Philadelphia Court Officials Suspend Jury Trials Through Early September
Attorney Shanin Specter said the court's decision to extend the suspension of jury trials was understandable given the situation, however, he said the legal community should begin considering new and creative approaches.
May 18, 2020 at 05:14 PM
3 minute read
While some jurisdictions are making efforts to bring back the jury trial, Philadelphia court leaders have announced it has canceled jury selection through early September.
First Judicial District President Judge Idee Fox has ordered that all criminal and civil jury trials will be suspended through Sept. 8. The order means that jury trials in the Philadelphia Court of Common Pleas are set to see a total suspension of nearly six months, after court leadership initially decided to suspend court proceedings beginning in mid-March.
The order, issued late May 15, also states that, unless attorneys are otherwise notified in their specific cases, all trials, hearings and conferences scheduled through July 6 have been administratively canceled and will be rescheduled. Attorneys will also not be able to file papers in person, but, the order noted, legal papers can still be filed using the electronic filing system.
Since the court closures began taking effect two months ago in an effort to help stem the spread of the highly contagious coronavirus, some attorneys have voiced frustrations, and others have said the shutdowns have increased cooperation among the parties.
Many attorneys now say they have adapted to the new normal.
"You know about the five stages of grief? Well, I'm past stage four, which is depression, and am firmly into acceptance, which is stage five," Kline & Specter attorney Shanin Specter said.
Specter said the court's decision to extend the suspension of jury trials was understandable given the situation, however, he said the legal community should begin considering new and creative approaches that could allow for trials to start up again despite the virus. For one thing, he suggested seating only a few in the jury box and the remainder in the gallery. He also suggested having jurors assemble in the courtroom, rather than in the more cramped jury assembly rooms.
"There are obvious obstacles to recovering jury trials, but we of course need to reconvene jury trials as soon as humanly possible," Specter said. "I'm sensitive to the city's concern about not spending money, but the things I'm talking about can be done without spending any additional money."
Although the FJD's order ensures jury trials won't be back in Philadelphia any time soon, other jurisdictions across the country have begun experimenting with ways to bring back jury trials. The efforts have been met with varying results.
In Ashland County, Ohio, a trial was set to begin in late April, however, during voir dire the defendant was struggling to breathe and nearly collapsed in the courtroom. Although he eventually tested negative for COVID-19, both he and his attorney, who helped physically carry him out of the courtroom, were ordered to quarantine. That trial was eventually postponed until June.
On Monday, a judge in Texas also convened a jury pool using videoconferencing technology. According to Texas Lawyer, the proceedings went smoothly, until, about 30 minutes into the proceedings, a juror wandered off screen during a break to take a phone call and couldn't hear the judges calling him back.
A court spokesman declined to immediately comment Monday afternoon.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAm Law 100 Lateral Partner Hiring Rose in 2024: Report
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Uber Files RICO Suit Against Plaintiff-Side Firms Alleging Fraudulent Injury Claims
- 2The Law Firm Disrupted: Scrutinizing the Elephant More Than the Mouse
- 3Inherent Diminished Value Damages Unavailable to 3rd-Party Claimants, Court Says
- 4Pa. Defense Firm Sued by Client Over Ex-Eagles Player's $43.5M Med Mal Win
- 5Losses Mount at Morris Manning, but Departing Ex-Chair Stays Bullish About His Old Firm's Future
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250