Plaintiff Suffered Psychological Injuries From Kidnapping, Assault
On Feb. 3, 2016, plaintiff Tarjinder Singh, a gas station attendant in his mid-20s, was assaulted and kidnapped by his supervisor, Joseph Cherian, and three other men—Neeraj Gupta, Dony Davy and Matthew Praveen—in Philadelphia. Singh claimed that he suffered psychological injuries.
June 18, 2020 at 01:15 PM
5 minute read
Singh v. Speed Petroleum
$107,000 Verdict
Date of Verdict: Dec. 17, 2019.
Court and Case No.: C.P. Philadelphia No. 180105671.
Judge: Michael E. Erdos.
Type of Action: Intentional Torts, assault, battery.
Injuries: Bruises, mental, psychological.
Plaintiffs Counsel: Alan E. Denenberg, Abramson & Denenberg.
Plaintiffs Expert: Bruce H. Grossinger, neurology, Eddystone.
Defense Counsel: Steven C. Feinstein, Feinstein Law Offices; West Chester; Thomas W. Harrity, The Law Offices of Thomas W. Harrity, Philadelphia.
Comment:
On Feb. 3, 2016, plaintiff Tarjinder Singh, a gas station attendant in his mid-20s, was assaulted and kidnapped by his supervisor, Joseph Cherian, and three other men—Neeraj Gupta, Dony Davy and Matthew Praveen—in Philadelphia. Singh claimed that he suffered psychological injuries.
Singh sued Cherian, Gupta, Davy and Praveen, and his own employer, Speed Petroleum Inc. He alleged claims of assault, battery and intentional infliction of emotional distress. According to Singh, Cherian failed to pay him after he worked at Speed Petroleum for three weeks. This prompted Singh, on Feb. 3, 2016, to help himself to the gas station's cash register and take an amount of cash close to what he was allegedly owed. Subsequently, Singh contended, Cherian and his three associates—Gupta, Davy and Praveen—went to his house and physically assaulted him. He claimed they kidnapped him and drove him to the gas station, where they threatened him. Then, Singh claimed, the men took him back to their vehicle and proceeded to drive to an undisclosed location. During this time, Singh was able to escape from the moving vehicle and contact the police.
In 2017, the defendants were found guilty of a variety of charges, including aggravated assault, kidnapping, false imprisonment, burglary, simple assault, endangering another person and possessing an instrument of crime. The men were convicted; Cherian was given 17 months of jail time, and Gupta, Davy and Praveen were given probation. The sentencing also included payment of restitution by the defendants for hospital bills.
The defense maintained that Singh stole from the gas station's register more than $2,400 in cash, which he claimed was owed to him for his three weeks of work. On Feb. 3, 2016, Cherian called the police to report the theft and then called Singh and demanded return of the funds. According to the defense, when Singh refused, Cherian and three other men—Gupta, Davy and Praveen—went to the boarding house where Singh resided and confronted him. They then assaulted him and brought him back to the gas station to watch the surveillance video that captured the theft. Singh then confessed to the theft and signed a statement admitting to it. He promised to return the money within five days. Thereafter, the defendants were driving Singh back to his residence when he jumped out of the car and fled; he ultimately called the police and reported that he had been kidnapped and assaulted.
Prior to the trial, the court entered summary judgment on liability in favor of Singh and against the defendants, given the underlying criminal convictions. The trial was held to determine the amount of damages to be awarded.
Singh, after notifying police of the Feb. 3, 2016, events, presented to an emergency room and was treated and released for multiple bruises and abrasions throughout his face and body. No fractures or internal organ injuries were diagnosed.
Sing was ultimately diagnosed with psychological injuries, including post-traumatic disorder, anxiety, panic attacks and flashbacks.
In the ensuing years, he treated at mental health facilities, suffered alcohol abuse and suicidal ideations and, on one occasion, was hospitalized after suffering from alcohol poisoning, resulting in a medically induced coma. At the time of the trial, Sing continued to receive psychological counseling.
Sing's expert in neurology attributed the plaintiff's psychological injuries to the incident with Cherian, Gupta, Davy and Praveen.
In seeking punitive damages, Singh's counsel argued that Cherian, Gupta, Davy and Praveen's established criminal conduct was willful and wanton. Singh sought to recover compensatory and punitive damages.
The defense cited Singh's emergency room records on the date of the assault. The records revealed that he was diagnosed with minimal injuries, having been found with only abrasions and contusions. X-rays revealed no fractured bones or internal injuries, and Singh was released the same day.
The defense conceded that Singh suffered physical injuries as a result of the assault, and some emotional harm, but disputed the causal connection of significant psychological harm, given that he had a prior history of mental illness and alcohol dependence.
The defense noted Singh's admission, at the trial, that when he was 14 years old, he was kidnapped and assaulted while residing in the Philippines. Singh alleged that this was an event from which he fully recovered in a few months.
The defense maintained that the opinions of Singh's expert were not based on any examination of him; rather, his opinions were based on a records review.
The jury found the defendants joint and severally liable. Singh was determined to receive $107,000.
This report is based on information that was provided by counsel for plaintiff, Speed Petroleum Inc., Joseph Cherian, Dony Davy and Matthew Praveen. Counsel for Neeraj Gupta did not respond to the reporter's phone calls.
—This report first appeared in VerdictSearch, an ALM publication
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllPa. Federal District Courts Reach Full Complement Following Latest Confirmation
The Defense Bar Is Feeling the Strain: Busy Med Mal Trial Schedules Might Be Phila.'s 'New Normal'
7 minute readFederal Judge Allows Elderly Woman's Consumer Protection Suit to Proceed Against Citizens Bank
5 minute readJudge Leaves Statute of Limitations Question in Injury Crash Suit for a Jury
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Decision of the Day: Judge Reduces $287M Jury Verdict Against Harley-Davidson in Wrongful Death Suit
- 2Kirkland to Covington: 2024's International Chart Toppers and Award Winners
- 3Decision of the Day: Judge Denies Summary Judgment Motions in Suit by Runner Injured in Brooklyn Bridge Park
- 4KISS, Profit Motive and Foreign Currency Contracts
- 512 Days of … Web Analytics
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250