Woman Not Hurt in Auto Accident, Defense Contended
On July 13, 2016, plaintiff April Reeves, 48, was driving on Walnut Street, near its intersection at 51st Street, in West Philadelphia. While her car was stopped, its rear end was struck by a trailing vehicle that was being driven by an uninsured motorist, Shanae Miley. Reeves claimed that she suffered injuries of her back and neck.
June 18, 2020 at 04:53 PM
3 minute read
Reeves v. Miley
Defense Verdict
Date of Verdict: Jan. 7.
Court and Case No.: C.P. Philadelphia No. 180600593.
Judge: Lori A. Dumas.
Type of Action: Motor vehicle.
Injuries: Back injury.
Plaintiffs Counsel: Jason E. Fine, J Fine Law, Philadelphia.
Plaintiffs Expert: David A. Lenrow, physical medicine; Philadelphia.
Defense Counsel: Warren D. Holland, Goldberg, Miller & Rubin, Philadelphia.
Defense Expert: Ryan K. Lee, radiology, Philadelphia.
Comment:
On July 13, 2016, plaintiff April Reeves, 48, was driving on Walnut Street, near its intersection at 51st Street, in West Philadelphia. While her car was stopped, its rear end was struck by a trailing vehicle that was being driven by an uninsured motorist, Shanae Miley. Reeves claimed that she suffered injuries of her back and neck.
Reeves sued Miley. The lawsuit alleged that Miley was negligent in the operation of her vehicle. Reeves also sued her own insurer, State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. Reeves sought to recover her uninsured-motorist policy of $25,000.
During court-mandated arbitration, a panel of arbitrators found in favor of State Farm and against Reeves, prompting Reeves to appeal the decision. The case was tried on the issues of causation, damages and whether Reeves suffered a serious impairment of a bodily function, as State Farm stipulated to liability.
Within days of the accident, Reeves presented to a medical facility, complaining of pain in her neck and back.
Reeves was ultimately diagnosed with herniations of her L3-4 and L4-5 intervertebral discs. She also claimed that she suffered a sprain and a strain of her cervical region.
Within weeks of the accident, Reeves came under the care of a physiatrist. The doctor put her on a course of physical therapy, which she followed through January 2017. The treatment consisted of massages and exercises.
Reeves' physiatrist testified that Reeves' cervical and lumbar injuries were caused by the accident and that the injuries were a serious impairment of a bodily function.
Reeves testified that she made a good recovery but continues to suffer intermittent pain in her neck and back. She sought to recover $1,700 in medical costs, plus damages for past and future pain and suffering.
The defense argued that Reeves did not sustain a serious impairment of a bodily function. The defense's expert in radiology testified that Reeves' imaging studies were absent of any traumatic injuries.
This report is based on information that was provided by State Farm's counsel. Plaintiffs counsel did not respond to the reporter's phone calls, and Miley's counsel was not asked to contribute.
—This report first appeared in VerdictSearch, an ALM publication
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllPa. Federal District Courts Reach Full Complement Following Latest Confirmation
The Defense Bar Is Feeling the Strain: Busy Med Mal Trial Schedules Might Be Phila.'s 'New Normal'
7 minute readFederal Judge Allows Elderly Woman's Consumer Protection Suit to Proceed Against Citizens Bank
5 minute readJudge Leaves Statute of Limitations Question in Injury Crash Suit for a Jury
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Tuesday Newspaper
- 2Judicial Ethics Opinion 24-85
- 3Decision of the Day: Administrative Court Finds Prevailing Wage Law Applies to Workers Who Cleaned NYC Subways During Pandemic
- 4Trailblazing Broward Judge Retires; Legacy Includes Bush v. Gore
- 5Federal Judge Named in Lawsuit Over Underage Drinking Party at His California Home
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250