Restaurant's Patron Claimed Grease Caused Fall, Injuries
On Sept. 29, 2015, plaintiff Curtis Winstead, 40, an owner of a home remodeling business, was a patron at a Texas Roadhouse restaurant in Bridgeville. He slipped and fell while on the property. Winstead claimed head injuries.
June 11, 2020 at 02:21 PM
4 minute read
Winstead v. Roadhouse Investments
$53,747.63 Verdict
Date of Verdict: Feb. 5.
Court and Case No.: C.P. Allegheny No. GD-17-004508.
Judge: Patrick M. Connelly.
Type of Action: Premises liability, slip-and-fall.
Injuries: Back, head, neck injuries.
Plaintiffs Counsel: C. William Kenny, Berger and Green, Pittsburgh.
Plaintiffs Expert: Michael W. Collins, head injury, Pittsburgh.
Defense Counsel: Scott T. Redman, Law Office of Kelley A. Morrone, Wexford.
Defense Experts: David M. Lobas, neurology, Butler; Scott G. Rainey, orthopedic surgery, Butler.
Comment:
On Sept. 29, 2015, plaintiff Curtis Winstead, 40, an owner of a home remodeling business, was a patron at a Texas Roadhouse restaurant in Bridgeville. He slipped and fell while on the property. Winstead claimed head injuries.
Winstead sued the restaurant's owner, Roadhouse Investments LLC. He alleged that the restaurant was negligent for allowing a dangerous condition to exist.
At the time of the accident, Winstead was using a cane after injuring his back. While using his cane, he walked toward an incline ramp to access the restrooms. As he got to the top of the ramp, he slipped and fell on the greasy wet surface, striking his head and rendering himself unconscious.
Winstead's counsel cited a surveillance video that showed him moving slowly when his right foot suddenly slid out from underneath him. His counsel further cited the record by the responding emergency service technician, who noted that the floor was slippery from food residue as well as from rainwater. Winstead's counsel argued that the restaurant failed in its duty to eliminate from its premises any defective conditions that posed a hazard to its patrons. The defense maintained that no dangerous condition caused Winstead's accident. The defense cited the surveillance video to argue that multiple patrons had used the same ramp without difficulty or incident. The defense contended that the accident most likely occurred due to Winstead's use of a cane. Defense claimed that his instability on his feet resulted in his fall.
Winstead was taken by ambulance to a hospital and was admitted. He was diagnosed with a concussion and kept overnight for observation.
Winstead was ultimately diagnosed with an aggravation of a preexisting condition in his thoracic spine; a month before the accident, Winstead suffered a compression fracture at the T7 vertebra. Upon discharge the day after the accident, Sept. 30, 2015, Winstead followed up with his primary care physician, who referred him to a brain injury specialist. In November of that year, Winstead visited the specialist, complaining of headaches, light and noise sensitivity, nausea, fatigue, blurred vision and neck pain. He underwent cognitive testing that showed difficulties with verbal memory and reaction time. Winstead was put on a course of vestibular therapy and given behavioral management strategies, including better regulation of his sleep, diet, hydration, stress and physical activity. He further treated with pain medication.
Through January 2016, Winstead treated with five sessions of vestibular therapy and consulted his brain injury specialist. Through 2018 he treated with physical and occupational therapy for his back injury. He received no further treatment.
Winstead's brain injury specialist causally related Winstead's injuries and treatment to the accident. The expert opined that Winstead' may benefit from further treatment.
Winstead testified that he continues to suffer from headaches, dizziness, occasional nausea and photo/phono-sensitivity. He also complained about intermittent back pain. He sought to recover stipulated medical costs of $3,747.63, plus damages for past pain and suffering. The reason that Winstead sought damages for only past pain and suffering is that Dec. 6, 2019, more than four years after the slip and fall, he was involved in a motor vehicle accident that left him in a medically induced coma.
The defense's experts in neurology and orthopedic surgery testified that any injury Winstead suffered from the Sept. 29, 2015, accident resolved fully, and that his ongoing back complaints are solely due to his preexisting back condition.
The jury found that Roadhouse Investments was negligent. Winstead was determined to receive $53,747.63.
This report is based on information that was provided by plaintiffs counsel. Defense counsel did not respond to calls for comment.
—This report first appeared in VerdictSearch, an ALM publication
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllPa. Federal District Courts Reach Full Complement Following Latest Confirmation
The Defense Bar Is Feeling the Strain: Busy Med Mal Trial Schedules Might Be Phila.'s 'New Normal'
7 minute readFederal Judge Allows Elderly Woman's Consumer Protection Suit to Proceed Against Citizens Bank
5 minute readJudge Leaves Statute of Limitations Question in Injury Crash Suit for a Jury
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Decision of the Day: Judge Reduces $287M Jury Verdict Against Harley-Davidson in Wrongful Death Suit
- 2Kirkland to Covington: 2024's International Chart Toppers and Award Winners
- 3Decision of the Day: Judge Denies Summary Judgment Motions in Suit by Runner Injured in Brooklyn Bridge Park
- 4KISS, Profit Motive and Foreign Currency Contracts
- 512 Days of … Web Analytics
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250