Pa. Supreme Court Ends Statewide Judicial Emergency
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court has ordered that the statewide judicial emergency declared amid the COVID-19 pandemic be lifted.
May 28, 2020 at 06:13 PM
3 minute read
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court has ordered that the statewide judicial emergency declared amid the COVID-19 pandemic be lifted.
The order, issued Wednesday, states that administrative orders issued by intermediate appellate courts as well as local emergency orders and deadlines remain in effect until they expire or are rescinded. However, the court gave local court leadership the discretion to extend or declare local judicial emergencies.
The order said county courts still have the power to "limit in-person access and proceedings to safeguard the health and safety of court staff, users and the public; suspend jury trials until they can be conducted within health and safety norms; suspend statewide rules restricting the use of advanced communication technology, impeding local provisions for court filings by means other than in-person delivery, [and those] pertaining to rule-based rights to a prompt trial."
Additionally, the order said that lawyers may return to their physical offices if they feel it is necessary "to satisfy their professional obligations," provided they take the appropriate safety measures in accordance with the state's "Yellow Phase" designation.
The cessation of judicial emergency comes shortly after First Judicial District President Judge Idee Fox ordered that all criminal and civil jury trials will be suspended through Sept. 8. The order means that jury trials in the Philadelphia Court of Common Pleas are set to see a total suspension of nearly six months, after court leadership initially decided to suspend court proceedings beginning in mid-March.
The order, issued May 15, also states that, unless attorneys are otherwise notified in their specific cases, all trials, hearings and conferences scheduled through July 6 have been administratively canceled and will be rescheduled. Attorneys will also not be able to file papers in person, but, the order noted, legal papers can still be filed using the electronic filing system.
The Supreme Court declared the statewide judicial emergency March 16.
After Montgomery County Court of Common Pleas President Judge Thomas DelRicci asked the Supreme Court for a declaration of judicial emergency in the county, the justices largely granted the motion, but did not make an immediate ruling at the time on the request to suspend Pennsylvania Rule of Criminal Procedure 600, which grants defendants the right to a speedy trial. Instead the justices held the request under advisement.
In the weeks that followed the Pennsylvania Supreme Court ordering nearly all judicial services shut down as a means of combating the coronavirus, many of the state's largest court systems reduced their prison population by 20% or more. In Allegheny County, the number of people in the local jails dropped by nearly 30%, between March 1 and March 31. In Philadelphia, however, the prison population reduction remained at less than 10% earlier this month.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSmaller Firms in 'Growth Mode' as Competition, Rates Heat Up
Former Federal Judge Christopher Conner Joins Saxton & Stump as Attorney and Shareholder
2 minute readGroen Strokoff O'Neill, LLC adds accomplished Trial Lawyer, William "Bill" Coppol.
1 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Google Makes Appeal to Overturn Jury Verdict Branding the Play Store as an Illegal Monopoly
- 2First Amendment Litigator Returns to Gibson Dunn
- 3In Record Year for Baker Botts, Revenue Up 11.8%, PEP Up 17.6%
- 4Loopholes, DNA Collection and Tech: Does Your Consent as a User of a Genealogy Website Override Another Person’s Fourth Amendment Right?
- 5Free Microsoft Browser Extension Is Costing Content Creators, Class Action Claims
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250