Parties Dispute Cause of Physical Altercation at Legion Meeting
On April 20, 2017, plaintiff Leonard Dinaples, 70, and James Drnjevich got into a physical altercation at the American Legion Post 711, in Murrysville. Dinaples suffered facial injuries.
May 21, 2020 at 12:29 PM
3 minute read
Dinaples v. Drnjevich
$3,789.03 Verdict
Date of Verdict: Jan. 7.
Court and Case No.: Westmoreland County Civil Court No. 1419 of 2018
Judge: Christian F. Scherer.
Type of Action: Intentional tort.
Injuries: Facial abrasions.
Plaintiffs Counsel: Michael D. Lazzaro, Mears, Smith, Houser, and Boyle.
Defense Counsel: Adam J. Long, Long & Long, Greensburg.
Comment:
On April 20, 2017, plaintiff Leonard Dinaples, 70, and James Drnjevich got into a physical altercation at the American Legion Post 711, in Murrysville. Dinaples suffered facial injuries. Dinaples sued Drnjevich. He alleged that Drnjevich committed assault and battery.
Dinaples and Drnjevich were American Legion members. On April 20, 2017, prior to the start of an American Legion meeting, Dinaples told Drnjevich that he had been contacted by the state about wearing politically affiliated clothing at a previous American Legion meeting. He asked Drnjevich whether he knew anything about how the state learned of this. Drnjevich claimed that he did not know anything, and the meeting subsequently started.
According to Dinaples, following the meeting, Drnjevich went outside but immediately returned, at which point he went up to Dinaples and sucker-punched him in the face. Dinaples fell to the ground, and then Drnjevich punched him repeatedly, until other meeting attendees pulled him off Dinaples, Dinaples claimed.
Dinaples' counsel argued that Drnjevich attacked Drnjevich for no reason, and that he should be found liable for assault and battery.
The defense maintained that Dinaples initiated the physical altercation. Drnjevich denied Dinaples' account of the incident. He testified that Dinaples initiated the fight by punching him in the mouth; Drnjevich merely responded in self-defense by pushing Dinaples away from him to prevent further attacks.
On April 21, 2017, the day after the altercation, Dinaples presented to an emergency room. He complained of face pain, a dislodged dental bridge in his upper jaw, and cuts and abrasions on his back. He was given pain medication and discharged.
Within days of the accident, Dinaples presented to his dentist to address the removed bridge. However, due to lack of dental coverage, Dinaples was unable to have the bridge re-implanted. He received no further treatment.
Dinaples' counsel attributed Dinaples' injuries and treatment to the accident and asserted that Dinaples requires future dental treatment. Dinaples sought to recover $3,789.03 in future medical costs, plus damages for past and future pain and suffering.
The jury found Drnjevich liable for assault and battery. Dinaples was determined to receive $3,789.03.
This report is based on information that was provided by plaintiffs and defense counsel.
—This report first appeared in VerdictSearch, an ALM publication
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllPa. Federal District Courts Reach Full Complement Following Latest Confirmation
The Defense Bar Is Feeling the Strain: Busy Med Mal Trial Schedules Might Be Phila.'s 'New Normal'
7 minute readFederal Judge Allows Elderly Woman's Consumer Protection Suit to Proceed Against Citizens Bank
5 minute readJudge Leaves Statute of Limitations Question in Injury Crash Suit for a Jury
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Decision of the Day: Judge Reduces $287M Jury Verdict Against Harley-Davidson in Wrongful Death Suit
- 2Kirkland to Covington: 2024's International Chart Toppers and Award Winners
- 3Decision of the Day: Judge Denies Summary Judgment Motions in Suit by Runner Injured in Brooklyn Bridge Park
- 4KISS, Profit Motive and Foreign Currency Contracts
- 512 Days of … Web Analytics
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250