Just about everyone’s heard of a “nanny cam,” the small hidden camera parents can use to keep a watchful eye on their children’s caretakers. But does the device’s place in the cultural zeitgeist mean a babysitter working in the home of a child’s parents should assume they’re being recorded?
That was one of several tricky privacy questions the justices raised during the second argument of their first-ever livestreamed oral argument session Tuesday.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]