Local 98 Wins $1.4M in Lawyer Fees for Suit Over Non-Union SEPTA Projects
In a dispute over non-union laborers working on SEPTA projects nearly 20 years ago, the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Local 98 has been awarded approximately $1.4 million in attorney fees from the resulting lawsuit.
April 13, 2020 at 06:36 PM
3 minute read
In a dispute over non-union laborers working on SEPTA projects nearly 20 years ago, the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Local 98 has been awarded approximately $1.4 million in attorney fees from the resulting lawsuit.
U.S. District Judge Mark Kearney of the Eastern District of Pennsylvania granted IBEW 98′s request for attorney fees in the long-running case against the Fairfield Co., which the union investigated for its use of non-union laborers employed to do electrical work on five federally funded transit projects in Philadelphia.
IBEW 98 filed a False Claims Act case against Fairfield in 2009, claiming the contractor violated the False Claims Act from 2001 to 2007 by having its unskilled groundsman do electrician work in order to pay them less. IBEW 98 tried to get the federal government to intervene in the case, but it declined.
The federal government would eventually involve itself in IBEW's affairs years later, although in a separate matter: union leader John "Johnny Doc" Dougherty was indicted in 2019 on bribery charges in which federal prosecutors alleged he bought off Philadelphia City Councilman Bobby Henon to do his bidding.
But prior to that, IBEW 98 prevailed in its false claims case and asked the judge for an award of over $2 million in attorney fees. However, Kearney said in an April 10 opinion that the request was too high.
"The union local now seeks an award of $2,006,224.80 in attorney's fees, $2,952 in a supplemental request in attorney's fees, and $223,541.42 in costs. Arguing the union local enjoyed only limited success, the contractor objects to the number of hours and increased hourly rates beyond what the union local incurred. We sustain the contractor's objections to the windfall increase in hourly rates and strike undescribed costs but otherwise overrule its objections," Kearney said.
The judge added that the attorneys earned their pay, but at times "over-lawyered" the case.
"A review of the extensive docket and filings confirms Local 98 and Farfield hired skilled lawyers who aggressively sought to further or defend their interests in a unique challenge by a union local to a contractor's worker classifications on federal funded projects under the False Claims Act. At times over the 12 years, both counsel over-lawyered the case," Kearney said.
"But our role today is not second-guessing lawyer effort at the moment or offering after-the-fact speculation on how counsel could have succeeded with less time invested," he continued. "Lawyers need to pursue discovery and remedies consistent with their professional obligations and accurately and contemporaneously record their efforts. Congress motivates private lawyers to pursue misrepresentations in federally funded projects by allowing them to move for reasonable fees and costs incurred in recovering funds for the United States."
James Goodley of Jennings Sigmond represents IBEW 98 and did not respond to a request for comment. Susan Friedman of Stevens & Lee represents Fairfield and did not respond to a request for comment.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLawyers' Phones Are Ringing: What Should Employers Do If ICE Raids Their Business?
6 minute read3rd Circuit Strikes Down NLRB’s Monetary Remedies for Fired Starbucks Workers
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1RIP DOJ FCPA Corporate Prosecutions
- 2Federal Trade Commission’s Updates to the Health Breach Notification Rule Now In Effect
- 3I’m A Lawyer, What Can I Sell?
- 4Internal GC Hires Rebounded in '24, but Companies Still Drawn to Outside Candidates
- 5How I Made Office Managing Partner: 'Don’t Be an Opportunity Killer,' Says Thomas Haskins of Barnes & Thornburg
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250