How the E-Data Lawyer Challenges Practice Group Silos and Business-as-Usual
By understanding and using client data seamlessly, the e-data lawyer bridges the gap between a mature e-discovery practice and emerging data challenges in other areas of the law.
June 24, 2020 at 01:40 PM
6 minute read
In the first installment of this four-part series published in early March, we described the new kind of lawyer that has emerged from nearly two decades of e-discovery work. The e-discovery lawyer—a Jack-of-all trades who has experience across a broad spectrum of practice areas. She is a tactician, a litigator and a technologist. To succeed in the evolving legal landscape, we discussed how the e-discovery lawyer should not rest on her laurels and must prepare to transform herself into an e-data lawyer—a Jill of even more trades. By understanding and using client data seamlessly, the e-data lawyer bridges the gap between a mature e-discovery practice and emerging data challenges in other areas of the law.
When we wrote the first article in this series, we did not know a global pandemic would lead to the months-long closure of businesses around the country, create a mass migration of employees to a remote work setting, and cause one of the sharpest declines in GDP since the Great Depression. Prior to the major disruptions caused by COVID-19, clients were already increasing their reliance on alternative legal service providers, seeking more automation of legal services, and requiring law firms to operate with more accountability and stricter cost controls.
Although the full impact of the last four months is still uncertain for law firms and their clients, as the economy opens again and workers return to the office, we anticipate the changes that were already afoot in the legal market will accelerate in scale and pace. Clients will look for law firms to do more with less and will ask their lawyers to become solutions architects who are capable of solving current problems and preventing future ones.
In this shifting environment, the e-data lawyer will become a critical part of building a new legal economy fueled by data. To serve clients effectively, the e-data lawyer must embrace a deep understanding of all aspects of data, including data regulation (privacy and security), the benefits and risks data poses to our clients, and how technologies can harness the power of data to solve legal problems. The e-data lawyer will help clients by embracing data-driven processes that lead to superior decision-making.
The e-data attorney expands her practice by thinking of the delivery of legal services differently.
She compliments her broad set of skills as a litigator, technologist, and tactician by surrounding herself with attorneys with multi-disciplinary backgrounds. By collaborating with lawyers in other practice areas, the e-data attorney can gain new perspectives and bring new offerings to the market for clients. In turn, these offerings will create efficiencies, cost-savings and improved outcomes for clients.
In many respects, the e-data lawyer functions like the general contractor building a skyscraper. She brings together an array of specialists to deliver results and has sufficient expertise to collaborate with and manage them. As the volume and complexity of data grows, these teammates use process design and cutting-edge technology to enhance the e-data lawyer's offerings beyond traditional e-discovery.
To fully understand and support the growing universe of data types, sources and uses, the e-data lawyer works closely with data scientists and data analysts. At their core, every case or controversy, due diligence matter or internal investigation is nothing more than a problem or series of problems awaiting solutions. The e-data lawyer understands these solutions can be mined from the large volume of data routinely collected by clients. Through the use of skilled people, proven processes, and new technology, the e-data lawyer turns data into actionable information for her clients. Insight derived from data leads to better decisions and faster resolutions of problems. The e-data lawyer also expands her service offerings with project managers, designers, and software engineers. These skilled professionals design and improve processes and deliver customized solutions and efficiencies for clients.
These professionals not only have a voice on the team, but they have seats at the table and work hand-in-hand with the e-data lawyer to build her practice. With more services and solutions, the e-data lawyer increases her engagement with clients and develops deeper relationships with them. The e-data lawyer's practice becomes the intersection between data processes, legal analysis and technology.
The e-data lawyer also uses her diverse practice to challenge typical practice group silos and a business-as-usual mantra. As the barriers to providing legal services begin to erode in the United States, as they have in Europe, professionals and service providers will compete with lawyers and law firms in the same marketplace. Under these circumstances, the ability of law firms to work through a multi-disciplinary lens will be critical to their success, if not their survival. By collaborating with consultants, vendors, and other professionals, to offer new services, the e-data lawyer positions herself to respond to new competitors.
In addition to seeking out employees with diverse skills, the e-data lawyer also assembles a workforce as diverse as our communities and country. This diversity includes race, gender, age, education, sexual orientation and socio-economic background. Although diversity brings a multitude of benefits, it is no secret that the legal profession has lagged other professions in realizing full diversity. In the future, a fully diverse legal workforce will not be an aspiration but a perquisite for a successful practice. The benefits of a diverse workforce are well-documented and numerous. We know diversity is good for business. Our clients have discovered this to be true. The bottom line of a recent study by the Boston Consulting Group is that diversity increases a company's profits.
Beyond profits, diversity stimulates innovation and for people in the business of solving client problems, this is another means to ensure success. Naturally, people with different backgrounds have different perspectives and approach problems differently. This thinking leads to an array of solutions, which increases the likelihood any problem can be solved for a client. Simply put, diversity enhances diversity of thought, which is essential in a global business environment.
Finally, the e-data lawyer knows diversity for its own sake is not good enough. Inclusion is the action behind diversity efforts. A diverse workforce must be cultivated, given a voice (and heard), and made to feel welcome in the life of a law firm. The full value of a practice group with a range of diverse workers can be unlocked only through inclusivity.
To expand her practice, the e-data lawyer must be capable of solving her clients' most complex problems. She can do so by leveraging the diverse skills of her team to understand and use data. In the next part of the series, we discuss how the e-data lawyer can expand her practice by using technology, her partnerships across industries and process re-engineering with a focus on customer experience and success.
Morgan, Lewis & Bockius partners Tess Blair and Tara Lawler, and associate William Childress, focus their practices on e-discovery, information management and data privacy.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllDon’t Settle for the Minimum: Finding Constitutional Claims Closer to Home
7 minute readSeven Rules of the Road for Managing Referrals To/From Other Attorneys, Part 1
7 minute readMatt's Corner: RPC 8.4(d)—Conduct Prejudicial to the Administration of Justice
2 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Friday Newspaper
- 2Judge Denies Sean Combs Third Bail Bid, Citing Community Safety
- 3Republican FTC Commissioner: 'The Time for Rulemaking by the Biden-Harris FTC Is Over'
- 4NY Appellate Panel Cites Student's Disciplinary History While Sending Negligence Claim Against School District to Trial
- 5A Meta DIG and Its Nvidia Implications
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250