Defense: Plaintiff Admittedly Distracted When She Fell
On June 18, 2014, plaintiff Jeanette Nadwodny, an executive assistant in her late 40s, was walking on a concrete walkway at 1536 N. Pleasantview Road in Sanatoga. She tripped and fell. Nadwodny suffered a fracture of her finger.
May 21, 2020 at 02:47 PM
4 minute read
Nadwodny v. Chrusch
Defense Verdict
Date of Verdict: Jan. 16.
Court and Case No.: C.P. Montgomery No. 2016-12505.
Judge: Richard P. Haaz.
Type of Action: Premises liability, slip and fall.
Injuries: Finger fracture.
Plaintiffs Counsel: Gerald J. Mullaney Jr., Mullaney & Mullaney, Philadelphia.
Plaintiffs Experts: Stuart L. Trager, orthopedic surgery, Philadelphia.
Defense Counsel: Joseph F. Murphy, Bennett Bricklin & Saltzburg, Philadelphia.
Defense Expert: William H. Kirkpatrick, orthopedic surgery, Bryn Mawr.
Comment:
On June 18, 2014, plaintiff Jeanette Nadwodny, an executive assistant in her late 40s, was walking on a concrete walkway at 1536 N. Pleasantview Road in Sanatoga. She tripped and fell. Nadwodny suffered a fracture of her finger.
Nadwodny sued the property owners, Kenneth Chrusch and Judith Chrusch. Nadwodny alleged that they were negligent for allowing a dangerous condition to exist. At the time of the accident, Nadwodny, who was friends with the Chrusches, was pet sitting their dog. She was walking on a concrete walkway from their driveway to the Chrusches' home when her foot allegedly caught a raised concrete slab, causing her to fall forward with her hands extended.
Nadwodny's counsel argued that the Chrusches, by their own admission, were aware of the elevation differential and that it was a dangerous condition, yet they failed to remediate it properly.
The defense maintained that Nadwodny was contributorily negligent. Nadwodny stated that she was distracted by a dead tree branch in the yard. Additionally, Nadwodny, had been at the Chrusches' house multiple times on prior occasions and was aware of the walkway's height differential, and therefore she should have avoided it, the defense argued.
Following the June 18, 2014, accident, Nadwodny presented to an emergency room and was diagnosed with a fracture of her right little finger, of her dominant arm. Her finger was splinted and she was discharged.
Nadwodny was later diagnosed with carpal tunnel syndrome.
Within days of the accident, Nadwodny underwent an open reduction and internal fixation on her fractured finger, in which pins and plates were implanted. For the next two months, Nadwodny treated with physical therapy. In September 2014 she underwent a revision surgery of the fracture site, and in October the hardware was surgically removed. Through March 15 she continued to treat with physical therapy and consult with her surgeon; Nadwodny received no further treatment thereafter.
Nadwodny's expert in orthopedic surgery testified that Nadwodny suffered a permanent injury and has permanent limitations of her hand, including impaired grip strength. If her condition worsens, she may require another surgery, the expert concluded.
Nadwodny testified that she suffers from ongoing pain in her hand and diminished grip strength. She allegedly has difficulty opening jars and door knobs. Nadwodny sought to recover a medical lien of approximately $27,000, plus damages for past and future pain and suffering.
Her husband sought damages for his claim for loss of consortium.
The defense cited the medical records of Nadwodny's orthopedic surgeon, who noted that Nadwodny had normal grip strength upon her discharge in March 2015.
The defense's expert in orthopedic surgery, who examined Nadwodny, testified that Nadwodny may have some limitations in the future; however, she requires no future treatment.
The jury found Nadwodny was 55% liable and Chrusch was 45% liable.
This report is based on information that was provided by defense counsel. Plaintiffs counsel did not respond to the reporter's phone calls.
—This report first appeared in VerdictSearch, an ALM publication
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllPa. Federal District Courts Reach Full Complement Following Latest Confirmation
The Defense Bar Is Feeling the Strain: Busy Med Mal Trial Schedules Might Be Phila.'s 'New Normal'
7 minute readFederal Judge Allows Elderly Woman's Consumer Protection Suit to Proceed Against Citizens Bank
5 minute readJudge Leaves Statute of Limitations Question in Injury Crash Suit for a Jury
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Federal Judge Named in Lawsuit Over Underage Drinking Party at His California Home
- 2'Almost an Arms Race': California Law Firms Scooped Up Lateral Talent by the Handful in 2024
- 3Pittsburgh Judge Rules Loan Company's Online Arbitration Agreement Unenforceable
- 4As a New Year Dawns, the Value of Florida’s Revised Mediation Laws Comes Into Greater Focus
- 5Managing Partner Vindicated in Disciplinary Proceeding Brought by Former Associate
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250