Pa. Courts Allowed to Restore Limited Operations as State Eases Into Reopening
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court has authorized local courts to restore limited operations to the jurisdictions previously halted due to the spread of COVID-19, but extended the statewide judicial emergency to June 1.
April 28, 2020 at 02:25 PM
3 minute read
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court has authorized local courts to restore limited operations to the jurisdictions previously halted due to the spread of COVID-19, but extended the statewide judicial emergency to June 1.
In an order issued Tuesday, Chief Justice Thomas Saylor granted the regional president judges discretion to determine which aspects of their court operations to resume, also providing strict limitations for in-person proceedings.
"Courts play a central role in our constitutional democracy, and it's important to ensure that they are available to those seeking vindication of their rights or resolution of disputes," Saylor said. "The COVID-19 health emergency has forced everyone to adapt, and courts have quickly adjusted to handle a wide range of matters remotely."
He continued, "While the court has extended the judicial emergency through June 1, 2020, in order to provide president judges with authority to address varying local conditions, we recognize the need to move beyond emergency matters to a much broader range of court functions. We do so, however, giving priority to our most critical functions and in a manner consistent with public health and safety."
If court leaders feel restrictions are needed beyond June 1, they must provide their reasons to the Supreme Court, according to the order.
The order said with the exception of speedy trial matters, the court deadline hold is extended until May 11. Jury trials (both criminal and civil) remain suspended and will be scheduled for a date in the future. The order also stated that evictions and dispossession of property are still prohibited until May 11, given the economic impact the pandemic has had on Pennsylvanians.
The Supreme Court declared the statewide judicial emergency March 16.
After Montgomery County Court of Common Pleas President Judge Thomas DelRicci asked the Supreme Court for a declaration of judicial emergency in the county, the justices largely granted the motion, but did not make an immediate ruling at the time on the request to suspend Pennsylvania Rule of Criminal Procedure 600, which grants defendants the right to a speedy trial. Instead the justices held the request under advisement.
In the weeks that followed the Pennsylvania Supreme Court ordering nearly all judicial services shut down as a means of combating the coronavirus, many of the state's largest court systems reduced their prison population by 20% or more. In Allegheny County, the number of people in the local jails dropped by nearly 30%, between March 1 and March 31. In Philadelphia, however, the prison population reduction remained at less than 10% earlier this month.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllCourt Sanctions Attorney $7.5K for Filing Repeated Erroneous Complaints
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1The Importance of Federal Rule of Evidence 502 and Its Impact on Privilege
- 2What’s at Stake in Supreme Court Case Over Religious Charter School?
- 3People in the News—Jan. 30, 2025—Rubin Glickman, Goldberg Segalla
- 4Georgia Republicans Push to Limit Lawsuits. But Would That Keep Insurance Rates From Rising?
- 5Trending Issues in Florida Construction Law That Attorneys Need to Be Aware Of
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250