The Virus Is Changing How Lawyers Work. So What Can Law Firms Learn From It?
The new coronavirus is changing law firms now, and may leave them with some lessons for the future.
April 06, 2020 at 01:57 PM
7 minute read
In just a few weeks, a legal industry that seemed cautiously optimistic about the year ahead changed its tone drastically, as law firm leaders quickly shifted focus to the new coronavirus—first complying with measures meant to limit its spread and then preparing for any number of potential economic outcomes.
While those evaluations and decisions haven't been easy, industry watchers say they may lead to some constructive long-term changes.
Matthew Haverstick, a managing partner at Philadelphia-based Kleinbard, said recent events have been "vindicating" for his firm's leadership, reinforcing their decision to "be disciplined in good times." And transitioning to remote work has helped the firm identify some strategies for the future.
In the past six months, for example, the firm was struggling to determine whether it needed additional office space.
"We've now quickly discovered we don't need more real estate, we don't need more space," Haverstick said. "Some lawyers probably prefer to work at home, and I think we can accommodate that."
Kleinbard, and most other U.S. law firms, are going through a forced experiment with remote work that is making them rethink how they typically do business. That may seem to have only negative outcomes—including furloughs and layoffs of employees whose work is only relevant in the traditional brick-and-mortar office. But it may also simply accelerate some changes that the industry was already calling for.
"I do think firms and attorneys are getting more comfortable with the working from home aspect of it," recruiter Jason Mandel, of Alevistar Legal Group, said in an email. "I view it in two ways—yes, you can certainly work from home very effectively in these times, but will the desire to interact with people on a day-to-day basis top that?"
Grant Walsh, the Dallas-based founder and managing partner of Culhane Meadows, where all the lawyers and staff work remotely, said the current situation has pushed the most traditional law firms to try a model they have long eschewed. And they may be surprised by the results.
"You're going to see an entirely new acceptance of this approach. It's going to legitimize what we've been saying for seven years" since Culhane Meadows was founded, Walsh said. "Lawyers who previously thought they couldn't function from a home office will suddenly feel different about it."
Even those firms that place a heavy emphasis on face time will learn that they can get a lot of those meaningful interactions in a virtual setting. Walsh said his firm has long depended on occasional in-person meetings and socials, but also on more regular virtual meetings and gatherings via video conferencing. For instance, this week the tax practice hosted a watch-and-learn program, in which participants streamed the movie "The Laundromat" on Netflix, and tax lawyers answered questions about the legal issues that arise in the movie.
Walsh said he also hopes more traditional law firms will notice that offering remote work flexibility may come with some gains for gender equity. Some firms limit the partnership opportunities for lawyers who want to work a flexible schedule or partially remote, he noted. But now that they're forced to work remotely, those firms may realize that offering flexibility to those lawyers—often parents, and more often mothers—does not have to come with a career trade-off.
He's hopeful they will now see, "She was just as productive remotely when she was homeschooling her kids … so maybe we weren't quite fair to think she couldn't make partner at our firm."
That potential for lessons learned also extends to staffing.
"It's forcing firms to rethink the way they use staff," Steve Kruza, of Kruza Legal Search, said, "with an eye on efficiency."
Maura McAnney of McAnney, Esposito & Kraybill Associates agreed. "With so many people working at home, what will happen with support staff, people who got used to using support staff?"
Paralegals will likely continue to be in demand, however, because firms can bill for their work, she said. For other staff, she said, how they are utilized at their firms will likely change for the long term.
Haverstick said his firm, which has around 30 lawyers, was already staffed leanly, so it hasn't seen any redundancies yet.
Even if some firms identify opportunities to be more lean, Kruza said, those that are instituting partner pay cuts instead of layoffs are doing the right thing for the moment. Particularly at highly profitable firms, it's better for a partner making seven or eight figures a year to take a temporary cut than for an employee making much less to lose their income and benefits.
"It's good for your business, it's good for the culture of your company … and you don't want to lose good people," he said. "This is a horrific issue, but it is temporary, and this will be a memory at some point."
'Wait and See?' Or Seize the Day
But there's one change recruiters hope will be temporary: law firms have largely paused hiring.
Kruza said large firms especially are freezing hiring, unless a move was already far along. But he doesn't expect that to last forever.
"It's not that those deals are dead … it's just wait and see," he said.
Mandel said the same, though candidates who were scheduled to start in the last three weeks have been successfully onboarded. His group has made a few placements as well in that time, but not as many as normal.
"Other than that it's really a standstill. To the extent that there are strong bankruptcy candidates out there I think there's an interest in speaking to them," he said.
But it's not just bankruptcy practices. Haverstick said his firm is open to opportunities for hiring young lawyers, especially if the Big Law firms that would have normally hired them are now pausing their recruitment efforts. Because the firm is "measured" in making partner distributions, and keeps a healthy amount of cash on hand, it's able to seize on those opportunities, he said.
Culhane Meadows, too, is looking at opportunities to hire now. It recently added intellectual property partner Christopher Rothe in Philadelphia, bringing him over from RatnerPrestia.
And among other law firms too, Mandel said, there seems to still be hope that lesser activity as a result of the coronavirus is a short-term issue.
"It really feels like everyone is just holding their breath. It feels like we're all holding our breath and hoping we make it through this without too many adversities," McAnney said.
In any case, McAnney noted, there's a big difference between the current state of things and the Great Recession, which creates hope for a bounce-back: "This was not a crisis caused by the economy … it was caused by a virus."
Read More
Your Clients Need Attention. But So Do the Kids
As Remote Work Brings Isolation, How Can Firms Keep Lawyers in the Fold?
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllWhether to Choose State or Federal Court in a Case Involving a Franchise?
5 minute readKirkland Lands in Phila., but Rate Pressure May Limit the High-Flying Firm's Growth Prospects
5 minute readThe Intersection of Labor Law and Politics Following the Presidential Election
8 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 15th Circuit Considers Challenge to Louisiana's Ten Commandments Law
- 2Crocs Accused of Padding Revenue With Channel-Stuffing HEYDUDE Shoes
- 3E-discovery Practitioners Are Racing to Adapt to Social Media’s Evolving Landscape
- 4The Law Firm Disrupted: For Office Policies, Big Law Has Its Ear to the Market, Not to Trump
- 5FTC Finalizes Child Online Privacy Rule Updates, But Ferguson Eyes Further Changes
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250