18, because the child's school or daycare is closed or the childcare provider is unavailable due to COVID-19 related restrictions and closures. For private educational institutions, the EFMLEA exempts private institutions with over 500 employees and may exempt smaller institutions of fewer than 50 employees where it would "jeopardize the viability of the business as a going concern." Public educational institutions should be prepared to follow the requirements of the EFMLEA regardless of size. Employees need only be employed for 30 calendar days to be considered covered by the act.
The leave also provides the employee with continued health benefits and full restoration rights at the conclusion of the leave.
|Emergency Paid Sick Leave Act
The Emergency Paid Sick Leave Act creates a new paid sick leave entitlement for workers affected by COVID-19 wherein the employee is subject to a legal quarantine or isolation order; the employee has been advised by a health care provider to self-quarantine; the employee is symptomatic and seeking a diagnosis; the employee is caring for a person described in reason 1 or 2; the employee is caring for a son or daughter whose school or day care is closed, or the child-care provider is unavailable due to COVID-19 precautions; or the employee is experiencing any other substantially similar condition specified by the Secretary of Health and Human Services (HHS). Private educational institutions with less than 500 employees and all public-sector educational institutions are covered. There is no minimum length of employment for eligibility.
Eligible full-time employees may be eligible for up to 80 hours of paid leave for a qualified reason. Part-time employees may take the number of hours that they work over a two-week period. The paid leave is available for immediate use.
Under both provisions of the act, retaliation is prohibited based on an employee's request for leave or participation in a complaint about a violation of the act.
|Rate of Leave Pay
The EFMLEA requires covered employers to pay 2/3 of the employee's regular rate of pay, subject to caps, for up to 10 weeks, as the first 10 days may be unpaid. The paid sick leave requires pay of at least 2/3 of the regular rate up to the regular rate of pay, depending on the triggering event.
Under the act, private educational institutions will receive immediate tax relief through payroll deductions. Public educational institutions will likely not benefit from the tax relief because they are typically funded through state aid or other revenue and treated differently.
|Next Steps for Educational Institutions
The act creates significant new financial and administrative obligations for educational employers during these difficult times. While the FMLA is not applicable to public educational institutions during periods of shutdowns, these institutions should be prepared to address these issues when their doors reopen. Public and covered private institutions should work with counsel to prepare policies and strategize regarding implementation of both new leave provisions. The law in this area is changing rapidly and tax credits, revenue sources, and even new leave provisions should be anticipated. The act will remain in effect through Dec. 31, unless extended by the Secretary of Labor.
Stay healthy. We will get through this together.
Maria Fracassa Dwyer is the member-in-charge of Clark Hill's Detroit office. She focuses her practice on employment defense litigation and counseling. Dwyer is a trusted adviser to senior management across a wide range of industries including public and private employers.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'What Is Certain Is Uncertainty': Patchwork Title IX Rules Face Expected Changes in Second Trump Administration
5 minute readPenn State Agrees to $1.25M Settlement in Novel 'Cyber-Whistleblower' Suit
4 minute readDechert Partners With Wharton School for Associate-Level Business Training Program
Phila., Del. Firms Handling UArts' Ch. 7 Petition Fall Far Below Top Bankruptcy Rates
3 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Gordon Rees Opens 80th Office, ‘Collaboration Hub’ in Palo Alto
- 2The White Stripes Drop Copyright Claim Against Trump Campaign
- 3Law Firm Accused of Barratry for Allegedly Soliciting Crash Victims
- 4Carlton Fields Downsizes in Move to New Atlanta Office
- 5Trump's Selection of Zeldin to Head EPA Draws Surprise, Little Hope of Avoiding Deregulation
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250