Philadelphia Court Officials Suspend Jury Trials Through Early September
Attorney Shanin Specter said the court's decision to extend the suspension of jury trials was understandable given the situation, however, he said the legal community should begin considering new and creative approaches.
May 18, 2020 at 05:14 PM
3 minute read
While some jurisdictions are making efforts to bring back the jury trial, Philadelphia court leaders have announced it has canceled jury selection through early September.
First Judicial District President Judge Idee Fox has ordered that all criminal and civil jury trials will be suspended through Sept. 8. The order means that jury trials in the Philadelphia Court of Common Pleas are set to see a total suspension of nearly six months, after court leadership initially decided to suspend court proceedings beginning in mid-March.
The order, issued late May 15, also states that, unless attorneys are otherwise notified in their specific cases, all trials, hearings and conferences scheduled through July 6 have been administratively canceled and will be rescheduled. Attorneys will also not be able to file papers in person, but, the order noted, legal papers can still be filed using the electronic filing system.
Since the court closures began taking effect two months ago in an effort to help stem the spread of the highly contagious coronavirus, some attorneys have voiced frustrations, and others have said the shutdowns have increased cooperation among the parties.
Many attorneys now say they have adapted to the new normal.
"You know about the five stages of grief? Well, I'm past stage four, which is depression, and am firmly into acceptance, which is stage five," Kline & Specter attorney Shanin Specter said.
Specter said the court's decision to extend the suspension of jury trials was understandable given the situation, however, he said the legal community should begin considering new and creative approaches that could allow for trials to start up again despite the virus. For one thing, he suggested seating only a few in the jury box and the remainder in the gallery. He also suggested having jurors assemble in the courtroom, rather than in the more cramped jury assembly rooms.
"There are obvious obstacles to recovering jury trials, but we of course need to reconvene jury trials as soon as humanly possible," Specter said. "I'm sensitive to the city's concern about not spending money, but the things I'm talking about can be done without spending any additional money."
Although the FJD's order ensures jury trials won't be back in Philadelphia any time soon, other jurisdictions across the country have begun experimenting with ways to bring back jury trials. The efforts have been met with varying results.
In Ashland County, Ohio, a trial was set to begin in late April, however, during voir dire the defendant was struggling to breathe and nearly collapsed in the courtroom. Although he eventually tested negative for COVID-19, both he and his attorney, who helped physically carry him out of the courtroom, were ordered to quarantine. That trial was eventually postponed until June.
On Monday, a judge in Texas also convened a jury pool using videoconferencing technology. According to Texas Lawyer, the proceedings went smoothly, until, about 30 minutes into the proceedings, a juror wandered off screen during a break to take a phone call and couldn't hear the judges calling him back.
A court spokesman declined to immediately comment Monday afternoon.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSpecial Section: Products Liability, Mass Torts & Class Action/Personal Injury
2 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1New Associates Yearbook 2024
- 2Disbarred Attorney Alleges ADA Violations in Lawsuit Against Miami-Dade Judges
- 3Free Speech Causes a Neighborly Feud
- 4Read the Document: 'Google Must Divest Chrome,' DOJ Says, Proposing Remedies in Search Monopoly Case
- 5Voir Dire Voyeur: I Find Out What Kind of Juror I’d Be
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250