Pedestrian, Motorist Dispute Cause of Intersectional Accident
On April 6, 2018, plaintiff Marie McCabe, a woman in her mid-90s, was struck by, or collided with, a car. The incident occurred in a crosswalk of Sixth Street, alongside its intersection at Washington Square, in Center City.
April 09, 2020 at 03:43 PM
4 minute read
McCabe v. Spear
$12,000 Verdict
Date of Verdict: Jan. 16.
Court and Case No.: C.P. Philadelphia No. 180800578.
Judge: Lori A. Dumas.
Type of Action: Motor vehicle.
Injuries: Ear and foot injuries.
Plaintiffs Counsel: Norman W. Briggs, Briggs Law Office.
Plaintiffs Expert: Aaron L. Shapiro, otolaryngology, Bryn Mawr.
Defense Counsel: Warren D. Holland, Goldberg, Miller & Rubin, Philadelphia.
Comment:
On April 6, 2018, plaintiff Marie McCabe, a woman in her mid-90s, was struck by, or collided with, a car. The incident occurred in a crosswalk of Sixth Street, alongside its intersection at Washington Square, in Center City. McCabe fell onto the roadway, and she claimed that she suffered injuries of an ear and a foot.
McCabe sued the vehicle's driver, Nina Spear. The lawsuit alleged that Spear was negligent in the operation of her vehicle.
McCabe claimed that she was struck by Spear's car. McCabe's counsel argued that Spear failed to stop properly at a stop sign and, by failing to do so, drove into the intersection and struck McCabe.
Spear testified that she properly stopped at the stop sign and ensured a clear and safe distance, and that as she proceeded into the intersection, McCabe appeared out of nowhere and walked into the side of her car. The defense relied on an eyewitness, who also testified that McCabe had come out of nowhere. The defense argued that McCabe failed to yield to Spear, who had the right of way.
McCabe was taken by ambulance to a hospital. She was diagnosed with a Lisfranc fracture in the middle of her right foot. She was later diagnosed with hearing loss in her right ear.
McCabe's right foot was placed in a walking boot, and she was hospitalized until April 11, 2018. During her hospitalization, she received physical therapy. Upon discharge, McCabe came under the care of a podiatrist and temporarily used a walker. She was later fitted with orthotics. McCabe further treated with an otolaryngologist for her alleged hearing loss. It was recommended that she get a hearing aid, but McCabe declined. She received no further treatment.
McCabe's podiatrist testified that, considering McCabe's advanced age, she made a good recovery from her foot fracture.
McCabe's otolaryngologist opined that when McCabe hit the back of her head, upon falling to the ground after being struck by Spear's car, it caused her to suffer permanent hearing loss in her right ear.
McCabe testified that, despite her age, she was an active individual who lived independently. However, following the accident she suffered hearing loss and experienced apprehension when crossing the street. Her daughter testified that she had to help McCabe in the days following her discharge from the hospital and that her mother is not the same as she was prior to the accident. The elder McCabe sought damages for past and future pain and suffering.
The defense maintained that McCabe made a good recovery from her foot fracture, as confirmed by her podiatrist. The defense questioned the legitimacy of McCabe's claim of hearing loss, since her medical records indicated that she had hearing loss for years prior to the accident.
The jury found McCabe and Spear each 50 percent liable for the accident. McCabe was determined to receive $12,000, which was accordingly reduced to $6,000.
This report is based on information that was provided by defense counsel. Plaintiffs counsel did not respond to the reporter's phone calls.
—This report first appeared in VerdictSearch, an ALM publication
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllPa. Federal District Courts Reach Full Complement Following Latest Confirmation
The Defense Bar Is Feeling the Strain: Busy Med Mal Trial Schedules Might Be Phila.'s 'New Normal'
7 minute readFederal Judge Allows Elderly Woman's Consumer Protection Suit to Proceed Against Citizens Bank
5 minute readJudge Leaves Statute of Limitations Question in Injury Crash Suit for a Jury
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Tuesday Newspaper
- 2Judicial Ethics Opinion 24-85
- 3Decision of the Day: Administrative Court Finds Prevailing Wage Law Applies to Workers Who Cleaned NYC Subways During Pandemic
- 4Trailblazing Broward Judge Retires; Legacy Includes Bush v. Gore
- 5Federal Judge Named in Lawsuit Over Underage Drinking Party at His California Home
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250