General Assembly Votes to End Emergency Declaration
The General Assembly passed a resolution purporting to end the state of emergency declared by Gov. Tom Wolf in March in response to the coronavirus outbreak.
June 12, 2020 at 01:00 PM
2 minute read
The General Assembly passed a resolution purporting to end the state of emergency declared by Gov. Tom Wolf in March in response to the coronavirus outbreak.
Wolf immediately said the resolution had no legal effect on his executive order, setting up a possible fight to be resolved by the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
The resolution, written by state Rep. Russ Diamond, R-Lebanon, passed on a 31-19 vote in the Senate and 121-81 vote in the state House of Representatives on June 9. Two Senate and 12 House Democrats joined all of the Republicans in supporting the measure.
House Resolution 836 cited statutory authority for the General Assembly to terminate a governor's emergency declaration.
"Our duty as a co-equal branch of government is to serve as a check on that authority in case that judgment creeps into overreach or violates the rights of Pennsylvania citizens," Diamond said in a memo to colleagues.
"We can't do this for another 90 days," said state Sen. Camera Bartolotta, R-Washington, according to a report from Pittsburgh television station WTAE, referring to restrictions that have curbed business and resulted in job loss.
State Sen. Lindsey Williams, D-Allegheny, countered that removing the emergency declaration would jeopardize federal funding sought by the state government.
Wolf said in a statement that the concurrent resolution has to come to his desk for signature before it can have effect.
"Ending the disaster declaration also would remove many practical aspects of the state's response to this disaster," Wolf said in a statement, "including the authority to activate the National Guard to help with nursing homes; deploying commonwealth personnel, services and distributing supplies and equipment; implementing emergency funding; [and] suspending rules and regulations that would hinder or delay necessary action in coping with the emergency."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllPa. Federal District Courts Reach Full Complement Following Latest Confirmation
Federal Judge Hits US With $227,000 Sanction for Discovery Misconduct
3 minute readPa. Supreme Court Taps New Philadelphia Family Division Administrative Judge
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1SoundCloud GC Takes Legal Reins of Condé Nast at Tumultuous Time
- 2When Dealing With Child Abuse Cases, Attorneys Need to Know How Children Perceive Time
- 3Like a Life Raft: Ben Brafman Reflects on Nearly 50 Years as a Defense Attorney
- 4HSF Partner Removed Over ‘Deeply Offensive’ Tweets
- 5Another Latham Partner Heads to Sidley in London
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250