Plaintiff Made Good Recovery From Fracture After Fall: Defense
On March 2, 2015, plaintiff Kenneth Benish, 52, a service technician, slipped and fell at 307 Pappan Drive, in Imperial. Benish suffered a leg fracture. He claimed that he slipped and fell on snow and ice.
April 30, 2020 at 03:18 PM
3 minute read
Benish v. Smeltzer
Defense Verdict
Date of Verdict: Nov. 20, 2019.
Court and Case No.: C.P. Allegheny No. GD-16-021987.
Judge: Michael A. Della Vecchia.
Type of Action: Premises liability.
Injuries: Leg fracture.
Plaintiffs Counsel: Michael E. Megrey, Woomer & Talarico.
Plaintiffs Expert: Victoria M. Langa, orthopedic surgery; Pittsburgh.
Defense Counsel: Thomas W. Summers, Summers, McDonnell, Hudock, Guthrie & Rauch, Pittsburgh.
Defense Expert: Charles J. Burke III, orthopedic surgery; Pittsburgh.
Comment:
On March 2, 2015, plaintiff Kenneth Benish, 52, a service technician, slipped and fell at 307 Pappan Drive, in Imperial. Benish suffered a leg fracture. He claimed that he slipped and fell on snow and ice.
Benish sued the property owner, Mary Ann Smeltzer. Benish alleged that Smeltzer was negligent for allowing a dangerous condition to exist. At the time of the accident, Benish was in the course and scope of his employment assisting Smeltzer, who was having car trouble. Benish alleged that he was walking on Smeltzer's driveway when he slipped on ice, slid about a foot and a half forward and fell, landing on his right ankle. Benish's counsel argued that Smeltzer did not take appropriate measures to prepare for his arrival, as she failed to eliminate the ice from the driveway by treating it properly with salt or some other anti-slip substance. Smeltzer's negligence in failing to adequately treat the driveway surface caused Benish's accident, his counsel argued.
The defense maintained that Benish was contributorily negligent. According to the defense, prior to the accident, Benish walked on Smeltzer's driveway to access her vehicle without any difficulties. If there was snow or ice in the driveway, he should have avoided it when he rewalked on the driveway after looking at Smeltzer's vehicle, the defense contended.
Following the accident, Benish drove himself to an emergency room and was X-rayed. He was diagnosed with a sprain of the right ankle. He was given crutches and pain medication, and was discharged with instructions to follow up with an orthopedist.
Benish was ultimately diagnosed with a nondisplaced fracture of the right distal fibula. He came under the care of an orthopedic surgeon and was put on a course of physical therapy, which he follow through June 2015, more than three months after the accident. He received no additional further treatment.
Benish's orthopedic surgeon attributed Benish's injuries and treatment to the accident. The physician determined that Benish made a good recovery.
Benish testified that he was severely restricted following the accident, as he was unable to work for 16 weeks and had difficulty standing for long periods and lifting heavy objects. He stated that he continues to experience occasional ankle pain after prolonged periods of standing. Benish sought to recover $8,163.03 in medical costs and $9,004 in lost wages, plus damages for past and future pain and suffering.
The defense's expert in orthopedic surgery testified that Benish made a full recovery with no ongoing restrictions, as evidenced by the fact that he had been released to his job duties with no limitations.
The jury found that Smeltzer was not negligent.
This report is based on information that was provided by defense counsel. Plaintiffs counsel did not respond to calls for comment.
—This report first appeared in VerdictSearch, an ALM publication
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllPa. Federal District Courts Reach Full Complement Following Latest Confirmation
The Defense Bar Is Feeling the Strain: Busy Med Mal Trial Schedules Might Be Phila.'s 'New Normal'
7 minute readFederal Judge Allows Elderly Woman's Consumer Protection Suit to Proceed Against Citizens Bank
5 minute readJudge Leaves Statute of Limitations Question in Injury Crash Suit for a Jury
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Federal Judge Named in Lawsuit Over Underage Drinking Party at His California Home
- 2'Almost an Arms Race': California Law Firms Scooped Up Lateral Talent by the Handful in 2024
- 3Pittsburgh Judge Rules Loan Company's Online Arbitration Agreement Unenforceable
- 4As a New Year Dawns, the Value of Florida’s Revised Mediation Laws Comes Into Greater Focus
- 5Managing Partner Vindicated in Disciplinary Proceeding Brought by Former Associate
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250