Apartment's Owner Rejected Blame for Tenant's Fall
On Jan. 30, 2017, plaintiff Timothy Higgins, 60, a forklift's operator, was walking up exterior stairs to his apartment, which was located at 9244A Old Tyburn Road, in Morrisville. He lost his footing on the top step and fell backward. He suffered an injury of an ankle.
June 04, 2020 at 12:57 PM
3 minute read
Higgins v. Anders
Defense Verdict
Date of Verdict: Jan. 10.
Court and Case No.: C.P. Bucks No. 2018-01638.
Judge: Robert O. Baldi.
Type of Action: Premises liability, slip and fall.
Injuries: Ankle fracture.
Plaintiffs Counsel: Christopher T. Moyer, Master Weinstein Moyer.
Plaintiffs Expert: David Hardeski, orthopedic surgery; Langhorne.
Defense Counsel: Joseph P. Walsh, Walsh Pancio, Lansdale.
Defense Expert: Joseph B. Mills, engineering, Mullica Hill, New Jersey.
Comment:
On Jan. 30, 2017, plaintiff Timothy Higgins, 60, a forklift's operator, was walking up exterior stairs to his apartment, which was located at 9244A Old Tyburn Road, in Morrisville. He lost his footing on the top step and fell backward. He suffered an injury of an ankle.
Higgins sued the out-of-possession landlord, the Margaret Anders Trust, and its principal, Reuben Anders. Higgins alleged that the trust was negligent for allowing a dangerous condition to exist.
Higgins had lived at the property for two years, and he contended that the top step was partially made of concrete and wood, and that the defective design of the step forced him to turn sideway when using it. Higgins claimed to have lost his balance on prior occasions. His counsel argued that the trust was negligent for failing to remediate the step's defective design.
The defense maintained that the step was not defective. The defense's expert in engineering testified that the step met all applicable municipal and national building codes in terms of dimensions and material. The expert noted that the municipality, prior to Higgins' moving into the property, had inspected the premises and issued a certificate of occupancy.
Higgins suffered a bimalleolar fracture: a fracture involving each of an ankle's malleoli, which are the bony protuberances. The injury involved his left ankle.
Two days after the accident, Higgins presented to an emergency room. He complained of pain and swelling in his left ankle. The next day, he underwent open reduction and internal fixation, in which plates and screws were implanted. He remained non-weight-bearing for a few weeks before starting a course of physical therapy, which he underwent through June 1, 2017. He received no further treatment.
Higgins testified that he is able to function as he did prior to the accident, but that he does so with pain. He claimed that he experiences swelling in his left foot after each workday. Higgins' treating orthopedist opined that Higgins may develop arthritis in his left ankle and that the hardware will remain indefinitely.
Higgins sought to recover a stipulated medical lien of $7,400, and $13,000 in stipulated lost wages, having missed work through June 3, 2017, plus damages for past and future pain and suffering.
The defense maintained that Higgins made a good recovery, as testified by his orthopedic surgeon.
The jury rendered a defense verdict.
This report is based on information that was provided by defense counsel. Plaintiff's counsel did not respond to the reporter's phone calls.
—This report first appeared in VerdictSearch, an ALM publication
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllPa. Federal District Courts Reach Full Complement Following Latest Confirmation
The Defense Bar Is Feeling the Strain: Busy Med Mal Trial Schedules Might Be Phila.'s 'New Normal'
7 minute readFederal Judge Allows Elderly Woman's Consumer Protection Suit to Proceed Against Citizens Bank
5 minute readJudge Leaves Statute of Limitations Question in Injury Crash Suit for a Jury
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Federal Judge Named in Lawsuit Over Underage Drinking Party at His California Home
- 2'Almost an Arms Race': California Law Firms Scooped Up Lateral Talent by the Handful in 2024
- 3Pittsburgh Judge Rules Loan Company's Online Arbitration Agreement Unenforceable
- 4As a New Year Dawns, the Value of Florida’s Revised Mediation Laws Comes Into Greater Focus
- 5Managing Partner Vindicated in Disciplinary Proceeding Brought by Former Associate
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250