Local 98 Wins $1.4M in Lawyer Fees for Suit Over Non-Union SEPTA Projects
In a dispute over non-union laborers working on SEPTA projects nearly 20 years ago, the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Local 98 has been awarded approximately $1.4 million in attorney fees from the resulting lawsuit.
April 13, 2020 at 06:36 PM
3 minute read
In a dispute over non-union laborers working on SEPTA projects nearly 20 years ago, the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Local 98 has been awarded approximately $1.4 million in attorney fees from the resulting lawsuit.
U.S. District Judge Mark Kearney of the Eastern District of Pennsylvania granted IBEW 98′s request for attorney fees in the long-running case against the Fairfield Co., which the union investigated for its use of non-union laborers employed to do electrical work on five federally funded transit projects in Philadelphia.
IBEW 98 filed a False Claims Act case against Fairfield in 2009, claiming the contractor violated the False Claims Act from 2001 to 2007 by having its unskilled groundsman do electrician work in order to pay them less. IBEW 98 tried to get the federal government to intervene in the case, but it declined.
The federal government would eventually involve itself in IBEW's affairs years later, although in a separate matter: union leader John "Johnny Doc" Dougherty was indicted in 2019 on bribery charges in which federal prosecutors alleged he bought off Philadelphia City Councilman Bobby Henon to do his bidding.
But prior to that, IBEW 98 prevailed in its false claims case and asked the judge for an award of over $2 million in attorney fees. However, Kearney said in an April 10 opinion that the request was too high.
"The union local now seeks an award of $2,006,224.80 in attorney's fees, $2,952 in a supplemental request in attorney's fees, and $223,541.42 in costs. Arguing the union local enjoyed only limited success, the contractor objects to the number of hours and increased hourly rates beyond what the union local incurred. We sustain the contractor's objections to the windfall increase in hourly rates and strike undescribed costs but otherwise overrule its objections," Kearney said.
The judge added that the attorneys earned their pay, but at times "over-lawyered" the case.
"A review of the extensive docket and filings confirms Local 98 and Farfield hired skilled lawyers who aggressively sought to further or defend their interests in a unique challenge by a union local to a contractor's worker classifications on federal funded projects under the False Claims Act. At times over the 12 years, both counsel over-lawyered the case," Kearney said.
"But our role today is not second-guessing lawyer effort at the moment or offering after-the-fact speculation on how counsel could have succeeded with less time invested," he continued. "Lawyers need to pursue discovery and remedies consistent with their professional obligations and accurately and contemporaneously record their efforts. Congress motivates private lawyers to pursue misrepresentations in federally funded projects by allowing them to move for reasonable fees and costs incurred in recovering funds for the United States."
James Goodley of Jennings Sigmond represents IBEW 98 and did not respond to a request for comment. Susan Friedman of Stevens & Lee represents Fairfield and did not respond to a request for comment.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllBig Law Communications, Media Attorneys Brace for Changes Under Trump
4 minute readPa. Judicial Nominee Advances While Trump Demands GOP Unity Against Biden Picks
4 minute readDemocrats Give Up Circuit Court Picks for Trial Judges in Reported Deal With GOP
Electronic Travel Authorization for Visa-Exempt Travelers to the US, UK and Europe
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Judicial Ethics Opinion 24-68
- 2Friday Newspaper
- 3Judge Denies Sean Combs Third Bail Bid, Citing Community Safety
- 4Republican FTC Commissioner: 'The Time for Rulemaking by the Biden-Harris FTC Is Over'
- 5NY Appellate Panel Cites Student's Disciplinary History While Sending Negligence Claim Against School District to Trial
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250