Wawa Agrees to Pay $3M in NJ Suit Over Child's Burns From Hot Water
The suit claimed Wawa dispensed the hot water at a dangerous temperature that would immediately cause burns if spilled on flesh and that Wawa knew of the hazard and acted with disregard for the safety of its customers.
April 20, 2020 at 04:54 PM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on New Jersey Law Journal
The family of a small child who allegedly suffered severe burns from hot water at a Wawa convenience store has agreed to a $3 million settlement of the suit in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey.
The settlement, approved by U.S. Magistrate Judge Tonianne Bongiovanni on March 30, calls for payment of $2,550,000 to the child, to be split between a trust and an annunity, and another $450,000 to her mother.
The child, identified in court papers as N.K., was 3 years old when she was injured during a visit to the Wawa store in Neptune, New Jersey, with her mother April 25, 2018. The mother, Roya Konzman, selected two cups of hot water for tea along with several other items and brought them to the register, where a clerk, who was ringing up the order, knocked over one of the cups of water. The top came off the cup and hot water splashed all over the upper body, arms and torso of N.K. She suffered second- and third-degree burns over 15% of her body.
The suit claimed the hot water, which came from a Cecilware water dispensing machine, was dispensed at a dangerous temperature that would immediately cause burns if spilled on flesh. The suit claimed Wawa knew of the hazard and acted with disregard for the safety of its customers. The injured child's mother also sought compensation for emotional distress that was caused by witnessing the injuries to her daughter and the pain and suffering they caused.
Wawa claimed in its answer to the complaint that, to the extend that its hot tea was served in a hazardous condition that caused the child's injury, the condition was "open and obvious." Wawa also claimed that negligence by the child's mother should bar or limit recovery and that the mother's failure to properly supervise the child should be considered a cause or contributing factor in the accident.
The case prompted talk radio station New Jersey 101.5 to compare the suit against Wawa to the 1994 New Mexico case where McDonald's was ordered to pay Stella Liebeck $640,000 after she spilled hot coffee on her lap.
But the lawyer for the Konzman family, David Mazie, of Mazie, Slater, Katz & Freeman in Roseland, New Jersey, told the radio station that his case rested on a different legal theory from the one in the McDonald's case. That's because the child's injuries were caused by the negligence of an employee, Mazie said. The attorney told the radio station in an interview that water from the Wawa water dispenser was 180 degrees, compared with 104 degrees in a typical shower.
In the order approving the settlement, Bongiovanni signed off on the payment of $14,908 in expenses, $597,150 in legal fees and a health insurance lien for $36,460 from the child's portion of the settlement, with the remaining $1,901,482 being split between a support trust and a structured settlement annunity.
The judge also approved costs of $2,631 in expenses and $149,123 in legal fees from the mother's portion of the settlement, leaving her with net proceeds of $298,246.
Mazie declined to comment on the settlement. Wawa's lawyer, Betsy Ramos of Capehart Scatchard in Mount Laurel, New Jersey, did not respond to a request for comment. Wawa also did not respond to a request for comment.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllPlaintiffs Seek Redo of First Trial Over Medical Device Plant's Emissions
4 minute readRemembering Am Law 100 Firm Founder and 'Force of Nature' Stephen Cozen
5 minute readEckert Seamans Snags Reed Smith Global Financial Intelligence Director
3 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250