Xarelto Judge Taps Attorneys to Allocate $93M in Fees to Leading Firms
The attorneys will be tasked with coming up with a recommendation for how the court should divide up the common benefit fund.
April 16, 2020 at 06:42 PM
4 minute read
Photo: Shutterstock.com
The federal judge handling the $775 million settlement over the blood thinner Xarelto has established a committee of five attorneys to assess how up to $93 million set aside for leading plaintiffs firms should be doled out.
U.S. District Judge Eldon Fallon of the Eastern District of Louisiana tapped Pensacola, Florida, attorney Brian Barr of Levin Papantonio Thomas Mitchell Rafferty & Proctor; Andy Birchfield of Beasley Allen in Montgomery, Alabama; Leonard Davis of Herman Herman & Katz in New Orleans; Gerald Meunier of Gainsburgh, Benjamin, David, Meunier & Warshauer, also in New Orleans; and Levin Sedran & Berman attorney Michael Weinkowitz in Philadelphia to form what the judge referred to as a "fee allocation liaison counsel" in the Xarelto litigation. The attorneys will be tasked with coming up with a recommendation for how the court should divide up the common benefit fund.
According to the judge's order from Monday, Fallon had intended to seek input from counsel directly, but the recent outbreak of coronavirus changed those plans.
"In light of the COVID-19 pandemic currently impacting the world and in an effort to create a process that both defers to the official mandates for social distancing and furthers the interests of counsel and the court in finalizing all remaining fee and cost issues, the court will modify its prior practice in seeking needed input from counsel regarding common benefit fee allocation," Fallon said. "The designated fee allocation liaison counsel shall work in consultation and cooperation with the plaintiffs' steering committee and the Xarelto plaintiffs' counsel leadership in arriving at a fee and cost allocation recommendation to the court."
According to Fallon's order, Philadelphia Court of Common Pleas Judge Arnold New will also designate an additional member for the common benefit counsel.
In spring 2019, the nationwide litigation over claims that Bayer and Johnson & Johnson failed to warn about the risks of the blood thinner Xarelto came to a global settlement of $775 million.
The litigation involved nearly 25,000 claims pending in a multidistrict litigation in federal court, as well as nearly 2,000 pending in Pennsylvania state court. Although some of the theories that were presented in the six cases that went to trial differed slightly, all of the filed cases are based on claims that Bayer and Janssen Pharmaceuticals, a subsidiary of Johnson & Johnson, failed to adequately warn that the drug could cause dangerous bleeding episodes, stroke and death.
The settlement came after several defense wins in both federal and Philadelphia state court.
Late last month, Fallon granted a request by the plaintiffs steering committee allocating up to $93 million, or 12% of the settlement funds, for the common benefit fund.
"Throughout this litigation, the court has recognized the complex nature of this multidistrict, multi-party litigation. At all times during this case—and still today—Xarelto has been available on the market and is widely prescribed," Fallon said. "Therefore, this litigation was particularly challenging and complex for plaintiffs. The court finds that the benchmark percentage adequately considers the novelty and difficulty of the questions presented by this particular case."
The order from Monday noted that so far 70 firms have submitted time and expenses to the court-appointed accountant.
In an emailed statement, Weinkowitz said the Xarelto litigation is a model of state and federal cooperation that has been "strongly encouraged and facilitated by Judge Fallon and Judge New."
"As a result, the MDL and state court attorneys worked very well together to advance the litigation on both fronts," Weinkowitz said. "I am proud to have been a part of the joint effort, and am grateful for the appointment to the committee."
Barr, Birchfield, Davis and Meunier each did not return a message seeking comment.
READ THE ORDER:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All![Ozempic Defendants Seek to Shave 'Tacked On' Claims From MDL Complaint Ozempic Defendants Seek to Shave 'Tacked On' Claims From MDL Complaint](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/thelegalintelligencer/contrib/content/uploads/sites/292/2024/01/Ozempic-767x633.jpg)
Ozempic Defendants Seek to Shave 'Tacked On' Claims From MDL Complaint
3 minute read![Plaintiff Argues Jury's $22M Punitive Damages Finding Undermines J&J's Talc Trial Win Plaintiff Argues Jury's $22M Punitive Damages Finding Undermines J&J's Talc Trial Win](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/thelegalintelligencer/contrib/content/uploads/sites/292/2023/05/Johnsons-Talc-Powder-6-767x633.jpg)
Plaintiff Argues Jury's $22M Punitive Damages Finding Undermines J&J's Talc Trial Win
4 minute read!['Discordant Dots': Why Phila. Zantac Judge Rejected Bid for His Recusal 'Discordant Dots': Why Phila. Zantac Judge Rejected Bid for His Recusal](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/thelegalintelligencer/contrib/content/uploads/sites/407/2024/09/Judge-Joshua-Roberts-767x633.jpg)
'Discordant Dots': Why Phila. Zantac Judge Rejected Bid for His Recusal
3 minute read![Pittsburgh Jury Tries to Award $22M Against J&J in Talc Case Despite Handing Up Defense Verdict Pittsburgh Jury Tries to Award $22M Against J&J in Talc Case Despite Handing Up Defense Verdict](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/31/28/31a2a5124c42a4922842768bfba7/johnson-johnson-vision-767x633.jpg)
Pittsburgh Jury Tries to Award $22M Against J&J in Talc Case Despite Handing Up Defense Verdict
4 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1U.S.- China Trade War: Lawyers and Clients Left 'Relying on the Governments to Sort This Out'
- 2Willkie Adds Five-Lawyer Team From Quinn Emanuel in Germany
- 3AI Discrimination and the 10-Step Bias Elimination Audit
- 4Return to Work Mandates Among Current Mental Health Stressors for Legal Professionals
- 5Friday Newspaper
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250