Litigation Boutique LeVan Muhic Stapleton Formed by Big Law Alums
"Ultimately, we want to be a true litigation boutique firm: agile, efficient, innovative and adaptable to different subject matters and forums," said John Stapleton. "We focus on complex commercial litigation of a very broad scope."
July 01, 2020 at 12:55 PM
4 minute read
Billed as an "alternative to the legal marketplace," LeVan Muhic Stapleton, a new litigation boutique focusing on complex commercial litigation, class actions and other sophisticated work, opened its doors in Philadelphia and Marlton, New Jersey, on Wednesday.
The three founding partners, Peter "Tad" LeVan and Peter Muhic, most recently of the LeVan Law Group, and John Stapleton, formerly of Stapleton Law, are part of the unique merger.
They intend to offer an "alternative to the legal marketplace," providing Big Law-quality work within a nimble platform that can better meet clients' needs, they say. They are not leaving any lawyers behind in forming their new firm, and anticipate all of their clients remaining with them in the transition.
"Ultimately, we want to be a true litigation boutique firm: agile, efficient, innovative and adaptable to different subject matters and forums," Stapleton said. "We focus on complex commercial litigation of a very broad scope."
LeVan Muhic Stapleton will represent plaintiffs and defendants through trials, appeals, and alternative dispute resolution proceeding, and its lawyers have litigated numerous high-profile trials and appeals. All three partners have significant experience at large firms, they noted.
"It's exciting to [be] building something new and to put our three names on the firm together," Stapleton said.
Stapleton previously worked at Cravath, Swaine & Moore, and was a partner at Hangley Aronchick Segal Pudlin & Schiller, before forming his own firm in 2019. His business litigation clients have included Wawa Inc. and the city of Philadelphia. He was a leader for the legal team that successfully defended Philadelphia's beverage tax.
Stapleton said that clients of his such as Ocean Spray Cranberries Inc. and ASPIRA Inc. of Pennsylvania will move to the newly formed firm.
The attorneys making up the new firm "already were co-counseling on cases, and we have been resources for each other in numerous ways," Muhic said in a news release.
"This new firm is a natural extension of our shared views on litigation strategies, work ethic, and our core values," he said.
Muhic was previously a partner at Cozen O'Connor and at Kessler Topaz Meltzer & Check, where he developed a significant class action practice. He has represented management as well as employees in employment disputes, and has extensive experience with ERISA, FLSA, RICO, fiduciary and products liability matters.
LeVan said, "I handle commercial litigation and class action cases, while Muhic and Stapleton have significant experience in litigation and class actions, and it buttresses the firm." He added, "I consider myself and my partners sophisticated trial lawyers and it is a great fit."
LeVan worked at Squire Sanders & Dempsey; was a partner at Hangley Aronchick, where he first worked with Stapleton in 2005; and was a partner at Kessler Topaz, where he first worked with Muhic in 2009. In 2013, he formed his own firm, LeVan Law Group.
LeVan is currently court-appointed class counsel in a certified class action in the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania, representing hundreds of landowners in a royalties dispute over local natural gas resources, in addition to other matters related to oil and gas, he said.
"I have a number of complex commercial litigation cases in federal and state courts in Philadelphia, and I regularly appear before the Third Circuit Court of Appeals," LeVan said.
Concerning COVID-19, Stapleton said the court closures have delayed matters, but as people have adapted, they have continued to do business and to represent their clients, such as in court hearings via video conference, and an increased exchange of information and data electronically.
"We see ourselves growing and evolving—when it comes to business, we have to adapt or be left behind," Stapleton said.
All three partners have a history of pro bono and nonprofit board service. As a founding principle of the firm, they have adopted the "My100 Initiative," which commits each firm lawyer to perform at least 100 hours of pro bono or nonprofit board service each year, the lawyers said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllThe Forgotten Ballot: Expanding Voting Access for Incarcerated Populations
5 minute readRemembering Am Law 100 Firm Founder and 'Force of Nature' Stephen Cozen
5 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 2Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 3Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
- 4Husch Blackwell, Foley Among Law Firms Opening Southeast Offices This Year
- 5In Lawsuit, Ex-Google Employee Says Company’s Layoffs Targeted Parents and Others on Leave
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250