Phila. Bar Association Urges Courts to Expand Remote Civil Proceedings During Pandemic
"Motions, case management conferences, discovery matters and settlement conferences can, and should be, handled remotely," Bar Association Chancellor A. Michael Snyder said in a statement Friday. "It is critical that the system not become backlogged so significantly that recovery becomes drawn out."
May 01, 2020 at 03:20 PM
3 minute read
The Philadelphia Bar Association has asked the city's courts to consider opening up more aspects of the civil litigation system to remote operation during the COVID-19 pandemic.
In a statement issued Friday, Bar Association Chancellor A. Michael Snyder acknowledged the technological limitations of the court system and the need to keep physical contact in the courts to a minimum.
"However, we believe that there are significant parts of the civil litigation system that can be effectively handled remotely," Snyder said. "Motions, case management conferences, discovery matters and settlement conferences can, and should be, handled remotely. It is critical that the system not become backlogged so significantly that recovery becomes drawn out. We must each remember that justice delayed is justice denied."
He continued, "We are pleased to learn that the court has just issued orders relative to settlement conferences, allowing them to be conducted by judges pro tem using telephonic or videoconferencing technology. In addition, the court has instituted a new procedure to address case management conferences which had already been scheduled, but not held; in that case, those conferences have been waived and the new procedure is posted on the association's website. Both of these new procedures have been sent to all members of the association by HTML emails.
"Motions for extraordinary relief, discovery matters, and other motions have not yet been affirmatively addressed. It is our understanding that various working groups of the court are addressing these issues, although we have not been given any specific timelines for their implementation," Snyder said.
The First Judicial District did not respond to a request seeking comment.
The bar association's statement comes shortly after the state Supreme Court announced that regional courts could determine how soon and how much of their operations to restore to pre-pandemic status.
If court leaders feel restrictions are needed beyond June 1, they must provide their reasons to the Supreme Court, according to the order.
The order said with the exception of speedy trial matters, the court deadline hold is extended until May 11. Jury trials (both criminal and civil) remain suspended and will be scheduled for a date in the future. The order also stated that evictions and dispossession of property are still prohibited until May 11, given the economic impact the pandemic has had on Pennsylvanians.
The Supreme Court declared the statewide judicial emergency March 16.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllPa. Federal District Courts Reach Full Complement Following Latest Confirmation
The Defense Bar Is Feeling the Strain: Busy Med Mal Trial Schedules Might Be Phila.'s 'New Normal'
7 minute readFederal Judge Allows Elderly Woman's Consumer Protection Suit to Proceed Against Citizens Bank
5 minute readJudge Leaves Statute of Limitations Question in Injury Crash Suit for a Jury
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1DeepSeek Isn’t Yet Impacting Legal Tech Development. But That Could Soon Change.
- 2'Landmark' New York Commission Set to Study Overburdened, Under-Resourced Family Courts
- 3Wave of Commercial Real Estate Refinance Could Drown Property Owners
- 4Redeveloping Real Estate After Natural Disasters: Challenges, Strategies and Opportunities
- 5Calif. Fires Should Serve as a Reminder to Fla.’s Commercial Landlords and Tenants Not to Be Complacent
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250