Phila. Bar Association Urges Courts to Expand Remote Civil Proceedings During Pandemic
"Motions, case management conferences, discovery matters and settlement conferences can, and should be, handled remotely," Bar Association Chancellor A. Michael Snyder said in a statement Friday. "It is critical that the system not become backlogged so significantly that recovery becomes drawn out."
May 01, 2020 at 03:20 PM
3 minute read
The Philadelphia Bar Association has asked the city's courts to consider opening up more aspects of the civil litigation system to remote operation during the COVID-19 pandemic.
In a statement issued Friday, Bar Association Chancellor A. Michael Snyder acknowledged the technological limitations of the court system and the need to keep physical contact in the courts to a minimum.
"However, we believe that there are significant parts of the civil litigation system that can be effectively handled remotely," Snyder said. "Motions, case management conferences, discovery matters and settlement conferences can, and should be, handled remotely. It is critical that the system not become backlogged so significantly that recovery becomes drawn out. We must each remember that justice delayed is justice denied."
He continued, "We are pleased to learn that the court has just issued orders relative to settlement conferences, allowing them to be conducted by judges pro tem using telephonic or videoconferencing technology. In addition, the court has instituted a new procedure to address case management conferences which had already been scheduled, but not held; in that case, those conferences have been waived and the new procedure is posted on the association's website. Both of these new procedures have been sent to all members of the association by HTML emails.
"Motions for extraordinary relief, discovery matters, and other motions have not yet been affirmatively addressed. It is our understanding that various working groups of the court are addressing these issues, although we have not been given any specific timelines for their implementation," Snyder said.
The First Judicial District did not respond to a request seeking comment.
The bar association's statement comes shortly after the state Supreme Court announced that regional courts could determine how soon and how much of their operations to restore to pre-pandemic status.
If court leaders feel restrictions are needed beyond June 1, they must provide their reasons to the Supreme Court, according to the order.
The order said with the exception of speedy trial matters, the court deadline hold is extended until May 11. Jury trials (both criminal and civil) remain suspended and will be scheduled for a date in the future. The order also stated that evictions and dispossession of property are still prohibited until May 11, given the economic impact the pandemic has had on Pennsylvanians.
The Supreme Court declared the statewide judicial emergency March 16.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllPa. Federal District Courts Reach Full Complement Following Latest Confirmation
The Defense Bar Is Feeling the Strain: Busy Med Mal Trial Schedules Might Be Phila.'s 'New Normal'
7 minute readFederal Judge Allows Elderly Woman's Consumer Protection Suit to Proceed Against Citizens Bank
5 minute readJudge Leaves Statute of Limitations Question in Injury Crash Suit for a Jury
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Decision of the Day: Judge Reduces $287M Jury Verdict Against Harley-Davidson in Wrongful Death Suit
- 2Kirkland to Covington: 2024's International Chart Toppers and Award Winners
- 3Decision of the Day: Judge Denies Summary Judgment Motions in Suit by Runner Injured in Brooklyn Bridge Park
- 4KISS, Profit Motive and Foreign Currency Contracts
- 512 Days of … Web Analytics
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250