Minimize Coronavirus' Impact on Your Firm by Embracing the Cloud
Law firms that adopt a complete cloud strategy for the major functions of their business: communication and collaboration, document and client management, human resources, marketing, litigation management, document review, billing, and accounting, are able to create a more viable business continuity plan.
April 07, 2020 at 12:43 PM
3 minute read
The coronavirus outbreak is affecting law firms in profound ways and represents an inflection point for how law firms survive unplanned disruptions. Across the United States, school systems are announcing closures and businesses are asking employees to work from home. The economic effects of these disruptions, especially on small and midsize firms, can be significant.
Similarly, natural disasters, like the tornadoes that tore through Tennessee last month, displace people from their homes and workplaces. Workers are forced to find alternate locations with electricity and a Wi-Fi connection; or businesses scramble to restore on-premise technology by moving computing infrastructure to higher ground, figuratively speaking, in a short period of time. Natural disasters can cost law firms, not necessarily from physical damage, but from a cessation of business functions for several days.
Law firms that adopt a complete cloud strategy for the major functions of their business: communication and collaboration, document and client management, human resources, marketing, litigation management, document review, billing, and accounting, are able to create a more viable business continuity plan.
With a carefully planned, integrated strategy to host critical business systems in the cloud, firms become much less susceptible to disruptions from events like natural disasters or pandemics. Because data and systems that are vital for the firms' operations can be accessed securely anywhere there is an internet connection, firms are not faced with severe business disruption and loss of revenue when employees cannot physically come into the office. In fact, cloud-enabled firms can be more proactive than other businesses in minimizing risk to their employees by acting quickly to issue stay-at-home directives to their employees.
To plan for complete cloud adoption and migration, start by choosing a trusted vendor. Cloud vendors must be vetted to ensure conformity with the stringent ABA cybersecurity and privacy standards, and others like HIPPA depending on specific practice areas, that a law firm must uphold. Offerings must meet the specific needs of the firm in regard to cost, data capacity demands and scalability. Additionally, the various cloud technologies that a firm uses must fit together in a holistic solution that works for all departments and employees. Before purchasing and implementing cloud services, consider how your firm will use each service to meet business goals. Proper integration plans should be built like a roadmap and include comprehensive user testing and roll-out programs to ensure end user adoption.
Then, prepare staff. plan for team training sessions and adapt current business policies and procedures to the cloud technology. Don't just make training available; make it a requirement for all firm staff. Only through proper training will your firm fully benefit from the cloud.
Finally, migrate securely. Migrate over a secure internet connection to mitigate potential risks. Allow for brief downtime during the migration.
Events like pandemics and natural disasters remind us that building a technology infrastructure in the cloud is like building on a proverbial rock. When the unavoidable occurs, save your business from avoidable disruptions, costs and logistical burdens by moving to the cloud now.
Phillip Hampton is the founder and chairman of LOGICFORCE, a legal technology consultancy that improves the profitability and operations of law firms through the strategic application of technology.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllThe Forgotten Ballot: Expanding Voting Access for Incarcerated Populations
5 minute readRemembering Am Law 100 Firm Founder and 'Force of Nature' Stephen Cozen
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Distressed M&A: Mass Torts, Bankruptcy and Furthering the Search for Consensus: Another Purdue Decision
- 2For Safer Traffic Stops, Replace Paper Documents With ‘Contactless’ Tech
- 3As Second Trump Administration Approaches, Businesses Brace for Sweeping Changes to Immigration Policy
- 4General Warrants and ESI
- 5GC Pleads Guilty to Embezzling $7.4 Million From 3 Banks
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250