Philadelphia's Tax Responses to the COVID-19 Pandemic
Since the COVID-19 health crisis began, the city of Philadelphia's Department of Revenue has been continually addressing how the pandemic affects the city's taxes. This article discusses the key responses and guidance that the department has issued thus far.
June 04, 2020 at 11:15 AM
5 minute read
Since the COVID-19 health crisis began, the city of Philadelphia's Department of Revenue has been continually addressing how the pandemic affects the city's taxes. This article discusses the key responses and guidance that the department has issued thus far.
|Business Income and Receipts Tax (BIRT) and Net Profits Tax (NPT)
The filing and payment deadlines for the BIRT and NPT have been extended through July 15. The extension applies to estimated payments. However, payments received after July 15 will accrue interest and penalties dating back to the original due date of April 15.
The department also announced its position regarding nexus as it relates to the BIRT and NPT. Typically, employees working from home would create nexus for out-of-Philadelphia businesses. However, the department announced that it is waiving the nexus threshold for employees working temporarily from home because of COVID-19. Specifically, receipts for nonresident employees who were working in Philadelphia pre-pandemic and are now temporarily working from home solely as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, will continue to be sourced to Philadelphia for purposes of the BIRT and NPT. However, receipts for resident employees who had been performing services for employers outside of Philadelphia pre-pandemic but are now temporarily working from home in Philadelphia will not be sourced to Philadelphia for purposes of the BIRT and NPT.
|School Income Tax (SIT)
The due date for the SIT did not change because of COVID-19; payment was due April 15. Taxpayers unable to meet that deadline were permitted to file an extension and submit a payment equal to their previous year's liability. Those taxpayers then have until July 15 to file a return and pay any difference in tax owed, without interest or penalty. However, if payment is received after July 15, interest and penalty will accrue back to April 15.
|Use and Occupancy Tax (U&O Tax)
The department announced that businesses that were ordered to close by order of the mayor beginning March 17, are not considered to "occupy" the space for purposes of the U&O tax. However, businesses deemed essential, whether they choose to operate or not, are still subject to the U&O tax. Further, businesses that have continued operations and have employees on-site are still subject to the U&O tax.
Taxpayers that paid the U&O tax while they were not liable for the tax are eligible for a refund. Applying for a refund is a two-step process; a taxpayer must: file an amendment to their annual or monthly return; and complete and submit a refund petition. However, the department is encouraging taxpayers to wait until they can file one amended return to cover the entire period of forced closure. Further, landlords who receive a refund of U&O tax on behalf of their tenants are required to reimburse the tenants for the full amount received on their behalf.
|Wage Tax
Philadelphia's guidance on its wage tax in light of COVID-19 is not "relief," but instead an explanation of its standard policy applied to the present pandemic. The standard inquiry used to determine whether an employee is subject to the wage tax is whether the employee is required to work remotely, or whether the employee is working remotely for the employer's convenience. COVID-19 presents an environment in which employees are required to work remotely. Thus, nonresident employees who work for Philadelphia-based employers are not subject to the wage tax during the time they are required to work remotely outside of Philadelphia.
While nonresident employees are not subject to the wage tax during this time, it is the employer's decision whether to continue to withhold the wage tax or to cease withholding for the remainder of the closure. If the employer continues to withhold the wage tax, the nonresident employee can file for a refund with a wage tax reconciliation form during 2021. Notwithstanding, employers are still required to withhold and remit wage tax for all Philadelphia residents, regardless of where they perform their duties.
|Earnings Tax
Fourth quarter earnings tax payments for 2019 were originally due Jan. 31, 2020. The department extended the time that taxpayers have to file the 2019 Annual Reconciliation for the Earnings Tax to July 15. However, as with the other city taxes that have been extended, payments received after July 15 will accrue interest and penalty dating back to April 15.
|Response to the CARES Act
The CARES Act provides tax relief for individual taxpayers through direct cash payments. Eligible individuals will receive payments of $1,200 for a single individual or $2,400 for married couples filing jointly, while qualifying children generate an additional $500 each. The department announced that the payments received under the CARES Act are not subject to the city's Wage Tax or Earnings Tax, nor are they considered "net income" for purposes of the SIT.
|Real Estate Tax
The department extended the due date for 2020 real estate tax to June 15. Similarly, the department extended the deadline to apply for an installment payment plan. Senior citizens over age 65 and eligible low-income homeowners must apply for the installment plan by June 15.
Jennifer Karpchuk is the co-chair of the state and local tax (SALT) planning and controversy practice at Chamberlain, Hrdlicka, White, Williams & Aughtry. She may be reached at [email protected].
|This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllPa. Federal District Courts Reach Full Complement Following Latest Confirmation
The Defense Bar Is Feeling the Strain: Busy Med Mal Trial Schedules Might Be Phila.'s 'New Normal'
7 minute readFederal Judge Allows Elderly Woman's Consumer Protection Suit to Proceed Against Citizens Bank
5 minute readJudge Leaves Statute of Limitations Question in Injury Crash Suit for a Jury
4 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Solana Labs Co-Founder Allegedly Pocketed Ex-Wife’s ‘Millions of Dollars’ of Crypto Gains
- 2What We Heard From Litigation Leaders This Year
- 3What's Next For Johnson & Johnson's Talcum Powder Litigation?
- 4The Legal's Top 5 Pennsylvania Verdicts of 2024
- 5Civility Underscores the Memory of Our Late Gov. Rell
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250