Court Calls for New Med Mal Trial, Reversing Ruling That Expert Testimony Was Insufficient
Providing guidance on the necessary elements of expert testimony in a medical malpractice case, the Pennsylvania Superior Court has reversed a trial judge's grant of nonsuit in favor of a Lancaster County surgeon sued for negligence after one of his patients died of a pulmonary embolism following colon surgery.
April 30, 2020 at 03:01 PM
3 minute read
Photo: Shutterstock
Providing guidance on the necessary elements of expert testimony in a medical malpractice case, the Pennsylvania Superior Court has reversed a trial judge's grant of nonsuit in favor of a Lancaster County surgeon sued for negligence after one of his patients died of a pulmonary embolism following colon surgery.
A three-judge panel consisting of Judges Victor Stabile, Maria McLaughlin and John Musmanno tossed the judgment in favor of defendants Dr. Joseph Voystock and Surgical Specialists of Lancaster and awarded plaintiff Francisco Rolon, widower of Maria Sanchez-Rodriguez, a new trial.
According to Stabile's precedential April 28 opinion in Rolon v. Davies, Voystock performed a hemicolectomy on Sanchez-Rodriguez on April 20, 2010. On May 19, the patient went back to the hospital complaining of pain in her right lower back, right hip and right leg as well as a swollen, blue leg.
Tests for clots and deep vein thrombosis came back negative. According to Stabile, Voystock ordered an arterial study, which also showed no problems. Given the test results and her improving condition, Sanchez-Rodriguez was released.
Within an hour of her discharge, Sanchez-Rodriguez collapsed and died. The plaintiff filed a subsequent medical negligence action.
At the trial level, the defendants moved for a nonsuit, claiming the plaintiff's expert, Dr. David Campbell, did not offer his opinion to a reasonable degree of medical certainty in accord with Pennsylvania law on Voystock's alleged negligence. The judge granted the motion and the jury returned a defense verdict.
On appeal, Rolon argued that the judge erred by granting the defendants' motion for nonsuit. The Superior Court agreed.
"The import of Dr. Campbell's testimony is that Dr. Voystock breached the standard of care by failing to diagnose DVT and treat decedent accordingly," Stabile said. "He stated he was certain of his opinion, and he explained that the ultrasound of decedent's lower leg evidenced a blockage higher up. The ultrasound results, in tandem with Decedent's recent surgery, led Dr. Campbell to opine that a pelvic DVT, despite its rarity, had to be ruled out in this case. Thus, not only did Dr. Campbell express his certainty as to his opinion, he provided a thorough explanation of how he arrived at that opinion given the evidence before him. Dr. Campbell also explained why the evidence did not support Dr. Voystock's diagnosis."
Because of that, Rolon was entitled to a new trial.
Mark Atlee of Atlee Hall in Lancaster represents the plaintiff and did not respond to a request for comment.
The defendants are represented by James Saxton of Saxton & Stump in Lancaster, who did not respond to a request for comment.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All![People in the News—Dec. 18, 2024—Faegre Drinker, Antheil Maslow People in the News—Dec. 18, 2024—Faegre Drinker, Antheil Maslow](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/f5/a1/946d9afa4f1687462a6c289fe67a/lange-au-767x633.jpg)
![Increased Costs Proved a Drag on Profits for PA's AmLaw 200 in 2024 Increased Costs Proved a Drag on Profits for PA's AmLaw 200 in 2024](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/thelegalintelligencer/contrib/content/uploads/sites/415/2021/12/2021-12-21-volatility_Adobe_640x640.jpg)
![Judges Push for Action to Combat Increasing Threats Against Judiciary Judges Push for Action to Combat Increasing Threats Against Judiciary](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/thelegalintelligencer/contrib/content/uploads/sites/402/2023/05/Philadelphia-City-Hall-05-767x633.jpg)
Judges Push for Action to Combat Increasing Threats Against Judiciary
3 minute read![Hospital Must Provide Pre-Complaint Discovery in Privacy Breach Case, Pa. Judge Rules Hospital Must Provide Pre-Complaint Discovery in Privacy Breach Case, Pa. Judge Rules](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/thelegalintelligencer/contrib/content/uploads/sites/399/2024/08/hospital-767x633.jpg)
Hospital Must Provide Pre-Complaint Discovery in Privacy Breach Case, Pa. Judge Rules
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Aging Condo Neglect Leads to $1M Payout in Miami Beach Slip and Fall
- 2‘BiT Global Lost’: Federal Judge Won’t Stop Coinbase From Delisting wBTC Token
- 3Some Elite Universities Favor Wealthy Students in Admissions Decisions, Lawsuit Alleges
- 4Judge Asks: Should Tom Girardi Serve Sentence in a Medical Facility or Behind Bars?
- 5EPA grants California authority to ban sales of new gas cars by 2035. Action faces reversal by Trump
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250