Bus Collided With Car's Open Door, Bystander Claimed Injuries
On Aug. 2, 2017, plaintiff Earnest Battle III, 27, approached his car, which was parked on Arch Street, in Philadelphia. Battle opened one of the car's doors, and the door was immediately struck by a passing transit bus.
April 09, 2020 at 03:39 PM
3 minute read
Battle v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority
$20,000 Verdict
Date of Verdict: Dec. 12, 2019.
Court and Case No.: C.P. Philadelphia No. 180903327.
Judge: Linda A. Carpenter.
Type of Action: Motor vehicle.
Injuries: Back and neck injuries.
Plaintiffs Counsel: Gerald J. Martillotti, Jerry Martillotti & Associates.
Plaintiffs Expert: Geoffrey W. Temple, family medicine, Philadelphia.
Defense Counsel: Louis S. Flocco, SEPTA Legal Department, Philadelphia.
Defense Expert: Lee J. Harris, neurology, Abington.
Comment:
On Aug. 2, 2017, plaintiff Earnest Battle III, 27, approached his car, which was parked on Arch Street, in Philadelphia. Battle opened one of the car's doors, and the door was immediately struck by a passing transit bus. Battle claimed that he was tossed onto the left side of the bus, that he fell onto the roadway, and that he suffered injuries of his back and neck.
Battle sued the bus's operator, the Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority. The lawsuit alleged that the bus's driver was negligent in his or her operation of the bus. The lawsuit further alleged that the Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority was vicariously liable for the driver's actions.
Battle claimed that the bus's driver veered out of the bus's lane of travel while passing a double-parked vehicle and initiated contact with the open door.
Defense counsel contended that the bus's driver was slowly and carefully navigating around the doubled-parked vehicle. He presented video footage of the accident, recorded by the bus's interior surveillance camera, and he claimed that the footage established that Battle carelessly opened the car door and initiated the contact between the door and the bus.
Battle was retrieved by an ambulance, and he was transported to a hospital. He underwent X-rays and minor treatment.
Battle ultimately claimed that he suffered protrusions of his C3-4 and C4-5 intervertebral discs, that he suffered trauma that produced a bulge of his L3-4 disc, that the accident aggravated pre-existing bulges of his L4-5 and L5-S1 discs, and that the accident aggravated pre-existing degeneration of his spine's cervical and lumbar regions. He also claimed that he developed residual impingement of a spinal nerve and resultant radiculopathy that stemmed from his cervical region.
Battle quickly commenced a course of physical therapy. The treatment lasted until Nov. 20, 2017.
Battle claimed that his back and neck remain painful, that his pain prevents his tolerance of prolonged periods in which he is seated or standing, and that he has been advised to avoid lifting objects whose weight exceeds 10 pounds. He also claimed that he requires administration of epidural injections of steroid-based painkillers. He sought recovery of damages for past and future pain and suffering.
The defense's expert neurologist opined that Battle suffered nothing more than a transient aggravation of a chronic, pre-existing lumbar injury and that the injury should have resolved after a short course of treatment. The expert also opined that Battle does not require further treatment.
The jury found that the parties were equally liable for the accident. It determined that Battle's damages totaled $20,000, but the comparative-negligence reduction produced a net recovery of $10,000.
This report is based on information that was provided by defense counsel. Plaintiffs counsel did not respond to the reporter's phone calls.
—This report first appeared in VerdictSearch, an ALM publication.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllPa. Federal District Courts Reach Full Complement Following Latest Confirmation
The Defense Bar Is Feeling the Strain: Busy Med Mal Trial Schedules Might Be Phila.'s 'New Normal'
7 minute readFederal Judge Allows Elderly Woman's Consumer Protection Suit to Proceed Against Citizens Bank
5 minute readJudge Leaves Statute of Limitations Question in Injury Crash Suit for a Jury
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Tuesday Newspaper
- 2Judicial Ethics Opinion 24-85
- 3Decision of the Day: Administrative Court Finds Prevailing Wage Law Applies to Workers Who Cleaned NYC Subways During Pandemic
- 4Trailblazing Broward Judge Retires; Legacy Includes Bush v. Gore
- 5Federal Judge Named in Lawsuit Over Underage Drinking Party at His California Home
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250